原位土壤试验的使用与相关性:CPD、CPE和LWD

Sonaly Mendes Arruda, Conrado Renan da Silva, Felipe Freitas Santos de Jesus, A. Lucena, Carina Silvani
{"title":"原位土壤试验的使用与相关性:CPD、CPE和LWD","authors":"Sonaly Mendes Arruda, Conrado Renan da Silva, Felipe Freitas Santos de Jesus, A. Lucena, Carina Silvani","doi":"10.4322/cobramseg.2022.0574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"comuns e menos dispendiosos, tais como o Cone de Penetração Dinâmica (CPD) e o Cone de Penetração Estática (CPE), e estabelecer correlações para a obtenção dos bons parâmetros. Neste estudo, realizou-se ensaios LWD, CPD e CPE, com solos do tipo A-2-4, A-6 e A-3, em um recipiente de dimensões determinadas, a fim de estabelecer correlações. Porém, conclui-se que é preciso ampliar a investigação geotécnica para melhorar a acurácia dos resultados encontrados, visto que não houve correlação com mais do que 63% de significância. ABSTRACT: The use of in situ tests is essential for the development of geotechnical works, as they allow to know the real conditions of support and soil condition. However, obtaining good geotechnical parameters requires the use of technological, complex and, consequently, expensive tests, such as the Light Weight Deflectometer (LWD). In the search for cost reduction, it is possible to use more common and less expensive tests, such as the Dynamic Cone Penetration (DCP) and the Static Cone Penetration (SCP), and to establish correlations to obtain the good parameters. In this study, LWD, CPD and CPE tests were performed, with soils of type A-2-4, A-6 and A-3, in a container of determined dimensions, in order to establish correlations. However, it is concluded that it is necessary to expand the geotechnical investigation to improve the accuracy of the results found, since there was no correlation with more than 63% of significance","PeriodicalId":206776,"journal":{"name":"Congresso Brasileiro de Mecânica dos Solos e Engenharia Geotécnica","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"USO E CORRELAÇÃO DE ENSAIOS DE SOLO IN SITU: CPD, CPE E LWD\",\"authors\":\"Sonaly Mendes Arruda, Conrado Renan da Silva, Felipe Freitas Santos de Jesus, A. Lucena, Carina Silvani\",\"doi\":\"10.4322/cobramseg.2022.0574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"comuns e menos dispendiosos, tais como o Cone de Penetração Dinâmica (CPD) e o Cone de Penetração Estática (CPE), e estabelecer correlações para a obtenção dos bons parâmetros. Neste estudo, realizou-se ensaios LWD, CPD e CPE, com solos do tipo A-2-4, A-6 e A-3, em um recipiente de dimensões determinadas, a fim de estabelecer correlações. Porém, conclui-se que é preciso ampliar a investigação geotécnica para melhorar a acurácia dos resultados encontrados, visto que não houve correlação com mais do que 63% de significância. ABSTRACT: The use of in situ tests is essential for the development of geotechnical works, as they allow to know the real conditions of support and soil condition. However, obtaining good geotechnical parameters requires the use of technological, complex and, consequently, expensive tests, such as the Light Weight Deflectometer (LWD). In the search for cost reduction, it is possible to use more common and less expensive tests, such as the Dynamic Cone Penetration (DCP) and the Static Cone Penetration (SCP), and to establish correlations to obtain the good parameters. In this study, LWD, CPD and CPE tests were performed, with soils of type A-2-4, A-6 and A-3, in a container of determined dimensions, in order to establish correlations. However, it is concluded that it is necessary to expand the geotechnical investigation to improve the accuracy of the results found, since there was no correlation with more than 63% of significance\",\"PeriodicalId\":206776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Congresso Brasileiro de Mecânica dos Solos e Engenharia Geotécnica\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Congresso Brasileiro de Mecânica dos Solos e Engenharia Geotécnica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4322/cobramseg.2022.0574\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Congresso Brasileiro de Mecânica dos Solos e Engenharia Geotécnica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4322/cobramseg.2022.0574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动态渗透锥(CPD)和静态渗透锥(CPE)等常用且成本较低的方法,并建立相关性以获得良好的参数。在本研究中,对A-2-4、A-6和A-3型土壤在一定尺寸的容器中进行了LWD、CPD和CPE试验,以建立相关性。然而,我们的结论是,有必要扩大岩土研究,以提高结果的准确性,因为相关性不超过63%的显著性。摘要:原位试验的使用对岩土工程的发展至关重要,因为它们可以了解支撑和土壤的实际情况。然而,要获得良好的岩土参数,就需要使用技术复杂,因此也需要进行昂贵的测试,例如轻重量偏转仪。为了降低成本,可以使用更常见和成本更低的测试方法,如动态锥贯入(DCP)和静态锥贯入(SCP),并建立相关性以获得良好的参数。在本研究中,为了建立相关性,对A-2-4、A-6和A-3型土壤进行了LWD、CPD和CPE试验。但是,得出的结论是,必须扩大岩土调查,以提高所发现结果的准确性,因为与显著性的63%以上没有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
USO E CORRELAÇÃO DE ENSAIOS DE SOLO IN SITU: CPD, CPE E LWD
comuns e menos dispendiosos, tais como o Cone de Penetração Dinâmica (CPD) e o Cone de Penetração Estática (CPE), e estabelecer correlações para a obtenção dos bons parâmetros. Neste estudo, realizou-se ensaios LWD, CPD e CPE, com solos do tipo A-2-4, A-6 e A-3, em um recipiente de dimensões determinadas, a fim de estabelecer correlações. Porém, conclui-se que é preciso ampliar a investigação geotécnica para melhorar a acurácia dos resultados encontrados, visto que não houve correlação com mais do que 63% de significância. ABSTRACT: The use of in situ tests is essential for the development of geotechnical works, as they allow to know the real conditions of support and soil condition. However, obtaining good geotechnical parameters requires the use of technological, complex and, consequently, expensive tests, such as the Light Weight Deflectometer (LWD). In the search for cost reduction, it is possible to use more common and less expensive tests, such as the Dynamic Cone Penetration (DCP) and the Static Cone Penetration (SCP), and to establish correlations to obtain the good parameters. In this study, LWD, CPD and CPE tests were performed, with soils of type A-2-4, A-6 and A-3, in a container of determined dimensions, in order to establish correlations. However, it is concluded that it is necessary to expand the geotechnical investigation to improve the accuracy of the results found, since there was no correlation with more than 63% of significance
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信