50年的人工智能研究

Hamid R. Ekbia
{"title":"50年的人工智能研究","authors":"Hamid R. Ekbia","doi":"10.1002/aris.2010.1440440112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) has come of age. Two thousand and six marked the fiftieth anniversary of the Dartmouth Conference, where the term Artificial Intelligence was accepted as the official label for a new discipline that seemed to hold great promise in the pursuit of understanding the human mind. AI, as the nascent discipline came to be known in public and academic discourse, has accomplished a lot during this period, breaking new ground and providing deep insights into our minds, our technologies, and the relationship between them. But AI has also failed significantly, making false promises and often manifesting a kind of unbridled enthusiasm that is emblematic of Hollywood-style projects. This chapter seeks to capture both of these aspects: AI’s successes, accomplishments, and contributions to science, technology, and intellectual inquiry, on one hand, and its failures, fallacies, and shortcomings, on the other. The history of AI can, furthermore, be reviewed from different perspectives— humanistic, cognitive, sociological, and philosophical, among others. This review examines AI from two key perspectives—scientific and engineering. The former represents AI claims about the human mind and the nature of intelligence; the latter embodies the wide array of computer systems that are built by AI practitioners or by others who have, or claim to have, taken inspiration from ideas in AI in order to solve a practical problem in an area of application. Ideally, the scientific face should guide the engineering one and the engineering face would provide support and substance to its scientific counterpart. In reality, however, that relationship is not as straightforward as it should be, turning AI into a schizophrenic Janus. The way AI practitioners “talk” about these two faces complicates the situation even further, as we shall see. This review seeks to provide a balanced portrait of the two faces. Currently, we are witnessing a resurgence of interest in, and application of, AI in areas such as education, video gaming, financial forecasting, medical diagnosis, health and elderly care, data mining, self-aware computing, and the Semantic Web. The list is illustrative, but it clearly indicates the broad range of application domains that draw on AI techniques for ideas and solutions. As a general heuristic, whenever one encounters something qualified as “smart” or “intelligent”—as in CHAPTER 5","PeriodicalId":55509,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Information Science and Technology","volume":"44 1","pages":"201-242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/aris.2010.1440440112","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fifty years of research in artificial intelligence\",\"authors\":\"Hamid R. Ekbia\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aris.2010.1440440112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artificial Intelligence (AI) has come of age. Two thousand and six marked the fiftieth anniversary of the Dartmouth Conference, where the term Artificial Intelligence was accepted as the official label for a new discipline that seemed to hold great promise in the pursuit of understanding the human mind. AI, as the nascent discipline came to be known in public and academic discourse, has accomplished a lot during this period, breaking new ground and providing deep insights into our minds, our technologies, and the relationship between them. But AI has also failed significantly, making false promises and often manifesting a kind of unbridled enthusiasm that is emblematic of Hollywood-style projects. This chapter seeks to capture both of these aspects: AI’s successes, accomplishments, and contributions to science, technology, and intellectual inquiry, on one hand, and its failures, fallacies, and shortcomings, on the other. The history of AI can, furthermore, be reviewed from different perspectives— humanistic, cognitive, sociological, and philosophical, among others. This review examines AI from two key perspectives—scientific and engineering. The former represents AI claims about the human mind and the nature of intelligence; the latter embodies the wide array of computer systems that are built by AI practitioners or by others who have, or claim to have, taken inspiration from ideas in AI in order to solve a practical problem in an area of application. Ideally, the scientific face should guide the engineering one and the engineering face would provide support and substance to its scientific counterpart. In reality, however, that relationship is not as straightforward as it should be, turning AI into a schizophrenic Janus. The way AI practitioners “talk” about these two faces complicates the situation even further, as we shall see. This review seeks to provide a balanced portrait of the two faces. Currently, we are witnessing a resurgence of interest in, and application of, AI in areas such as education, video gaming, financial forecasting, medical diagnosis, health and elderly care, data mining, self-aware computing, and the Semantic Web. The list is illustrative, but it clearly indicates the broad range of application domains that draw on AI techniques for ideas and solutions. As a general heuristic, whenever one encounters something qualified as “smart” or “intelligent”—as in CHAPTER 5\",\"PeriodicalId\":55509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Review of Information Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"201-242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/aris.2010.1440440112\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Review of Information Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aris.2010.1440440112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Information Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aris.2010.1440440112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Fifty years of research in artificial intelligence

Fifty years of research in artificial intelligence
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has come of age. Two thousand and six marked the fiftieth anniversary of the Dartmouth Conference, where the term Artificial Intelligence was accepted as the official label for a new discipline that seemed to hold great promise in the pursuit of understanding the human mind. AI, as the nascent discipline came to be known in public and academic discourse, has accomplished a lot during this period, breaking new ground and providing deep insights into our minds, our technologies, and the relationship between them. But AI has also failed significantly, making false promises and often manifesting a kind of unbridled enthusiasm that is emblematic of Hollywood-style projects. This chapter seeks to capture both of these aspects: AI’s successes, accomplishments, and contributions to science, technology, and intellectual inquiry, on one hand, and its failures, fallacies, and shortcomings, on the other. The history of AI can, furthermore, be reviewed from different perspectives— humanistic, cognitive, sociological, and philosophical, among others. This review examines AI from two key perspectives—scientific and engineering. The former represents AI claims about the human mind and the nature of intelligence; the latter embodies the wide array of computer systems that are built by AI practitioners or by others who have, or claim to have, taken inspiration from ideas in AI in order to solve a practical problem in an area of application. Ideally, the scientific face should guide the engineering one and the engineering face would provide support and substance to its scientific counterpart. In reality, however, that relationship is not as straightforward as it should be, turning AI into a schizophrenic Janus. The way AI practitioners “talk” about these two faces complicates the situation even further, as we shall see. This review seeks to provide a balanced portrait of the two faces. Currently, we are witnessing a resurgence of interest in, and application of, AI in areas such as education, video gaming, financial forecasting, medical diagnosis, health and elderly care, data mining, self-aware computing, and the Semantic Web. The list is illustrative, but it clearly indicates the broad range of application domains that draw on AI techniques for ideas and solutions. As a general heuristic, whenever one encounters something qualified as “smart” or “intelligent”—as in CHAPTER 5
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annual Review of Information Science and Technology
Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信