迈向自动化决策系统的系统审查

Abe Chauhan
{"title":"迈向自动化决策系统的系统审查","authors":"Abe Chauhan","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2020.1871714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. The UK is moving towards a system of governance by algorithm. Public authorities at the national and local levels are replacing human decision-makers with algorithmic tools that deconstruct complex issues of policy “into neatly defined, structured and well-scoped problems that can be solved [mathematically]”. This technological overhaul of public administration is forecast to bring more efficient governance, reducing costs and delays, while also removing human error and increasing transparency and consistency. However, far from neutral and infallible mathematical tools, algorithms are products of human creation which can be impressed with tendencies towards bias and error andwhich can evade proper scrutiny because of technical features, proprietary interests, or issues of scale. The emergence of a digital technocratic state consequently raises a number of challenges for upholding the rule of law and principles of good governance.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards the Systemic Review of Automated Decision-Making Systems\",\"authors\":\"Abe Chauhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2020.1871714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1. The UK is moving towards a system of governance by algorithm. Public authorities at the national and local levels are replacing human decision-makers with algorithmic tools that deconstruct complex issues of policy “into neatly defined, structured and well-scoped problems that can be solved [mathematically]”. This technological overhaul of public administration is forecast to bring more efficient governance, reducing costs and delays, while also removing human error and increasing transparency and consistency. However, far from neutral and infallible mathematical tools, algorithms are products of human creation which can be impressed with tendencies towards bias and error andwhich can evade proper scrutiny because of technical features, proprietary interests, or issues of scale. The emergence of a digital technocratic state consequently raises a number of challenges for upholding the rule of law and principles of good governance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2020.1871714\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2020.1871714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1. 英国正朝着算法治理体系的方向发展。国家和地方各级的公共当局正在用算法工具取代人类决策者,这些算法工具将复杂的政策问题“解构为可以(用数学)解决的定义清晰、结构清晰、范围广泛的问题”。预计这种公共行政的技术改革将带来更有效的治理,减少成本和延误,同时消除人为错误,提高透明度和一致性。然而,算法远非中立和绝对可靠的数学工具,它是人类创造的产物,可能会给人留下偏见和错误的印象,并且可能由于技术特征、专有利益或规模问题而逃避适当的审查。因此,数字技术官僚国家的出现为维护法治和善治原则提出了一系列挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards the Systemic Review of Automated Decision-Making Systems
1. The UK is moving towards a system of governance by algorithm. Public authorities at the national and local levels are replacing human decision-makers with algorithmic tools that deconstruct complex issues of policy “into neatly defined, structured and well-scoped problems that can be solved [mathematically]”. This technological overhaul of public administration is forecast to bring more efficient governance, reducing costs and delays, while also removing human error and increasing transparency and consistency. However, far from neutral and infallible mathematical tools, algorithms are products of human creation which can be impressed with tendencies towards bias and error andwhich can evade proper scrutiny because of technical features, proprietary interests, or issues of scale. The emergence of a digital technocratic state consequently raises a number of challenges for upholding the rule of law and principles of good governance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信