COVID-19患者直接抗凝剂替代方案的研究

G. Rodoman, T. I. Shalaeva, M. Ivzhits, Svetlana Rustamovna Zeynalova, I. Trubnikova, E. Popova, Firyuza Omarovna Makhmudova
{"title":"COVID-19患者直接抗凝剂替代方案的研究","authors":"G. Rodoman, T. I. Shalaeva, M. Ivzhits, Svetlana Rustamovna Zeynalova, I. Trubnikova, E. Popova, Firyuza Omarovna Makhmudova","doi":"10.33920/med-15-2201-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, the use of anticoagulants is a mandatory component of the complex therapy of COVID-19. Regarding the choice of drugs and their dosages, there is no consensus yet. Increasing doses reduces the risk of thrombosis, but at the same time increases the risk of bleeding, which is a common event in severe COVID-19. This makes it relevant to study alternative options for thromboprophylaxis. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral sulodexide and dabigatran etexilate in patients with COVID-19. Sulodexide demonstrated the same clinical efficacy as dabigatran in the treatment of patients with a degree of lung damage not higher than CT-2, while the relief of the initially existing coagulopathy occurred significantly faster, and there was no excessive increase in thrombin time, characteristic of dabigatran.","PeriodicalId":437500,"journal":{"name":"Hirurg (Surgeon)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of an alternative to direct anticoagulants in COVID-19 patients\",\"authors\":\"G. Rodoman, T. I. Shalaeva, M. Ivzhits, Svetlana Rustamovna Zeynalova, I. Trubnikova, E. Popova, Firyuza Omarovna Makhmudova\",\"doi\":\"10.33920/med-15-2201-06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, the use of anticoagulants is a mandatory component of the complex therapy of COVID-19. Regarding the choice of drugs and their dosages, there is no consensus yet. Increasing doses reduces the risk of thrombosis, but at the same time increases the risk of bleeding, which is a common event in severe COVID-19. This makes it relevant to study alternative options for thromboprophylaxis. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral sulodexide and dabigatran etexilate in patients with COVID-19. Sulodexide demonstrated the same clinical efficacy as dabigatran in the treatment of patients with a degree of lung damage not higher than CT-2, while the relief of the initially existing coagulopathy occurred significantly faster, and there was no excessive increase in thrombin time, characteristic of dabigatran.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hirurg (Surgeon)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hirurg (Surgeon)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33920/med-15-2201-06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hirurg (Surgeon)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33920/med-15-2201-06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,抗凝血剂的使用是COVID-19综合治疗的强制性组成部分。关于药物的选择和剂量,目前还没有达成共识。增加剂量可降低血栓形成的风险,但同时也会增加出血的风险,而出血是重症COVID-19的常见事件。这使得它相关的研究替代方案的血栓预防。本研究的目的是比较口服舒洛地特和达比加群酯在COVID-19患者中的疗效和安全性。舒洛地特治疗肺损伤程度不高于CT-2的患者的临床疗效与达比加群相同,但最初存在的凝血功能障碍的缓解明显更快,凝血酶时间没有过度增加,这是达比加群的特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of an alternative to direct anticoagulants in COVID-19 patients
Currently, the use of anticoagulants is a mandatory component of the complex therapy of COVID-19. Regarding the choice of drugs and their dosages, there is no consensus yet. Increasing doses reduces the risk of thrombosis, but at the same time increases the risk of bleeding, which is a common event in severe COVID-19. This makes it relevant to study alternative options for thromboprophylaxis. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral sulodexide and dabigatran etexilate in patients with COVID-19. Sulodexide demonstrated the same clinical efficacy as dabigatran in the treatment of patients with a degree of lung damage not higher than CT-2, while the relief of the initially existing coagulopathy occurred significantly faster, and there was no excessive increase in thrombin time, characteristic of dabigatran.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信