评价湖泊景观:上界和下界

SRPN: Rivers Pub Date : 2014-05-11 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2435690
K. Rotthoff, Frank D. Tinari
{"title":"评价湖泊景观:上界和下界","authors":"K. Rotthoff, Frank D. Tinari","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2435690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Valuing a useable but not market-traded asset has historically been difficult. The development of willingness-to-pay studies has allowed for two different techniques: stated preference technique, which uses the contingent valuation method, and a revealed preference technique, using existing markets (such as the housing market) to analyze differences in prices. We use existing literature on both techniques to estimate a lower- and upper- bound value for lake amenities in northeast United States.","PeriodicalId":296454,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Rivers","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Valuing a Lake Amenity: An Upper and Lower Bound\",\"authors\":\"K. Rotthoff, Frank D. Tinari\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2435690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Valuing a useable but not market-traded asset has historically been difficult. The development of willingness-to-pay studies has allowed for two different techniques: stated preference technique, which uses the contingent valuation method, and a revealed preference technique, using existing markets (such as the housing market) to analyze differences in prices. We use existing literature on both techniques to estimate a lower- and upper- bound value for lake amenities in northeast United States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: Rivers\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: Rivers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2435690\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Rivers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2435690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对可用但非市场交易的资产进行估值历来很困难。支付意愿研究的发展允许使用两种不同的技术:陈述偏好技术,它使用条件评估方法,以及显示偏好技术,使用现有市场(如住房市场)来分析价格差异。我们使用两种技术的现有文献来估计美国东北部湖泊便利设施的下限和上限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Valuing a Lake Amenity: An Upper and Lower Bound
Valuing a useable but not market-traded asset has historically been difficult. The development of willingness-to-pay studies has allowed for two different techniques: stated preference technique, which uses the contingent valuation method, and a revealed preference technique, using existing markets (such as the housing market) to analyze differences in prices. We use existing literature on both techniques to estimate a lower- and upper- bound value for lake amenities in northeast United States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信