风电应用中不同风速预测模型的比较

T. Ayodele, R. Olarewaju, J. Munda
{"title":"风电应用中不同风速预测模型的比较","authors":"T. Ayodele, R. Olarewaju, J. Munda","doi":"10.1109/ROBOMECH.2019.8704793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the capability of prediction models is compared for wind speed forecast at different time horizons (i.e. very-short term, short-term, medium term and long term horizons) with the aim of determining their prediction accuracy. The models include: Persistence, second order Markov chain, autoregressive moving average (ARMA) and Weibull models. The models have applications in the areas of electricity market clearing, regulation actions and maintenance scheduling to achieve optimal operating cost. The data used for the study consist of ten-minute average wind speeds for Alexander Bay region of South Africa. Statistical measure and error measures were employed for model validation. The key result reveals that the autoregressive model is best suited for very short and long term wind speed prediction while second order Markov chain is the most appropriate model for short and medium term prediction. Persistence model appears to be the least accurate of all the models for all time horizons.","PeriodicalId":344332,"journal":{"name":"2019 Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference/Robotics and Mechatronics/Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa (SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Different Wind Speed Prediction Models for Wind Power Application\",\"authors\":\"T. Ayodele, R. Olarewaju, J. Munda\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ROBOMECH.2019.8704793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, the capability of prediction models is compared for wind speed forecast at different time horizons (i.e. very-short term, short-term, medium term and long term horizons) with the aim of determining their prediction accuracy. The models include: Persistence, second order Markov chain, autoregressive moving average (ARMA) and Weibull models. The models have applications in the areas of electricity market clearing, regulation actions and maintenance scheduling to achieve optimal operating cost. The data used for the study consist of ten-minute average wind speeds for Alexander Bay region of South Africa. Statistical measure and error measures were employed for model validation. The key result reveals that the autoregressive model is best suited for very short and long term wind speed prediction while second order Markov chain is the most appropriate model for short and medium term prediction. Persistence model appears to be the least accurate of all the models for all time horizons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference/Robotics and Mechatronics/Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa (SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference/Robotics and Mechatronics/Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa (SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOMECH.2019.8704793\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference/Robotics and Mechatronics/Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa (SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOMECH.2019.8704793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文比较了不同时间尺度(极短期、短期、中期和长期)风速预报模式的预报能力,以确定其预报精度。模型包括:持续模型、二阶马尔可夫链模型、自回归移动平均模型和威布尔模型。该模型可应用于电力市场结算、监管行动和维护调度等领域,以实现最优运行成本。这项研究使用的数据包括南非亚历山大湾地区10分钟的平均风速。采用统计度量和误差度量对模型进行验证。关键结果表明,自回归模型最适合于极短期和长期风速预测,二阶马尔可夫链模型最适合于中短期风速预测。对于所有的时间范围,持续模型似乎是所有模型中最不准确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Different Wind Speed Prediction Models for Wind Power Application
In this paper, the capability of prediction models is compared for wind speed forecast at different time horizons (i.e. very-short term, short-term, medium term and long term horizons) with the aim of determining their prediction accuracy. The models include: Persistence, second order Markov chain, autoregressive moving average (ARMA) and Weibull models. The models have applications in the areas of electricity market clearing, regulation actions and maintenance scheduling to achieve optimal operating cost. The data used for the study consist of ten-minute average wind speeds for Alexander Bay region of South Africa. Statistical measure and error measures were employed for model validation. The key result reveals that the autoregressive model is best suited for very short and long term wind speed prediction while second order Markov chain is the most appropriate model for short and medium term prediction. Persistence model appears to be the least accurate of all the models for all time horizons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信