蒙特卡罗响应时间分析

S. Bozhko, G. V. D. Brüggen, Björn B. Brandenburg
{"title":"蒙特卡罗响应时间分析","authors":"S. Bozhko, G. V. D. Brüggen, Björn B. Brandenburg","doi":"10.1109/rtss52674.2021.00039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Determining a soft or firm real-time task's probabilistic worst-case response time is a central goal when quantifying and bounding the probability of deadline misses, but current approaches are either (i) fast, but coarse-grained analytical bounds without precision guarantees, (ii) based on convolution and suffer from high space and time complexity, or (iii) combine convolution with resampling techniques that accrue pessimism in an uncontrolled manner. As a new alternative, this paper provides the first probabilistic response-time analysis method based on Monte Carlo simulation, which provides a controlled trade-off between analysis runtime, the desired degree of accuracy, and the permissible probability of a misestimate. An evaluation shows the proposed Monte Carlo analysis to routinely provide more accurate worst-case deadline failure probability (WCDFP) estimates than prior approaches, especially when considering large task sets (where prior methods struggle). In particular, it is shown to scale to workloads with up to 500 tasks while achieving one to three orders of magnitude better precision than analytical or convolution-based approaches (given an equivalent time budget).","PeriodicalId":102789,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monte Carlo Response-Time Analysis\",\"authors\":\"S. Bozhko, G. V. D. Brüggen, Björn B. Brandenburg\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/rtss52674.2021.00039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Determining a soft or firm real-time task's probabilistic worst-case response time is a central goal when quantifying and bounding the probability of deadline misses, but current approaches are either (i) fast, but coarse-grained analytical bounds without precision guarantees, (ii) based on convolution and suffer from high space and time complexity, or (iii) combine convolution with resampling techniques that accrue pessimism in an uncontrolled manner. As a new alternative, this paper provides the first probabilistic response-time analysis method based on Monte Carlo simulation, which provides a controlled trade-off between analysis runtime, the desired degree of accuracy, and the permissible probability of a misestimate. An evaluation shows the proposed Monte Carlo analysis to routinely provide more accurate worst-case deadline failure probability (WCDFP) estimates than prior approaches, especially when considering large task sets (where prior methods struggle). In particular, it is shown to scale to workloads with up to 500 tasks while achieving one to three orders of magnitude better precision than analytical or convolution-based approaches (given an equivalent time budget).\",\"PeriodicalId\":102789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/rtss52674.2021.00039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/rtss52674.2021.00039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

确定软或硬实时任务的概率最坏情况响应时间是量化和限定截止日期错过概率的中心目标,但目前的方法要么是(i)快速,但没有精度保证的粗粒度分析边界,(ii)基于卷积且具有高空间和时间复杂性,或者(iii)将卷积与重采样技术结合起来,以不受控制的方式积累悲观情绪。作为一种新的选择,本文提出了基于蒙特卡罗模拟的概率响应时间分析方法,该方法在分析运行时、期望的准确度和允许的错误估计概率之间提供了一种可控的权衡。一项评估表明,所提出的蒙特卡罗分析通常比先前的方法提供更准确的最坏情况截止日期失败概率(WCDFP)估计,特别是在考虑大型任务集时(先前的方法难以做到)。特别是,它可以扩展到多达500个任务的工作负载,同时比基于分析或卷积的方法(给定相同的时间预算)实现一到三个数量级的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Monte Carlo Response-Time Analysis
Determining a soft or firm real-time task's probabilistic worst-case response time is a central goal when quantifying and bounding the probability of deadline misses, but current approaches are either (i) fast, but coarse-grained analytical bounds without precision guarantees, (ii) based on convolution and suffer from high space and time complexity, or (iii) combine convolution with resampling techniques that accrue pessimism in an uncontrolled manner. As a new alternative, this paper provides the first probabilistic response-time analysis method based on Monte Carlo simulation, which provides a controlled trade-off between analysis runtime, the desired degree of accuracy, and the permissible probability of a misestimate. An evaluation shows the proposed Monte Carlo analysis to routinely provide more accurate worst-case deadline failure probability (WCDFP) estimates than prior approaches, especially when considering large task sets (where prior methods struggle). In particular, it is shown to scale to workloads with up to 500 tasks while achieving one to three orders of magnitude better precision than analytical or convolution-based approaches (given an equivalent time budget).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信