基于问题的研究是否能够丰富荷兰学校课程的内容?

H. Hoeken
{"title":"基于问题的研究是否能够丰富荷兰学校课程的内容?","authors":"H. Hoeken","doi":"10.5117/TVT2018.2.002.HOEK","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this contribution, I argue that the two aims Carel Jansen proposes, are incompatible. A research agenda dominated by questions derived from practical problems will lead to a body of largely isolated insights and unrelated knowledge. Such an incoherent knowledge base is insufficient to provide an enrichment of the school subject Dutch language. A more theory guided research agenda eliciting and guiding empirical research that meets high standards of ecological validity could lead to such a knowledge base.","PeriodicalId":192335,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is probleemgestuurd onderzoek wel in staat om het schoolvak Nederlands inhoudelijk te verrijken?\",\"authors\":\"H. Hoeken\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/TVT2018.2.002.HOEK\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this contribution, I argue that the two aims Carel Jansen proposes, are incompatible. A research agenda dominated by questions derived from practical problems will lead to a body of largely isolated insights and unrelated knowledge. Such an incoherent knowledge base is insufficient to provide an enrichment of the school subject Dutch language. A more theory guided research agenda eliciting and guiding empirical research that meets high standards of ecological validity could lead to such a knowledge base.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/TVT2018.2.002.HOEK\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/TVT2018.2.002.HOEK","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我认为Carel Jansen提出的两个目标是不相容的。由来自实际问题的问题主导的研究议程将导致大量孤立的见解和不相关的知识。这种不连贯的知识库不足以丰富学校的荷兰语课程。更多的理论指导的研究议程引出和指导经验研究,满足高标准的生态有效性可能导致这样的知识基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is probleemgestuurd onderzoek wel in staat om het schoolvak Nederlands inhoudelijk te verrijken?
In this contribution, I argue that the two aims Carel Jansen proposes, are incompatible. A research agenda dominated by questions derived from practical problems will lead to a body of largely isolated insights and unrelated knowledge. Such an incoherent knowledge base is insufficient to provide an enrichment of the school subject Dutch language. A more theory guided research agenda eliciting and guiding empirical research that meets high standards of ecological validity could lead to such a knowledge base.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信