激励智能家居中的高级负载调度

Ye Xu, David E. Irwin, P. Shenoy
{"title":"激励智能家居中的高级负载调度","authors":"Ye Xu, David E. Irwin, P. Shenoy","doi":"10.1145/2528282.2528292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, researchers have proposed numerous advanced load scheduling algorithms for smart homes with the goal of reducing the grid's peak power usage. In parallel, utilities have introduced variable rate pricing plans to incentivize residential consumers to shift more of their power usage to low-price, off-peak periods, also with the goal of reducing the grid's peak power usage. In this paper, we argue that variable rate pricing plans do not incentivize consumers to adopt advanced load scheduling algorithms. While beneficial to the grid, these algorithms do not significantly lower a consumer's electric bill. To address the problem, we propose flat-power pricing, which directly incentivizes consumers to flatten their own demand profile, rather than shift as much of their power usage as possible to low-cost, off-peak periods. Since most loads have only limited scheduling freedom, load scheduling algorithms often cannot shift much, if any, power usage to low-cost, off-peak periods, which are often many hours in the future. In contrast, flat-power pricing encourages consumers to shift power usage even over short time intervals to flatten demand. We evaluate the benefits of advanced load scheduling algorithms using flat-power pricing, showing that consumers save up to 40% on their electric bill, compared with 11% using an existing time-of-use rate plan.","PeriodicalId":184274,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th ACM Workshop on Embedded Systems For Energy-Efficient Buildings","volume":"131 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incentivizing Advanced Load Scheduling in Smart Homes\",\"authors\":\"Ye Xu, David E. Irwin, P. Shenoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2528282.2528292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, researchers have proposed numerous advanced load scheduling algorithms for smart homes with the goal of reducing the grid's peak power usage. In parallel, utilities have introduced variable rate pricing plans to incentivize residential consumers to shift more of their power usage to low-price, off-peak periods, also with the goal of reducing the grid's peak power usage. In this paper, we argue that variable rate pricing plans do not incentivize consumers to adopt advanced load scheduling algorithms. While beneficial to the grid, these algorithms do not significantly lower a consumer's electric bill. To address the problem, we propose flat-power pricing, which directly incentivizes consumers to flatten their own demand profile, rather than shift as much of their power usage as possible to low-cost, off-peak periods. Since most loads have only limited scheduling freedom, load scheduling algorithms often cannot shift much, if any, power usage to low-cost, off-peak periods, which are often many hours in the future. In contrast, flat-power pricing encourages consumers to shift power usage even over short time intervals to flatten demand. We evaluate the benefits of advanced load scheduling algorithms using flat-power pricing, showing that consumers save up to 40% on their electric bill, compared with 11% using an existing time-of-use rate plan.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 5th ACM Workshop on Embedded Systems For Energy-Efficient Buildings\",\"volume\":\"131 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 5th ACM Workshop on Embedded Systems For Energy-Efficient Buildings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2528282.2528292\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th ACM Workshop on Embedded Systems For Energy-Efficient Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2528282.2528292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

近年来,研究人员为智能家居提出了许多先进的负荷调度算法,目标是降低电网的峰值用电量。与此同时,公用事业公司已经推出了可变费率定价计划,以激励住宅用户将更多的电力使用转移到低价格、非高峰时期,这也是为了减少电网的高峰用电量。在本文中,我们认为可变费率定价计划并不能激励消费者采用先进的负荷调度算法。虽然对电网有利,但这些算法并没有显著降低消费者的电费。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了统一电价,直接激励消费者调整自己的需求,而不是将尽可能多的电力使用转移到低成本的非高峰时期。由于大多数负载只有有限的调度自由度,因此负载调度算法通常不能将大量(如果有的话)电力使用转移到低成本的非高峰时段,这些时段通常是未来的许多小时。相比之下,统一电价鼓励消费者即使在很短的时间间隔内改变电力使用,以稳定需求。我们评估了使用统一电价的先进负荷调度算法的好处,结果表明,与使用现有的分时电价计划节省11%的电费相比,消费者节省了高达40%的电费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incentivizing Advanced Load Scheduling in Smart Homes
In recent years, researchers have proposed numerous advanced load scheduling algorithms for smart homes with the goal of reducing the grid's peak power usage. In parallel, utilities have introduced variable rate pricing plans to incentivize residential consumers to shift more of their power usage to low-price, off-peak periods, also with the goal of reducing the grid's peak power usage. In this paper, we argue that variable rate pricing plans do not incentivize consumers to adopt advanced load scheduling algorithms. While beneficial to the grid, these algorithms do not significantly lower a consumer's electric bill. To address the problem, we propose flat-power pricing, which directly incentivizes consumers to flatten their own demand profile, rather than shift as much of their power usage as possible to low-cost, off-peak periods. Since most loads have only limited scheduling freedom, load scheduling algorithms often cannot shift much, if any, power usage to low-cost, off-peak periods, which are often many hours in the future. In contrast, flat-power pricing encourages consumers to shift power usage even over short time intervals to flatten demand. We evaluate the benefits of advanced load scheduling algorithms using flat-power pricing, showing that consumers save up to 40% on their electric bill, compared with 11% using an existing time-of-use rate plan.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信