欧亚超国家主义:从学术话语到欧亚经济联盟

Artur Simonyan
{"title":"欧亚超国家主义:从学术话语到欧亚经济联盟","authors":"Artur Simonyan","doi":"10.1163/22115897_02001_005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The profound institutionalisation of the European Union through supranationalism ensured universal standing for the Euro-centric interpretation of this concept in comparative legal and political studies. This Chapter, in opposition, validates the regional interpretation of supranationalism in post-Soviet Eurasian space and its variation both in academic discourse and regional legal practices. The Chapter primarily scrutinises the legal-historical deconstruction of the concept of supranationalism in the post-Soviet Eurasian region within three academic communities: Eurasianist, Soviet, and Post-Soviet. The Chapter’s interpretation of the concept of supranationalism is conducted through a re-evaluation of regional attitudes towards the concepts of sovereignty and typology of States and their function in shaping the Eurasian vision of supranationalism. When necessary, the conceptual framework is also widened to subsume the observation of other relevant phenomena, considering the specificity of each academic community conditioned upon time and ideological affiliation. Ultimately, Russian-Eurasian academic discourse on supranationalism is projected over the institutional law of the Eurasian Economic Union to ascertain the interrelation between academic percipience and regional law. Central prominence is shifted towards the institutional decision-making mechanism of the Eurasian Union and the role of the EAEU Court in shaping the concept of supranationalism. The Chapter concludes that regional attitudes have constructed an authoritarian, illiberal type of supranationalism typical of emerging Post-Soviet Eurasian regional international law.","PeriodicalId":261948,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eurasian Supranationalism: From Academic Discourse to the Eurasian Economic Union\",\"authors\":\"Artur Simonyan\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22115897_02001_005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The profound institutionalisation of the European Union through supranationalism ensured universal standing for the Euro-centric interpretation of this concept in comparative legal and political studies. This Chapter, in opposition, validates the regional interpretation of supranationalism in post-Soviet Eurasian space and its variation both in academic discourse and regional legal practices. The Chapter primarily scrutinises the legal-historical deconstruction of the concept of supranationalism in the post-Soviet Eurasian region within three academic communities: Eurasianist, Soviet, and Post-Soviet. The Chapter’s interpretation of the concept of supranationalism is conducted through a re-evaluation of regional attitudes towards the concepts of sovereignty and typology of States and their function in shaping the Eurasian vision of supranationalism. When necessary, the conceptual framework is also widened to subsume the observation of other relevant phenomena, considering the specificity of each academic community conditioned upon time and ideological affiliation. Ultimately, Russian-Eurasian academic discourse on supranationalism is projected over the institutional law of the Eurasian Economic Union to ascertain the interrelation between academic percipience and regional law. Central prominence is shifted towards the institutional decision-making mechanism of the Eurasian Union and the role of the EAEU Court in shaping the concept of supranationalism. The Chapter concludes that regional attitudes have constructed an authoritarian, illiberal type of supranationalism typical of emerging Post-Soviet Eurasian regional international law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":261948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22115897_02001_005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22115897_02001_005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟通过超国家主义的深刻制度化确保了在比较法律和政治研究中以欧洲为中心的解释这一概念的普遍地位。与此相反,本章验证了后苏联欧亚空间中超国家主义的区域解释及其在学术话语和区域法律实践中的变化。本章主要在三个学术团体中审视后苏联欧亚地区超国家主义概念的法律-历史解构:欧亚主义者、苏联和后苏联。本章对超国家主义概念的解释是通过重新评估区域对主权和国家类型概念的态度以及它们在塑造欧亚超国家主义愿景中的作用来进行的。必要时,概念框架也被扩大到包括对其他相关现象的观察,考虑到每个学术团体受时间和意识形态从属关系的特殊性。最后,俄罗斯-欧亚关于超国家主义的学术话语被投射到欧亚经济联盟的制度法律之上,以确定学术感知与地区法律之间的相互关系。重点转向欧亚联盟的制度性决策机制和欧亚联盟法院在塑造超国家主义概念方面的作用。本章的结论是,地区态度构建了一种专制的、非自由的超国家主义,这是后苏联时代欧亚地区国际法的典型特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eurasian Supranationalism: From Academic Discourse to the Eurasian Economic Union
The profound institutionalisation of the European Union through supranationalism ensured universal standing for the Euro-centric interpretation of this concept in comparative legal and political studies. This Chapter, in opposition, validates the regional interpretation of supranationalism in post-Soviet Eurasian space and its variation both in academic discourse and regional legal practices. The Chapter primarily scrutinises the legal-historical deconstruction of the concept of supranationalism in the post-Soviet Eurasian region within three academic communities: Eurasianist, Soviet, and Post-Soviet. The Chapter’s interpretation of the concept of supranationalism is conducted through a re-evaluation of regional attitudes towards the concepts of sovereignty and typology of States and their function in shaping the Eurasian vision of supranationalism. When necessary, the conceptual framework is also widened to subsume the observation of other relevant phenomena, considering the specificity of each academic community conditioned upon time and ideological affiliation. Ultimately, Russian-Eurasian academic discourse on supranationalism is projected over the institutional law of the Eurasian Economic Union to ascertain the interrelation between academic percipience and regional law. Central prominence is shifted towards the institutional decision-making mechanism of the Eurasian Union and the role of the EAEU Court in shaping the concept of supranationalism. The Chapter concludes that regional attitudes have constructed an authoritarian, illiberal type of supranationalism typical of emerging Post-Soviet Eurasian regional international law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信