人-代理互动的社会心理学

J. Gratch
{"title":"人-代理互动的社会心理学","authors":"J. Gratch","doi":"10.1145/3349537.3351909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Designers of human-agent systems often assume that users interact with machines as if they are interacting with another person. As a consequences, fidelity to human behavior is often viewed as the gold standard for judging agent design, and theories of human social psychology are often accepted without question as a framework for informing human-agent interaction. This assumption was given strength by the pioneering work of Cliff Nass showing that many of the effects studied within social psychology seem to apply to human-machine interaction. In this talk, I will illustrate that these social effects are much weaker than widely supposed, and that the differences in how people treat machines are arguably more interesting than the similarities. These differences can lead to novel insights into human social cognition and unique technological solutions to intractable social problems. I will discuss this in the context of our research on education and mental health. Thus, rather copying human behavior, I will argue that HAI researchers should aim to transcend conventional forms of social interaction, and work towards novel theoretical frameworks that address the novel psychology of human-agent interaction.","PeriodicalId":188834,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction","volume":"153 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Social Psychology of Human-agent Interaction\",\"authors\":\"J. Gratch\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3349537.3351909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Designers of human-agent systems often assume that users interact with machines as if they are interacting with another person. As a consequences, fidelity to human behavior is often viewed as the gold standard for judging agent design, and theories of human social psychology are often accepted without question as a framework for informing human-agent interaction. This assumption was given strength by the pioneering work of Cliff Nass showing that many of the effects studied within social psychology seem to apply to human-machine interaction. In this talk, I will illustrate that these social effects are much weaker than widely supposed, and that the differences in how people treat machines are arguably more interesting than the similarities. These differences can lead to novel insights into human social cognition and unique technological solutions to intractable social problems. I will discuss this in the context of our research on education and mental health. Thus, rather copying human behavior, I will argue that HAI researchers should aim to transcend conventional forms of social interaction, and work towards novel theoretical frameworks that address the novel psychology of human-agent interaction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":188834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction\",\"volume\":\"153 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3349537.3351909\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3349537.3351909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

人类代理系统的设计者通常假设用户与机器交互就像他们与另一个人交互一样。因此,对人类行为的忠实度通常被视为判断智能体设计的黄金标准,人类社会心理学理论通常被毫无疑问地接受为人类与智能体互动的框架。克里夫·纳斯(Cliff Nass)的开创性工作为这一假设提供了支持,该工作表明,社会心理学中研究的许多效应似乎适用于人机交互。在这次演讲中,我将说明这些社会效应比人们普遍认为的要弱得多,而且人们对待机器的方式的差异可以说比相似之处更有趣。这些差异可以导致对人类社会认知的新见解,以及解决棘手社会问题的独特技术解决方案。我将在我们的教育和心理健康研究的背景下讨论这个问题。因此,与其复制人类行为,我认为人工智能研究人员应该致力于超越传统的社会互动形式,并致力于解决人类-代理互动的新心理学的新理论框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Social Psychology of Human-agent Interaction
Designers of human-agent systems often assume that users interact with machines as if they are interacting with another person. As a consequences, fidelity to human behavior is often viewed as the gold standard for judging agent design, and theories of human social psychology are often accepted without question as a framework for informing human-agent interaction. This assumption was given strength by the pioneering work of Cliff Nass showing that many of the effects studied within social psychology seem to apply to human-machine interaction. In this talk, I will illustrate that these social effects are much weaker than widely supposed, and that the differences in how people treat machines are arguably more interesting than the similarities. These differences can lead to novel insights into human social cognition and unique technological solutions to intractable social problems. I will discuss this in the context of our research on education and mental health. Thus, rather copying human behavior, I will argue that HAI researchers should aim to transcend conventional forms of social interaction, and work towards novel theoretical frameworks that address the novel psychology of human-agent interaction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信