{"title":"圣经与释经方法:为什么把圣经当作正典来读?","authors":"Ken Stenstrup","doi":"10.1177/014610790303300405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the practical benefits of interpreting Scripture as a composite or collection. Based upon Comparative Midrash and Intertextuality, the work of James A. Sanders suggests most fundamentally that Scripture can serve as a paradigm for how one understands the divine working through the world. The study provides a brief overview of this method and then through a critical assessment presents general implications that result from employing the method.","PeriodicalId":227137,"journal":{"name":"Biblical Theology Bulletin: A Journal of Bible and Theology","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scripture and Interpretive Method: Why Read Scripture as Canon?\",\"authors\":\"Ken Stenstrup\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/014610790303300405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents the practical benefits of interpreting Scripture as a composite or collection. Based upon Comparative Midrash and Intertextuality, the work of James A. Sanders suggests most fundamentally that Scripture can serve as a paradigm for how one understands the divine working through the world. The study provides a brief overview of this method and then through a critical assessment presents general implications that result from employing the method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":227137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biblical Theology Bulletin: A Journal of Bible and Theology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biblical Theology Bulletin: A Journal of Bible and Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/014610790303300405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biblical Theology Bulletin: A Journal of Bible and Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/014610790303300405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
这篇文章介绍了把《圣经》解释为合集或合集的实际好处。基于《比较米德拉什》和《互文性》，詹姆斯·a·桑德斯(James a . Sanders)的作品最根本的建议是，《圣经》可以作为一个范例，用于人们如何理解上帝在世界上的工作。该研究提供了该方法的简要概述，然后通过批判性评估提出了采用该方法的一般含义。
Scripture and Interpretive Method: Why Read Scripture as Canon?
This article presents the practical benefits of interpreting Scripture as a composite or collection. Based upon Comparative Midrash and Intertextuality, the work of James A. Sanders suggests most fundamentally that Scripture can serve as a paradigm for how one understands the divine working through the world. The study provides a brief overview of this method and then through a critical assessment presents general implications that result from employing the method.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
