{"title":"评价湖泊景观:上界和下界","authors":"K. Rotthoff, Frank D. Tinari","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2435690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Valuing a useable but not market-traded asset has historically been difficult. The development of willingness-to-pay studies has allowed for two different techniques: stated preference technique, which uses the contingent valuation method, and a revealed preference technique, using existing markets (such as the housing market) to analyze differences in prices. We use existing literature on both techniques to estimate a lower- and upper- bound value for lake amenities in northeast United States.","PeriodicalId":296454,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Rivers","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Valuing a Lake Amenity: An Upper and Lower Bound\",\"authors\":\"K. Rotthoff, Frank D. Tinari\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2435690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Valuing a useable but not market-traded asset has historically been difficult. The development of willingness-to-pay studies has allowed for two different techniques: stated preference technique, which uses the contingent valuation method, and a revealed preference technique, using existing markets (such as the housing market) to analyze differences in prices. We use existing literature on both techniques to estimate a lower- and upper- bound value for lake amenities in northeast United States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: Rivers\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: Rivers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2435690\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Rivers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2435690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Valuing a useable but not market-traded asset has historically been difficult. The development of willingness-to-pay studies has allowed for two different techniques: stated preference technique, which uses the contingent valuation method, and a revealed preference technique, using existing markets (such as the housing market) to analyze differences in prices. We use existing literature on both techniques to estimate a lower- and upper- bound value for lake amenities in northeast United States.