局部差分隐私中隐私与效用的权衡

Mengqian Li, Youliang Tian, Junpeng Zhang, Dandan Fan, Dongmei Zhao
{"title":"局部差分隐私中隐私与效用的权衡","authors":"Mengqian Li, Youliang Tian, Junpeng Zhang, Dandan Fan, Dongmei Zhao","doi":"10.1109/NaNA53684.2021.00071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In statistical queries work, such as frequency estimation, the untrusted data collector could as an honest-but-curious (HbC) or malicious adversary to learn true values. Local differential privacy(LDP) protocols have been applied against the untrusted third party in data collecting. Nevertheless, excessive noise of LDP will reduce data utility, thus affecting the results of statistical queries. Therefore, it is significant to research the trade-off between privacy and utility. In this paper, we first measure the privacy loss by observing the maximum posterior confidence of the adversary (data collector). Then, through theoretical analysis and comparison we obtain the most suitable utility measure that is Wasserstein distance. Based on these, we introduce an originality framework for privacy-utility tradeoff framework, finding that this system conforms to the Pareto optimality state and formalizing a payoff function to find optimal equilibrium point under Pareto efficiency. Finally, we illustrate the efficacy of our system model by the Adult dataset from the UCI machine learning repository.","PeriodicalId":414672,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference on Networking and Network Applications (NaNA)","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Trade-off Between Privacy and Utility in Local Differential Privacy\",\"authors\":\"Mengqian Li, Youliang Tian, Junpeng Zhang, Dandan Fan, Dongmei Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NaNA53684.2021.00071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In statistical queries work, such as frequency estimation, the untrusted data collector could as an honest-but-curious (HbC) or malicious adversary to learn true values. Local differential privacy(LDP) protocols have been applied against the untrusted third party in data collecting. Nevertheless, excessive noise of LDP will reduce data utility, thus affecting the results of statistical queries. Therefore, it is significant to research the trade-off between privacy and utility. In this paper, we first measure the privacy loss by observing the maximum posterior confidence of the adversary (data collector). Then, through theoretical analysis and comparison we obtain the most suitable utility measure that is Wasserstein distance. Based on these, we introduce an originality framework for privacy-utility tradeoff framework, finding that this system conforms to the Pareto optimality state and formalizing a payoff function to find optimal equilibrium point under Pareto efficiency. Finally, we illustrate the efficacy of our system model by the Adult dataset from the UCI machine learning repository.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 International Conference on Networking and Network Applications (NaNA)\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 International Conference on Networking and Network Applications (NaNA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NaNA53684.2021.00071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference on Networking and Network Applications (NaNA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NaNA53684.2021.00071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在统计查询工作中,例如频率估计,不受信任的数据收集器可以作为诚实但好奇(HbC)或恶意对手来学习真实值。在数据收集过程中,采用LDP (Local differential privacy)协议来对抗不可信的第三方。然而,过多的LDP噪声会降低数据的效用,从而影响统计查询的结果。因此,研究隐私与效用之间的权衡具有重要意义。在本文中,我们首先通过观察对手(数据收集器)的最大后验置信度来度量隐私损失。然后,通过理论分析和比较,得出了最合适的效用度量,即沃瑟斯坦距离。在此基础上,我们引入了隐私-效用权衡框架的独创性框架,发现该系统符合帕累托最优状态,并形式化了一个支付函数来寻找帕累托效率下的最优平衡点。最后,我们通过UCI机器学习存储库中的成人数据集来说明我们的系统模型的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Trade-off Between Privacy and Utility in Local Differential Privacy
In statistical queries work, such as frequency estimation, the untrusted data collector could as an honest-but-curious (HbC) or malicious adversary to learn true values. Local differential privacy(LDP) protocols have been applied against the untrusted third party in data collecting. Nevertheless, excessive noise of LDP will reduce data utility, thus affecting the results of statistical queries. Therefore, it is significant to research the trade-off between privacy and utility. In this paper, we first measure the privacy loss by observing the maximum posterior confidence of the adversary (data collector). Then, through theoretical analysis and comparison we obtain the most suitable utility measure that is Wasserstein distance. Based on these, we introduce an originality framework for privacy-utility tradeoff framework, finding that this system conforms to the Pareto optimality state and formalizing a payoff function to find optimal equilibrium point under Pareto efficiency. Finally, we illustrate the efficacy of our system model by the Adult dataset from the UCI machine learning repository.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信