Way Sekampung水坝开发工程主坝稳定性渗流分析

Tommy Andreant, L. Afriani, O. T. Purwadi, Andius D. Saputra
{"title":"Way Sekampung水坝开发工程主坝稳定性渗流分析","authors":"Tommy Andreant, L. Afriani, O. T. Purwadi, Andius D. Saputra","doi":"10.23960/josst.v1i1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analysis using depression line method was conducted in two conditions, at normal water level (± 124 m) with a result of 1.11 × 10-3 m3/s and at flood water level ± 126.5 m with result 1.33 × 10-3 m3/s. Capacity shows (< 1%) the average enters the reservoir, making it safe from the danger of distress. Safety calculations for pipping showed a bigger value than the filtration flow speed indication at the average value of 4,638 ( > 4) which means that dam will not make pipping symptoms. Analysis conducted on the slope of the dam using slice method without entering the value of seismic coefficient obtained a safe number result in all loading conditions and the analysis by adding a seismic coefficient get a safe result except in two conditions, at elevation ± 126.5 m is  SF 1.05 and at elevation ± 124 m SF is 1.05.","PeriodicalId":153391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainability Science and Technology","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The seepage flow analysis of main dam stability in Way Sekampung dam development project\",\"authors\":\"Tommy Andreant, L. Afriani, O. T. Purwadi, Andius D. Saputra\",\"doi\":\"10.23960/josst.v1i1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Analysis using depression line method was conducted in two conditions, at normal water level (± 124 m) with a result of 1.11 × 10-3 m3/s and at flood water level ± 126.5 m with result 1.33 × 10-3 m3/s. Capacity shows (< 1%) the average enters the reservoir, making it safe from the danger of distress. Safety calculations for pipping showed a bigger value than the filtration flow speed indication at the average value of 4,638 ( > 4) which means that dam will not make pipping symptoms. Analysis conducted on the slope of the dam using slice method without entering the value of seismic coefficient obtained a safe number result in all loading conditions and the analysis by adding a seismic coefficient get a safe result except in two conditions, at elevation ± 126.5 m is  SF 1.05 and at elevation ± 124 m SF is 1.05.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sustainability Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sustainability Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23960/josst.v1i1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainability Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23960/josst.v1i1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在正常水位(±124 m)和洪水水位(±126.5 m)两种情况下,分别进行了1.11 × 10-3 m3/s和1.33 × 10-3 m3/s的降线分析。容量显示(< 1%)平均进入水库,使其免于危难的危险。渗水安全计算值大于过滤流速指示值的平均值4638(> 4),说明大坝不会出现渗水症状。在不输入地震系数值的情况下,采用分层法对坝体边坡进行分析,在所有荷载工况下均得到安全数值结果,除高程±126.5 m处SF为1.05和高程±124 m处SF为1.05外,采用加地震系数分析均得到安全结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The seepage flow analysis of main dam stability in Way Sekampung dam development project
Analysis using depression line method was conducted in two conditions, at normal water level (± 124 m) with a result of 1.11 × 10-3 m3/s and at flood water level ± 126.5 m with result 1.33 × 10-3 m3/s. Capacity shows (< 1%) the average enters the reservoir, making it safe from the danger of distress. Safety calculations for pipping showed a bigger value than the filtration flow speed indication at the average value of 4,638 ( > 4) which means that dam will not make pipping symptoms. Analysis conducted on the slope of the dam using slice method without entering the value of seismic coefficient obtained a safe number result in all loading conditions and the analysis by adding a seismic coefficient get a safe result except in two conditions, at elevation ± 126.5 m is  SF 1.05 and at elevation ± 124 m SF is 1.05.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信