以企业社会责任策略打击贪污

M. Arafa
{"title":"以企业社会责任策略打击贪污","authors":"M. Arafa","doi":"10.18060/17658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following analysis falls into three sections. Having established the conceptual and ethical groundwork in Part One, Part Two contains an analysis of CSR principles. Part Three examines the role of CSR in battling unethical behavior, especially corruption, through anti-corruption policies and other measures for combating this phenomenon with particular emphasis on the 2003 United Nations (U.N.) Convention against Corruption. To clarify the analysis, this article focuses on the following two sets of inquiries: First, are corporations cognizant of the relevant anti-corruption conventions and soft-law instruments? How do they perceive these measures? What impact, if any, have these conventions had on companies? Have corporations adjusted or changed their behavior as a result? Second, have corporations voluntarily adopted codes of conduct or other internal measures that promote CSR? Do these measures include a commitment to confronting bribery or corrupt behavior internally and on the part of their agents and those in their supply chain? Is CSR a useful and effective tool in tackling corruption generally? If so, to what extent? This Note concludes in Part Four by arguing that CSR should be a priority among practitioners in fighting unethical corporate behavior.“The advent of globalization has brought about unprecedented changes in the pace and nature of business practices in both the community market place and the work place. In the context of an evermore connected and inter-reliant world, intense demand for economic growth pressures societies to address myriad environmental, economic, social, and health issues facing populations, businesses, and governments.”Nothing erodes sustainable economic development more than corruption. Given its systemic pervasiveness, the private sector plays a critical role and has a vested interest in assuming social as well as economic responsibility. Though implementation rests firmly in the hands of national governments, corporations cannot ignore their critical role in creating a sustainable anti-corruption initiative. Looking ahead, companies face several challenges.However, the private sector can generate viable solutions to fight corruption by serving as a role model to the larger business community. Through collaboration with government and civil society in knowledge-sharing forums, through creation of an ethical corporate culture via increased responsibilities, and through innovative solutions to reduce the risk of corruption in corporate governance, the private sector can make a significant impact. CSR practitioners must prioritize the battle against corruption. It is important to focus on specific goals and policies and build upon the current mechanisms developed by the international community, especially the U.N. Convention.The CSR movement possesses the potential to strengthen commitments made by state parties by developing model theories into everyday business practice. Therefore, it should be concerned with protecting and promoting integrity, stability, and good governance while encouraging the disruption and control of serious crime. Through such commitments, states will increase the well being of their national economies, institutions and enterprises and promote a better understanding of the real and practical risks facing business today.","PeriodicalId":230320,"journal":{"name":"Indiana international and comparative law review","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Battling Corruption within a Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy\",\"authors\":\"M. Arafa\",\"doi\":\"10.18060/17658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The following analysis falls into three sections. Having established the conceptual and ethical groundwork in Part One, Part Two contains an analysis of CSR principles. Part Three examines the role of CSR in battling unethical behavior, especially corruption, through anti-corruption policies and other measures for combating this phenomenon with particular emphasis on the 2003 United Nations (U.N.) Convention against Corruption. To clarify the analysis, this article focuses on the following two sets of inquiries: First, are corporations cognizant of the relevant anti-corruption conventions and soft-law instruments? How do they perceive these measures? What impact, if any, have these conventions had on companies? Have corporations adjusted or changed their behavior as a result? Second, have corporations voluntarily adopted codes of conduct or other internal measures that promote CSR? Do these measures include a commitment to confronting bribery or corrupt behavior internally and on the part of their agents and those in their supply chain? Is CSR a useful and effective tool in tackling corruption generally? If so, to what extent? This Note concludes in Part Four by arguing that CSR should be a priority among practitioners in fighting unethical corporate behavior.“The advent of globalization has brought about unprecedented changes in the pace and nature of business practices in both the community market place and the work place. In the context of an evermore connected and inter-reliant world, intense demand for economic growth pressures societies to address myriad environmental, economic, social, and health issues facing populations, businesses, and governments.”Nothing erodes sustainable economic development more than corruption. Given its systemic pervasiveness, the private sector plays a critical role and has a vested interest in assuming social as well as economic responsibility. Though implementation rests firmly in the hands of national governments, corporations cannot ignore their critical role in creating a sustainable anti-corruption initiative. Looking ahead, companies face several challenges.However, the private sector can generate viable solutions to fight corruption