{"title":"面向机器的体系结构:Oikos和生态学","authors":"Levi R. Bryant","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474420570.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, following his ontology that focuses on what it means to give an account of something, Levi R. Bryant not only defines building as a machine, but building as a void and an enclosure where architecture operates in, through and on it. After elaborating on his argument that all of being is composed of machines, calling this metaphysics or ontology ‘machine-oriented ontology’, he goes onto sketching the outlines of a machine-oriented architecture and the ways in which distributions of space operate on bodies, create subjectivities and form communities. He concludes by asking what a revolutionary enclosure would be to connect it with our ability to create enclosures that act upon us and potentially enhance our becoming and movement.","PeriodicalId":250750,"journal":{"name":"Architectural Materialisms","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine-oriented Architecture: Oikos and Ecology\",\"authors\":\"Levi R. Bryant\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474420570.003.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this chapter, following his ontology that focuses on what it means to give an account of something, Levi R. Bryant not only defines building as a machine, but building as a void and an enclosure where architecture operates in, through and on it. After elaborating on his argument that all of being is composed of machines, calling this metaphysics or ontology ‘machine-oriented ontology’, he goes onto sketching the outlines of a machine-oriented architecture and the ways in which distributions of space operate on bodies, create subjectivities and form communities. He concludes by asking what a revolutionary enclosure would be to connect it with our ability to create enclosures that act upon us and potentially enhance our becoming and movement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":250750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Architectural Materialisms\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Architectural Materialisms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474420570.003.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architectural Materialisms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474420570.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在本章中,遵循他的本体论,关注对某事的描述意味着什么,Levi R. Bryant不仅将建筑定义为一台机器,而且将建筑定义为一个空间和一个圈地,建筑在其中运行,通过它并在其上运行。在详细阐述了他的观点,即所有的存在都是由机器组成的,称这种形而上学或本体论为“面向机器的本体论”之后,他接着描绘了一个面向机器的体系结构的轮廓,以及空间分布对身体的作用、创造主体性和形成社区的方式。他最后问了一个问题,什么是革命性的圈地,将它与我们创造圈地的能力联系起来,这些圈地对我们起作用,并有可能增强我们的成长和运动。
In this chapter, following his ontology that focuses on what it means to give an account of something, Levi R. Bryant not only defines building as a machine, but building as a void and an enclosure where architecture operates in, through and on it. After elaborating on his argument that all of being is composed of machines, calling this metaphysics or ontology ‘machine-oriented ontology’, he goes onto sketching the outlines of a machine-oriented architecture and the ways in which distributions of space operate on bodies, create subjectivities and form communities. He concludes by asking what a revolutionary enclosure would be to connect it with our ability to create enclosures that act upon us and potentially enhance our becoming and movement.