在澳大利亚废除电子监控

M. Martinovic
{"title":"在澳大利亚废除电子监控","authors":"M. Martinovic","doi":"10.1080/09627251.2014.902200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"©2013 Centre for Crime and Justice Studies 10.1080/09627251.2014.902200 Who says that punitive forms of electronic monitoring (EM) are expanding everywhere? The EM-home detention programme in Victoria was abolished in 2011 by the conservative coalition parties, which formed the state government in late 2010. Programme closure was a part of coalition parties’ wider agenda of ‘improving sentencing practices and enhancing community protection by ‘getting tough on crime.’ Other law and order reforms included abolishing suspended sentences, tougher minimum sentences for serious offences, extra police on the street, and the introduction of Victoria Police Protective Services Officers at train stations. Although at first hand it simply seems that a populist political ‘tough on crime’ agenda resulted in the closure of the EM-home detention programme, an important underlying issue over the years had been that the programme struggled to attract sufficient offender numbers due to a lack of stakeholders’ support. This too however, reflected a sense that EM – at least radio frequency EM, used for curfews and home confinement – for all the rhetoric associated with it, was just not punitive enough.","PeriodicalId":432339,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Matters","volume":"389 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abolishing electronic monitoring in Australia\",\"authors\":\"M. Martinovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09627251.2014.902200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"©2013 Centre for Crime and Justice Studies 10.1080/09627251.2014.902200 Who says that punitive forms of electronic monitoring (EM) are expanding everywhere? The EM-home detention programme in Victoria was abolished in 2011 by the conservative coalition parties, which formed the state government in late 2010. Programme closure was a part of coalition parties’ wider agenda of ‘improving sentencing practices and enhancing community protection by ‘getting tough on crime.’ Other law and order reforms included abolishing suspended sentences, tougher minimum sentences for serious offences, extra police on the street, and the introduction of Victoria Police Protective Services Officers at train stations. Although at first hand it simply seems that a populist political ‘tough on crime’ agenda resulted in the closure of the EM-home detention programme, an important underlying issue over the years had been that the programme struggled to attract sufficient offender numbers due to a lack of stakeholders’ support. This too however, reflected a sense that EM – at least radio frequency EM, used for curfews and home confinement – for all the rhetoric associated with it, was just not punitive enough.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Criminal Justice Matters\",\"volume\":\"389 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Criminal Justice Matters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09627251.2014.902200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Justice Matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09627251.2014.902200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

©2013犯罪与司法研究中心10.1080/09627251.2014.902200谁说惩罚性形式的电子监控(EM)无处不在?维多利亚州的家庭拘留计划于2011年被保守的联盟党废除,这些政党于2010年底组建了维多利亚州政府。该计划的结束是联合政党“通过严厉打击犯罪来改善量刑实践和加强社区保护”这一更广泛议程的一部分。其他的法律和秩序改革包括废除缓刑,对严重犯罪更严厉的最低刑罚,在街上增加警察,在火车站引入维多利亚警察保护服务人员。虽然乍一看,民粹主义的政治“严厉打击犯罪”议程导致了家庭拘留计划的关闭,但多年来一个重要的潜在问题是,由于缺乏利益相关者的支持,该计划难以吸引足够的罪犯人数。然而,这也反映出一种感觉,即电磁管制——至少是用于宵禁和居家隔离的射频电磁管制——尽管有各种与之相关的说辞,但惩罚力度还不够。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abolishing electronic monitoring in Australia
©2013 Centre for Crime and Justice Studies 10.1080/09627251.2014.902200 Who says that punitive forms of electronic monitoring (EM) are expanding everywhere? The EM-home detention programme in Victoria was abolished in 2011 by the conservative coalition parties, which formed the state government in late 2010. Programme closure was a part of coalition parties’ wider agenda of ‘improving sentencing practices and enhancing community protection by ‘getting tough on crime.’ Other law and order reforms included abolishing suspended sentences, tougher minimum sentences for serious offences, extra police on the street, and the introduction of Victoria Police Protective Services Officers at train stations. Although at first hand it simply seems that a populist political ‘tough on crime’ agenda resulted in the closure of the EM-home detention programme, an important underlying issue over the years had been that the programme struggled to attract sufficient offender numbers due to a lack of stakeholders’ support. This too however, reflected a sense that EM – at least radio frequency EM, used for curfews and home confinement – for all the rhetoric associated with it, was just not punitive enough.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信