评估将基准管理纳入智利建筑业的管理实践的方法建议

Cristian Opitz Garcia, J. Garrido, Tito Oswaldo Castillo Campoverde, Luis Fernando Alarcón Cárdenas
{"title":"评估将基准管理纳入智利建筑业的管理实践的方法建议","authors":"Cristian Opitz Garcia, J. Garrido, Tito Oswaldo Castillo Campoverde, Luis Fernando Alarcón Cárdenas","doi":"10.55033/ejmrv4n1-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Chilean construction market has grown considerably in recent years. This progress has generated strong competition among companies, which has forced a constant search for new strategies to generate a continuous improvement of their processes, to achieve better overall results. Among strategies for continuous improvement, it is possible to find tools such as Benchmarking, which involves knowing your own and your competitors’ performance, to meet the  gaps. This research is aimed to develop a methodology for evaluating management practices of construction companies based on interviews which could be used as complement of the previous one developed by the Production Management Centre of the Catholic University of Chile at 2014, which was based on questionnaires. Research methodology consists of a literature review, revision of data collected during previous Benchmarking, definition of criteria to be considered in the new methodology and finally developing a questionnaire to interview managers or department heads to visualize how companies manage aspects such as production planning and scheduling, suppliers and innovation, among others. This is related to previous methodologies used to evaluate management practices worldwide in areas such as education, retail, manufacturing and health. A pilot experience was carried out on two construction companies to assess performance of the new tool in terms of application form, evaluation form, practices evaluated, among others. The interviews were conducted with key positions in the management of the company in areas such as production, quality, suppliers and others. The application of the new methodology allowed to observe major organizational differences between both companies and to understand aspects related to the interviews, such as: time of application, validation questions used, selection of respondents, among others. Previous experience will be used to correct and improve possible mistakes to be used in the future.","PeriodicalId":209904,"journal":{"name":"Europub Journal of Multidisciplinary Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodological proposal to assess management practices for incorporating benchmarking into the chilean construction industry\",\"authors\":\"Cristian Opitz Garcia, J. Garrido, Tito Oswaldo Castillo Campoverde, Luis Fernando Alarcón Cárdenas\",\"doi\":\"10.55033/ejmrv4n1-003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Chilean construction market has grown considerably in recent years. This progress has generated strong competition among companies, which has forced a constant search for new strategies to generate a continuous improvement of their processes, to achieve better overall results. Among strategies for continuous improvement, it is possible to find tools such as Benchmarking, which involves knowing your own and your competitors’ performance, to meet the  gaps. This research is aimed to develop a methodology for evaluating management practices of construction companies based on interviews which could be used as complement of the previous one developed by the Production Management Centre of the Catholic University of Chile at 2014, which was based on questionnaires. Research methodology consists of a literature review, revision of data collected during previous Benchmarking, definition of criteria to be considered in the new methodology and finally developing a questionnaire to interview managers or department heads to visualize how companies manage aspects such as production planning and scheduling, suppliers and innovation, among others. This is related to previous methodologies used to evaluate management practices worldwide in areas such as education, retail, manufacturing and health. A pilot experience was carried out on two construction companies to assess performance of the new tool in terms of application form, evaluation form, practices evaluated, among others. The interviews were conducted with key positions in the management of the company in areas such as production, quality, suppliers and others. The application of the new methodology allowed to observe major organizational differences between both companies and to understand aspects related to the interviews, such as: time of application, validation questions used, selection of respondents, among others. Previous experience will be used to correct and improve possible mistakes to be used in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":209904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Europub Journal of Multidisciplinary Research\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Europub Journal of Multidisciplinary Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55033/ejmrv4n1-003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europub Journal of Multidisciplinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55033/ejmrv4n1-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,智利建筑市场增长迅速。这种进步在公司之间产生了激烈的竞争,这迫使公司不断寻求新的战略,以不断改进其流程,以实现更好的总体结果。在持续改进的策略中,有可能找到诸如Benchmarking之类的工具,它涉及了解您自己和竞争对手的表现,以弥补差距。本研究旨在开发一种基于访谈的评估建筑公司管理实践的方法,该方法可作为2014年智利天主教大学生产管理中心基于问卷调查开发的先前方法的补充。研究方法包括文献综述,在以前的基准测试中收集的数据的修订,在新方法中要考虑的标准的定义,最后开发一份问卷来采访经理或部门负责人,以可视化公司如何管理方面,如生产计划和调度,供应商和创新等。这与以前用于评估教育、零售、制造和卫生等领域的全球管理实践的方法有关。我们在两家建筑公司进行了试点,以评估新工具在申请表、评估表、评估实践等方面的表现。采访对象是公司管理部门的关键职位,包括生产、质量、供应商等。新方法的应用允许观察两家公司之间的主要组织差异,并了解与面试相关的方面,例如:应用时间,使用的验证问题,受访者的选择等等。以前的经验将被用来纠正和改进可能的错误,以备将来使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methodological proposal to assess management practices for incorporating benchmarking into the chilean construction industry
The Chilean construction market has grown considerably in recent years. This progress has generated strong competition among companies, which has forced a constant search for new strategies to generate a continuous improvement of their processes, to achieve better overall results. Among strategies for continuous improvement, it is possible to find tools such as Benchmarking, which involves knowing your own and your competitors’ performance, to meet the  gaps. This research is aimed to develop a methodology for evaluating management practices of construction companies based on interviews which could be used as complement of the previous one developed by the Production Management Centre of the Catholic University of Chile at 2014, which was based on questionnaires. Research methodology consists of a literature review, revision of data collected during previous Benchmarking, definition of criteria to be considered in the new methodology and finally developing a questionnaire to interview managers or department heads to visualize how companies manage aspects such as production planning and scheduling, suppliers and innovation, among others. This is related to previous methodologies used to evaluate management practices worldwide in areas such as education, retail, manufacturing and health. A pilot experience was carried out on two construction companies to assess performance of the new tool in terms of application form, evaluation form, practices evaluated, among others. The interviews were conducted with key positions in the management of the company in areas such as production, quality, suppliers and others. The application of the new methodology allowed to observe major organizational differences between both companies and to understand aspects related to the interviews, such as: time of application, validation questions used, selection of respondents, among others. Previous experience will be used to correct and improve possible mistakes to be used in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信