使用比例风险-比例几率的加速寿命试验设计

Tingting Huang, T. Jiang
{"title":"使用比例风险-比例几率的加速寿命试验设计","authors":"Tingting Huang, T. Jiang","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.2010.5448032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"D-optimality is adopted in the optimum design of accelerated life testing in recent years. However, for some cases, the optimization results tend to approach the extreme stress levels and processing accelerated life testing under such stress levels would not obtain much information about lifetime and reliability of the test units. This paper presents an optimum design of constant stress accelerated life testing based on proportional hazardsproportional odds using penalized local D-optimality. It establishes the objective function as the product of the Fisher information matrix as defined in proportional hazardsproportional odds model and penalty functions which describe the ‘closeness’ of the probability density functions of two specified stress levels. Optimization results are obtained by maximizing the objective function subject to certain constraints. This optimum method avoids obtaining limit stress levels of test planning using D-optimality for some cases. Simulation study is given finally. The comparison of the optimization results by D-optimality and penalized local Doptimality shows that optimization results using penalized local D-optimality is more reasonable.","PeriodicalId":299782,"journal":{"name":"2010 Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design of accelerated life testing using proportional hazards-proportional odds\",\"authors\":\"Tingting Huang, T. Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RAMS.2010.5448032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"D-optimality is adopted in the optimum design of accelerated life testing in recent years. However, for some cases, the optimization results tend to approach the extreme stress levels and processing accelerated life testing under such stress levels would not obtain much information about lifetime and reliability of the test units. This paper presents an optimum design of constant stress accelerated life testing based on proportional hazardsproportional odds using penalized local D-optimality. It establishes the objective function as the product of the Fisher information matrix as defined in proportional hazardsproportional odds model and penalty functions which describe the ‘closeness’ of the probability density functions of two specified stress levels. Optimization results are obtained by maximizing the objective function subject to certain constraints. This optimum method avoids obtaining limit stress levels of test planning using D-optimality for some cases. Simulation study is given finally. The comparison of the optimization results by D-optimality and penalized local Doptimality shows that optimization results using penalized local D-optimality is more reasonable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2010.5448032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.2010.5448032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

近年来,加速寿命试验的优化设计采用了d -最优方法。然而,在某些情况下,优化结果倾向于接近极端应力水平,在这种应力水平下进行加速寿命试验将无法获得关于试验单元寿命和可靠性的太多信息。本文提出了一种基于比例风险和比例几率的恒应力加速寿命试验的优化设计方法,该方法采用惩罚局部d -最优性。它将目标函数建立为比例风险比例几率模型中定义的Fisher信息矩阵和描述两个特定应力水平的概率密度函数的“接近度”的惩罚函数的乘积。在一定的约束条件下,通过最大化目标函数来获得优化结果。这种优化方法避免了在某些情况下使用d -最优性获得测试计划的极限应力水平。最后进行了仿真研究。将d -最优和惩罚局部d -最优的优化结果进行比较,结果表明惩罚局部d -最优的优化结果更为合理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design of accelerated life testing using proportional hazards-proportional odds
D-optimality is adopted in the optimum design of accelerated life testing in recent years. However, for some cases, the optimization results tend to approach the extreme stress levels and processing accelerated life testing under such stress levels would not obtain much information about lifetime and reliability of the test units. This paper presents an optimum design of constant stress accelerated life testing based on proportional hazardsproportional odds using penalized local D-optimality. It establishes the objective function as the product of the Fisher information matrix as defined in proportional hazardsproportional odds model and penalty functions which describe the ‘closeness’ of the probability density functions of two specified stress levels. Optimization results are obtained by maximizing the objective function subject to certain constraints. This optimum method avoids obtaining limit stress levels of test planning using D-optimality for some cases. Simulation study is given finally. The comparison of the optimization results by D-optimality and penalized local Doptimality shows that optimization results using penalized local D-optimality is more reasonable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信