口服类固醇治疗学龄前儿童急性喘息:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析

J. Murphy, C. King, B. Kapitein, R. Fernandes, A. Lilley, S. Messahel, D. Hawcutt, I. Sinha
{"title":"口服类固醇治疗学龄前儿童急性喘息:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"J. Murphy, C. King, B. Kapitein, R. Fernandes, A. Lilley, S. Messahel, D. Hawcutt, I. Sinha","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.oa4941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Benefits of oral corticosteroids (OCS) for acute preschool wheeze are unclear. Aim: Systematically review evidence for OCS in preschool children presenting to the emergency department (ED) or hospitalised with acute wheeze. Methods: We included randomised controlled trials of OCS vs placebo for children Results: Four studies were eligible. Risk of bias was generally low except for selective outcome reporting. OCS did not reduce risk of hospitalisation (Risk ratio 0.94,95%CI 0.80,1.12; Figure 1). Of 3 studies reporting LOS, 2 showed statistically but not clinically significant reduction (placebo 9 hours [IQR 2-16] vs OCS 6.2 [2–11.8] p0.04; and placebo 7.7 hours[5.0-22.9] versus OCS 6.8[4–14] p0.03). Atopic history, and interval symptoms were not consistently associated with better response to OCS. Severity and prior diagnosis of asthma were associated with response in one study. Conclusion: High quality evidence suggests OCS should not be used in the ED in acute preschool wheeze. Effects on those with known asthma or hospitalised with severe illness are uncertain.","PeriodicalId":114886,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric asthma and allergy","volume":"144 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral steroids for preschool children with acute wheeze: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"J. Murphy, C. King, B. Kapitein, R. Fernandes, A. Lilley, S. Messahel, D. Hawcutt, I. Sinha\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.oa4941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Benefits of oral corticosteroids (OCS) for acute preschool wheeze are unclear. Aim: Systematically review evidence for OCS in preschool children presenting to the emergency department (ED) or hospitalised with acute wheeze. Methods: We included randomised controlled trials of OCS vs placebo for children Results: Four studies were eligible. Risk of bias was generally low except for selective outcome reporting. OCS did not reduce risk of hospitalisation (Risk ratio 0.94,95%CI 0.80,1.12; Figure 1). Of 3 studies reporting LOS, 2 showed statistically but not clinically significant reduction (placebo 9 hours [IQR 2-16] vs OCS 6.2 [2–11.8] p0.04; and placebo 7.7 hours[5.0-22.9] versus OCS 6.8[4–14] p0.03). Atopic history, and interval symptoms were not consistently associated with better response to OCS. Severity and prior diagnosis of asthma were associated with response in one study. Conclusion: High quality evidence suggests OCS should not be used in the ED in acute preschool wheeze. Effects on those with known asthma or hospitalised with severe illness are uncertain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paediatric asthma and allergy\",\"volume\":\"144 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paediatric asthma and allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.oa4941\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric asthma and allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.oa4941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:口服皮质类固醇(OCS)治疗急性学龄前喘息的益处尚不清楚。目的:系统地回顾学龄前儿童在急诊科(ED)或因急性喘息住院的OCS证据。方法:我们纳入了儿童OCS与安慰剂的随机对照试验。结果:4项研究符合条件。除选择性结果报告外,偏倚风险一般较低。OCS未降低住院风险(风险比0.94,95%CI 0.80,1.12;图1)在报告LOS的3项研究中,2项显示统计学上但无临床意义的减少(安慰剂9小时[IQR 2-16] vs OCS 6.2 [2 - 11.8] p0.04;安慰剂组7.7小时[5.0-22.9],OCS组6.8小时[4-14]p0.03)。特应性病史和间歇期症状并不一致地与OCS的更好应答相关。在一项研究中,哮喘的严重程度和既往诊断与反应相关。结论:高质量的证据表明,OCS不应用于急性学龄前喘息的ED。对已知哮喘患者或因严重疾病住院的患者的影响尚不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oral steroids for preschool children with acute wheeze: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: Benefits of oral corticosteroids (OCS) for acute preschool wheeze are unclear. Aim: Systematically review evidence for OCS in preschool children presenting to the emergency department (ED) or hospitalised with acute wheeze. Methods: We included randomised controlled trials of OCS vs placebo for children Results: Four studies were eligible. Risk of bias was generally low except for selective outcome reporting. OCS did not reduce risk of hospitalisation (Risk ratio 0.94,95%CI 0.80,1.12; Figure 1). Of 3 studies reporting LOS, 2 showed statistically but not clinically significant reduction (placebo 9 hours [IQR 2-16] vs OCS 6.2 [2–11.8] p0.04; and placebo 7.7 hours[5.0-22.9] versus OCS 6.8[4–14] p0.03). Atopic history, and interval symptoms were not consistently associated with better response to OCS. Severity and prior diagnosis of asthma were associated with response in one study. Conclusion: High quality evidence suggests OCS should not be used in the ED in acute preschool wheeze. Effects on those with known asthma or hospitalised with severe illness are uncertain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信