灵活的产品动态偏好

Aydın Alptekinoğlu, Karthik Ramachandran
{"title":"灵活的产品动态偏好","authors":"Aydın Alptekinoğlu, Karthik Ramachandran","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2037631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consumers often have needs that change in a dynamic fashion over time due to physiological, mental or environmental variations. We develop a model to address a product strategy question on how to satisfy dynamic consumer preferences: Should a firm offer multiple standard products, each designed for a specific purpose (e.g., several specialized golf clubs), or a flexible product that can be reconfigured by consumers as their preferences change (e.g., one adjustable golf club)? Often the latter approach is fueled by new technology, like the dial-a-dose system that Novo Nordisk invented and perfected over the years for its insulin pens. We find that products that deliver a high utility to consumers are ideal candidates for flexible designs, as higher utility encourages reconfiguration and justifies a higher flexibility premium. This offers an explanation as to why flexible products are typically sold at significant premiums over their ‘inflexible’ counterparts. We also discover a non-obvious relationship between optimal product strategy and dynamic consumer preferences. Intuition suggests that product flexibility would be more valuable when consumer preferences are more dynamic in the sense of changing more often. On the contrary, we find that a flexible product may lead to higher profits than a portfolio of standard products when consumer preferences are more stable. While higher stability in preferences reduces the frequency of reconfigurations, it also increases the value of each reconfiguration when preference shifts do occur. Finally, we also investigate the impact of heterogeneity in consumer preferences. We find that it can lead to a hybrid product strategy being optimal, where offering a mix of flexible and standard products enables efficient price discrimination between high- and low-end consumers.","PeriodicalId":275253,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research eJournal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flexible Products for Dynamic Preferences\",\"authors\":\"Aydın Alptekinoğlu, Karthik Ramachandran\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2037631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Consumers often have needs that change in a dynamic fashion over time due to physiological, mental or environmental variations. We develop a model to address a product strategy question on how to satisfy dynamic consumer preferences: Should a firm offer multiple standard products, each designed for a specific purpose (e.g., several specialized golf clubs), or a flexible product that can be reconfigured by consumers as their preferences change (e.g., one adjustable golf club)? Often the latter approach is fueled by new technology, like the dial-a-dose system that Novo Nordisk invented and perfected over the years for its insulin pens. We find that products that deliver a high utility to consumers are ideal candidates for flexible designs, as higher utility encourages reconfiguration and justifies a higher flexibility premium. This offers an explanation as to why flexible products are typically sold at significant premiums over their ‘inflexible’ counterparts. We also discover a non-obvious relationship between optimal product strategy and dynamic consumer preferences. Intuition suggests that product flexibility would be more valuable when consumer preferences are more dynamic in the sense of changing more often. On the contrary, we find that a flexible product may lead to higher profits than a portfolio of standard products when consumer preferences are more stable. While higher stability in preferences reduces the frequency of reconfigurations, it also increases the value of each reconfiguration when preference shifts do occur. Finally, we also investigate the impact of heterogeneity in consumer preferences. We find that it can lead to a hybrid product strategy being optimal, where offering a mix of flexible and standard products enables efficient price discrimination between high- and low-end consumers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operations Research eJournal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operations Research eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2037631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2037631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

由于生理、心理或环境的变化,消费者的需求往往会随着时间的推移而动态变化。我们开发了一个模型来解决关于如何满足动态消费者偏好的产品策略问题:公司是否应该提供多种标准产品,每种产品都是为特定目的而设计的(例如,几种专门的高尔夫球杆),还是提供一种灵活的产品,可以根据消费者的偏好变化而重新配置(例如,一种可调节的高尔夫球杆)?后一种方法通常是由新技术推动的,比如诺和诺德(Novo Nordisk)多年来为其胰岛素笔发明并完善的“按剂量拨号”系统。我们发现,为消费者提供高实用性的产品是灵活设计的理想选择,因为更高的实用性鼓励重新配置,并证明更高的灵活性溢价是合理的。这就解释了为什么灵活的产品通常比“不灵活”的产品售价高得多。我们还发现最优产品策略与动态消费者偏好之间存在不明显的关系。直觉告诉我们,当消费者的偏好变化更频繁时,产品的灵活性就会更有价值。相反,我们发现当消费者偏好更稳定时,灵活产品可能比标准产品组合带来更高的利润。虽然偏好的高稳定性降低了重新配置的频率,但当偏好发生变化时,它也增加了每次重新配置的价值。最后,我们还研究了异质性对消费者偏好的影响。我们发现它可以导致混合产品策略是最优的,其中提供灵活和标准产品的组合可以有效地区分高端和低端消费者的价格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flexible Products for Dynamic Preferences
Consumers often have needs that change in a dynamic fashion over time due to physiological, mental or environmental variations. We develop a model to address a product strategy question on how to satisfy dynamic consumer preferences: Should a firm offer multiple standard products, each designed for a specific purpose (e.g., several specialized golf clubs), or a flexible product that can be reconfigured by consumers as their preferences change (e.g., one adjustable golf club)? Often the latter approach is fueled by new technology, like the dial-a-dose system that Novo Nordisk invented and perfected over the years for its insulin pens. We find that products that deliver a high utility to consumers are ideal candidates for flexible designs, as higher utility encourages reconfiguration and justifies a higher flexibility premium. This offers an explanation as to why flexible products are typically sold at significant premiums over their ‘inflexible’ counterparts. We also discover a non-obvious relationship between optimal product strategy and dynamic consumer preferences. Intuition suggests that product flexibility would be more valuable when consumer preferences are more dynamic in the sense of changing more often. On the contrary, we find that a flexible product may lead to higher profits than a portfolio of standard products when consumer preferences are more stable. While higher stability in preferences reduces the frequency of reconfigurations, it also increases the value of each reconfiguration when preference shifts do occur. Finally, we also investigate the impact of heterogeneity in consumer preferences. We find that it can lead to a hybrid product strategy being optimal, where offering a mix of flexible and standard products enables efficient price discrimination between high- and low-end consumers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信