基于LoRaWAN的RSSI指纹定位方法的可重复性比较

Grigorios G. Anagnostopoulos, Alexandros Kalousis
{"title":"基于LoRaWAN的RSSI指纹定位方法的可重复性比较","authors":"Grigorios G. Anagnostopoulos, Alexandros Kalousis","doi":"10.1109/WPNC47567.2019.8970177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of fingerprinting localization techniques in outdoor IoT settings has started gaining popularity over the recent years. Communication signals of Low Power Wide Area Networks (LPWAN), such as LoRaWAN, are used to estimate the location of low power mobile devices. In this study, a publicly available dataset of LoRaWAN RSSI measurements is utilized to compare different machine learning methods and their accuracy in producing location estimates. The tested methods are: the k Nearest Neighbours method, the Extra Trees method and a neural network approach using a Multilayer Perceptron. To facilitate the reproducibility of tests and the comparability of results, the code and the train/validation/test split of the dataset used in this study have become available. The neural network approach was the method with the highest accuracy, achieving a mean error of 357 meters and a median error of 206 meters.","PeriodicalId":284815,"journal":{"name":"2019 16th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communications (WPNC)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Reproducible Comparison of RSSI Fingerprinting Localization Methods Using LoRaWAN\",\"authors\":\"Grigorios G. Anagnostopoulos, Alexandros Kalousis\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WPNC47567.2019.8970177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of fingerprinting localization techniques in outdoor IoT settings has started gaining popularity over the recent years. Communication signals of Low Power Wide Area Networks (LPWAN), such as LoRaWAN, are used to estimate the location of low power mobile devices. In this study, a publicly available dataset of LoRaWAN RSSI measurements is utilized to compare different machine learning methods and their accuracy in producing location estimates. The tested methods are: the k Nearest Neighbours method, the Extra Trees method and a neural network approach using a Multilayer Perceptron. To facilitate the reproducibility of tests and the comparability of results, the code and the train/validation/test split of the dataset used in this study have become available. The neural network approach was the method with the highest accuracy, achieving a mean error of 357 meters and a median error of 206 meters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":284815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 16th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communications (WPNC)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 16th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communications (WPNC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WPNC47567.2019.8970177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 16th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communications (WPNC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WPNC47567.2019.8970177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

近年来,在室外物联网环境中使用指纹定位技术已经开始普及。LoRaWAN等低功率广域网(Low Power Wide Area Networks, LPWAN)的通信信号主要用于估计低功率移动设备的位置。在本研究中,利用公开可用的LoRaWAN RSSI测量数据集来比较不同的机器学习方法及其在产生位置估计中的准确性。测试的方法是:k近邻方法,额外树方法和使用多层感知器的神经网络方法。为了促进测试的可重复性和结果的可比性,本研究中使用的数据集的代码和训练/验证/测试分割已经可用。神经网络方法是精度最高的方法,平均误差为357米,中位数误差为206米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Reproducible Comparison of RSSI Fingerprinting Localization Methods Using LoRaWAN
The use of fingerprinting localization techniques in outdoor IoT settings has started gaining popularity over the recent years. Communication signals of Low Power Wide Area Networks (LPWAN), such as LoRaWAN, are used to estimate the location of low power mobile devices. In this study, a publicly available dataset of LoRaWAN RSSI measurements is utilized to compare different machine learning methods and their accuracy in producing location estimates. The tested methods are: the k Nearest Neighbours method, the Extra Trees method and a neural network approach using a Multilayer Perceptron. To facilitate the reproducibility of tests and the comparability of results, the code and the train/validation/test split of the dataset used in this study have become available. The neural network approach was the method with the highest accuracy, achieving a mean error of 357 meters and a median error of 206 meters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信