设计真实利益:集体财产实践的框架

In Commons Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.35483/acsa.am.111.66
Gabriel Cueller
{"title":"设计真实利益:集体财产实践的框架","authors":"Gabriel Cueller","doi":"10.35483/acsa.am.111.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Real property, and its systems of landholding and land division, is virtually everywhere. As a fundamental infrastructure to territories and cities, property shapes, in great part, social relations, development, and spatial transformation. As designers always work in the context of a property system, it is important to have frameworks that allow them to interpret and understand how property operates, systemically and in the context of any given site. Furthermore, if they are to intervene in such systems, design methodologies are also needed. This project aims to provide such tools, emphasizing how social and environmental interdependence can facilitate the practice of property beyond the status quo. The terms “property” and “ownership” are often used interchangeably. The latter is less flexible, however, because, with “ownership,” there is little agency for anyone but the owner. This project builds on a concept that recognizes a wider set of stakeholders, and may give designers leverage: the interest. Interests include all the relations, stakes, obligations, and rights that an entity may have in land. Interests account for the many ways in which actors are involved in property, whether they own or don’t. The advantage of interpreting property through interests is that they capture varying degrees of interdependence, access, and ways of conceiving property boundaries. Through five scenarios, this project outlines a design approach working with property’s spatial and relational dimensions. Each scenario explores how property lines can interact with various kinds of interests, terms of collective use, land policy, and ecological and social relations. In this framework, designers may gain agency in tapping into the power that property mediates and tackling environmental change, housing affordability, and spatial segregation.","PeriodicalId":243862,"journal":{"name":"In Commons","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing Real Interests: A Framework for Collective Property Practices\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Cueller\",\"doi\":\"10.35483/acsa.am.111.66\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Real property, and its systems of landholding and land division, is virtually everywhere. As a fundamental infrastructure to territories and cities, property shapes, in great part, social relations, development, and spatial transformation. As designers always work in the context of a property system, it is important to have frameworks that allow them to interpret and understand how property operates, systemically and in the context of any given site. Furthermore, if they are to intervene in such systems, design methodologies are also needed. This project aims to provide such tools, emphasizing how social and environmental interdependence can facilitate the practice of property beyond the status quo. The terms “property” and “ownership” are often used interchangeably. The latter is less flexible, however, because, with “ownership,” there is little agency for anyone but the owner. This project builds on a concept that recognizes a wider set of stakeholders, and may give designers leverage: the interest. Interests include all the relations, stakes, obligations, and rights that an entity may have in land. Interests account for the many ways in which actors are involved in property, whether they own or don’t. The advantage of interpreting property through interests is that they capture varying degrees of interdependence, access, and ways of conceiving property boundaries. Through five scenarios, this project outlines a design approach working with property’s spatial and relational dimensions. Each scenario explores how property lines can interact with various kinds of interests, terms of collective use, land policy, and ecological and social relations. In this framework, designers may gain agency in tapping into the power that property mediates and tackling environmental change, housing affordability, and spatial segregation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In Commons\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In Commons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35483/acsa.am.111.66\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In Commons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35483/acsa.am.111.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不动产及其土地占有和土地分割制度实际上无处不在。作为领土和城市的基础设施,房地产在很大程度上决定着社会关系、发展和空间转型。由于设计师总是在一个物业系统的背景下工作,所以重要的是要有一个框架,让他们能够解释和理解物业是如何在任何给定的网站背景下系统地运作的。此外,如果他们要干预这样的系统,还需要设计方法。该项目旨在提供这样的工具,强调社会和环境的相互依存如何促进超越现状的财产实践。“财产”和“所有权”这两个术语经常可以互换使用。然而,后者的灵活性较差,因为对于“所有权”来说,除了所有者之外,其他人几乎没有代理权。这个项目建立在一个概念上,它认识到更广泛的利益相关者,并可能给设计师的杠杆:利益。利益包括一个实体在土地上可能拥有的所有关系、利害关系、义务和权利。利益决定了行为者参与财产的多种方式,无论他们是否拥有财产。通过利益来解释财产的优势在于,它们捕捉到了不同程度的相互依赖、获取和构思财产边界的方式。通过五个场景,该项目概述了一种与物业的空间和关系维度相结合的设计方法。每个场景都探讨了地产线如何与各种利益、集体使用条款、土地政策以及生态和社会关系相互作用。在这个框架下,设计师可以利用房地产中介的力量,解决环境变化、住房负担能力和空间隔离问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing Real Interests: A Framework for Collective Property Practices
Real property, and its systems of landholding and land division, is virtually everywhere. As a fundamental infrastructure to territories and cities, property shapes, in great part, social relations, development, and spatial transformation. As designers always work in the context of a property system, it is important to have frameworks that allow them to interpret and understand how property operates, systemically and in the context of any given site. Furthermore, if they are to intervene in such systems, design methodologies are also needed. This project aims to provide such tools, emphasizing how social and environmental interdependence can facilitate the practice of property beyond the status quo. The terms “property” and “ownership” are often used interchangeably. The latter is less flexible, however, because, with “ownership,” there is little agency for anyone but the owner. This project builds on a concept that recognizes a wider set of stakeholders, and may give designers leverage: the interest. Interests include all the relations, stakes, obligations, and rights that an entity may have in land. Interests account for the many ways in which actors are involved in property, whether they own or don’t. The advantage of interpreting property through interests is that they capture varying degrees of interdependence, access, and ways of conceiving property boundaries. Through five scenarios, this project outlines a design approach working with property’s spatial and relational dimensions. Each scenario explores how property lines can interact with various kinds of interests, terms of collective use, land policy, and ecological and social relations. In this framework, designers may gain agency in tapping into the power that property mediates and tackling environmental change, housing affordability, and spatial segregation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信