LRS外固定架治疗开放性IIIA型和IIIB型胫骨骨折

C. Vijay, L. MahendraKumarK, N. ManjappaC
{"title":"LRS外固定架治疗开放性IIIA型和IIIB型胫骨骨折","authors":"C. Vijay, L. MahendraKumarK, N. ManjappaC","doi":"10.5580/23a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Back ground: The specific method of skeletal fixation and soft tissue management in open fracture of tibia, one of the common fracture continues to be a topic of debate in orthopedic traumatology. The current study was done with an objective to assess the role of LRS external fixator in the management of open type IIIA and type IIIB fractures of the tibia.Materials and method: Out of the total 157 cases of open fractures of tibia encountered during the study period, 45 cases belonged to type IIIA and IIIB were treated by primary wound debridement and fracture stabilization with LRS external fixator. The surgery was aimed at achieving anatomical reduction, stable fixation and early soft tissue coverage to allow early mobilization. Average duration of the use of external fixator was 24 weeks. Using the principle of compression distraction osteogenesis, fracture union was enhanced by doing compression and distraction at the rate of 1 mm for every 10 days alternatively. Regular follow up done and the cases were assessed as per modified Andersons and Hutchins criteria. Additional procedures like bone grafting fibular osteotomy were performed for few patients.Results: Overall 90% of the fractures united well. While good to excellent results were seen in 28 cases amounting to 72%, moderate and poor results were observed in 18% and 10% of the cases respectively.Conclusion: The method of management using the LRS external fixator was found to be simple and effective for fracture stabilization in terms of easy access to soft tissue care, enable fracture union, early return to function and can be considered as an alternative choice fixation for type IIIA and type IIIB fracture both bone of leg with bone loss which lessens the economical burden and those patient not willing to undergo multiple procedures.","PeriodicalId":322846,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management Of Open Type IIIA And Type IIIB Fractures Tibia With LRS External Fixator\",\"authors\":\"C. Vijay, L. MahendraKumarK, N. ManjappaC\",\"doi\":\"10.5580/23a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Back ground: The specific method of skeletal fixation and soft tissue management in open fracture of tibia, one of the common fracture continues to be a topic of debate in orthopedic traumatology. The current study was done with an objective to assess the role of LRS external fixator in the management of open type IIIA and type IIIB fractures of the tibia.Materials and method: Out of the total 157 cases of open fractures of tibia encountered during the study period, 45 cases belonged to type IIIA and IIIB were treated by primary wound debridement and fracture stabilization with LRS external fixator. The surgery was aimed at achieving anatomical reduction, stable fixation and early soft tissue coverage to allow early mobilization. Average duration of the use of external fixator was 24 weeks. Using the principle of compression distraction osteogenesis, fracture union was enhanced by doing compression and distraction at the rate of 1 mm for every 10 days alternatively. Regular follow up done and the cases were assessed as per modified Andersons and Hutchins criteria. Additional procedures like bone grafting fibular osteotomy were performed for few patients.Results: Overall 90% of the fractures united well. While good to excellent results were seen in 28 cases amounting to 72%, moderate and poor results were observed in 18% and 10% of the cases respectively.Conclusion: The method of management using the LRS external fixator was found to be simple and effective for fracture stabilization in terms of easy access to soft tissue care, enable fracture union, early return to function and can be considered as an alternative choice fixation for type IIIA and type IIIB fracture both bone of leg with bone loss which lessens the economical burden and those patient not willing to undergo multiple procedures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5580/23a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/23a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:胫骨开放性骨折是骨科创伤学中常见的骨折之一,其骨固定和软组织处理的具体方法一直是一个有争议的话题。目前的研究目的是评估LRS外固定架在治疗开放性IIIA型和IIIB型胫骨骨折中的作用。材料与方法:本研究共收治157例开放性胫骨骨折,其中IIIA型和IIIB型45例采用LRS外固定架进行伤口清创和骨折稳定治疗。手术的目的是实现解剖复位,稳定固定和早期软组织覆盖,以便早期活动。外固定架的平均使用时间为24周。采用压迫牵张成骨原理,每10天交替进行1 mm的压迫牵张,促进骨折愈合。定期随访,并根据修改后的Andersons和Hutchins标准对病例进行评估。附加手术,如植骨,腓骨截骨,为少数患者进行。结果:90%骨折愈合良好。虽然有28例(72%)的结果为良好至优异,但分别有18%和10%的病例结果为中等和较差。结论:LRS外固定架处理方法简单,骨折稳定有效,易于获得软组织护理,骨折愈合,早日恢复功能,可作为IIIA型和IIIB型骨折双腿骨丢失的替代选择固定,减轻了经济负担,患者不愿进行多次手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management Of Open Type IIIA And Type IIIB Fractures Tibia With LRS External Fixator
Back ground: The specific method of skeletal fixation and soft tissue management in open fracture of tibia, one of the common fracture continues to be a topic of debate in orthopedic traumatology. The current study was done with an objective to assess the role of LRS external fixator in the management of open type IIIA and type IIIB fractures of the tibia.Materials and method: Out of the total 157 cases of open fractures of tibia encountered during the study period, 45 cases belonged to type IIIA and IIIB were treated by primary wound debridement and fracture stabilization with LRS external fixator. The surgery was aimed at achieving anatomical reduction, stable fixation and early soft tissue coverage to allow early mobilization. Average duration of the use of external fixator was 24 weeks. Using the principle of compression distraction osteogenesis, fracture union was enhanced by doing compression and distraction at the rate of 1 mm for every 10 days alternatively. Regular follow up done and the cases were assessed as per modified Andersons and Hutchins criteria. Additional procedures like bone grafting fibular osteotomy were performed for few patients.Results: Overall 90% of the fractures united well. While good to excellent results were seen in 28 cases amounting to 72%, moderate and poor results were observed in 18% and 10% of the cases respectively.Conclusion: The method of management using the LRS external fixator was found to be simple and effective for fracture stabilization in terms of easy access to soft tissue care, enable fracture union, early return to function and can be considered as an alternative choice fixation for type IIIA and type IIIB fracture both bone of leg with bone loss which lessens the economical burden and those patient not willing to undergo multiple procedures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信