by serving as a role model to the larger business community. Through collaboration with government and civil society in knowledge-sharing forums, through creation of an ethical corporate culture via increased responsibilities, and through innovative solutions to reduce the risk of corruption in corporate governance, the private sector can make a significant impact. CSR practitioners must prioritize the battle against corruption. It is important to focus on specific goals and policies and build upon the current mechanisms developed by the international community, especially the U.N. Convention.The CSR movement possesses the potential to strengthen commitments made by state parties by developing model theories into everyday business practice. Therefore, it should be concerned with protecting and promoting integrity, stability, and good governance while encouraging the disruption and control of serious crime. Through such commitments, states will increase the well being of their national economies, institutions and enterprises and promote a better understanding of the real and practical risks facing business today.\",\"PeriodicalId\":230320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indiana international and comparative law review\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indiana international and comparative law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18060/17658\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana international and comparative law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/17658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

下面的分析分为三个部分。在第一部分建立了概念和伦理基础之后,第二部分对企业社会责任原则进行了分析。第三部分考察了企业社会责任在打击不道德行为中的作用,特别是腐败,通过反腐败政策和其他措施来打击这一现象,特别强调2003年联合国(un)反腐败公约。为了澄清这一分析,本文主要关注以下两组问题:第一,企业是否认识到相关的反腐败公约和软法律文书?他们如何看待这些措施?这些惯例对公司有什么影响(如果有的话)?企业是否因此调整或改变了自己的行为?第二,企业是否自愿采用了促进企业社会责任的行为准则或其他内部措施?这些措施是否包括承诺打击内部、代理商和供应链上的贿赂或腐败行为?企业社会责任在打击贪污方面是否有用及有效?如果是,到什么程度?本文第四部分的结论是,企业社会责任应该成为从业者打击不道德企业行为的优先事项。“全球化的到来给社区市场和工作场所的商业实践的速度和性质带来了前所未有的变化。在一个联系日益紧密、相互依赖的世界背景下,对经济增长的强烈需求迫使社会解决人口、企业和政府面临的无数环境、经济、社会和健康问题。”没有什么比腐败更能侵蚀可持续的经济发展了。鉴于其系统性的普遍性,私营部门发挥着关键作用,在承担社会和经济责任方面具有既得利益。虽然执行工作牢牢掌握在各国政府手中,但企业不能忽视它们在创建可持续反腐败倡议方面的关键作用。展望未来,企业面临着几个挑战。然而,私营部门可以通过为更大的商界树立榜样,提出可行的解决办法来打击腐败。通过在知识共享论坛上与政府和民间社会合作,通过增加责任创造道德企业文化,以及通过创新解决方案减少公司治理中的腐败风险,私营部门可以产生重大影响。企业社会责任从业者必须优先打击腐败。要聚焦具体目标和政策,充分利用国际社会现有机制,特别是联合国公约。企业社会责任运动具有通过将模型理论发展到日常商业实践中来加强缔约国所作承诺的潜力。因此,它应该关注保护和促进廉正、稳定和良好治理,同时鼓励破坏和控制严重犯罪。通过这些承诺,各国将增进本国经济、机构和企业的福祉,并促进人们更好地了解当今企业面临的真实和实际风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Battling Corruption within a Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy
The following analysis falls into three sections. Having established the conceptual and ethical groundwork in Part One, Part Two contains an analysis of CSR principles. Part Three examines the role of CSR in battling unethical behavior, especially corruption, through anti-corruption policies and other measures for combating this phenomenon with particular emphasis on the 2003 United Nations (U.N.) Convention against Corruption. To clarify the analysis, this article focuses on the following two sets of inquiries: First, are corporations cognizant of the relevant anti-corruption conventions and soft-law instruments? How do they perceive these measures? What impact, if any, have these conventions had on companies? Have corporations adjusted or changed their behavior as a result? Second, have corporations voluntarily adopted codes of conduct or other internal measures that promote CSR? Do these measures include a commitment to confronting bribery or corrupt behavior internally and on the part of their agents and those in their supply chain? Is CSR a useful and effective tool in tackling corruption generally? If so, to what extent? This Note concludes in Part Four by arguing that CSR should be a priority among practitioners in fighting unethical corporate behavior.“The advent of globalization has brought about unprecedented changes in the pace and nature of business practices in both the community market place and the work place. In the context of an evermore connected and inter-reliant world, intense demand for economic growth pressures societies to address myriad environmental, economic, social, and health issues facing populations, businesses, and governments.”Nothing erodes sustainable economic development more than corruption. Given its systemic pervasiveness, the private sector plays a critical role and has a vested interest in assuming social as well as economic responsibility. Though implementation rests firmly in the hands of national governments, corporations cannot ignore their critical role in creating a sustainable anti-corruption initiative. Looking ahead, companies face several challenges.However, the private sector can generate viable solutions to fight corruption by serving as a role model to the larger business community. Through collaboration with government and civil society in knowledge-sharing forums, through creation of an ethical corporate culture via increased responsibilities, and through innovative solutions to reduce the risk of corruption in corporate governance, the private sector can make a significant impact. CSR practitioners must prioritize the battle against corruption. It is important to focus on specific goals and policies and build upon the current mechanisms developed by the international community, especially the U.N. Convention.The CSR movement possesses the potential to strengthen commitments made by state parties by developing model theories into everyday business practice. Therefore, it should be concerned with protecting and promoting integrity, stability, and good governance while encouraging the disruption and control of serious crime. Through such commitments, states will increase the well being of their national economies, institutions and enterprises and promote a better understanding of the real and practical risks facing business today.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信