Kalvestene:对丹麦hjarnoø岛上的船只设置的重新评估

E. Sebo, C. Wiseman, J. Mccarthy, P. Baggaley, K. Jerbić, J. Benjamin
{"title":"Kalvestene:对丹麦hjarnoø岛上的船只设置的重新评估","authors":"E. Sebo, C. Wiseman, J. Mccarthy, P. Baggaley, K. Jerbić, J. Benjamin","doi":"10.1080/15564894.2021.1900955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The ship setting site on the island of Hjarnø, known as the Kalvestene (“the calf stones”), is a grave field made up of ten small ship settings dating to the Viking Age. Although it is a comparatively small site, textual evidence suggests that, surprisingly, the Kalvestene were well-known, at least in some parts of medieval Scandinavia. The site is unusual among Danish grave fields in that all the settings are ship shaped, with no surviving circle, oval, or triangle settings, mounds, or other monument types. It has been assumed that this anomaly is due to natural erosion and anthropogenic intervention because Ole Worm’s 1650 description and drawing of the site indicates there were once more than twenty settings, including circle settings. This article reconsiders that assumption using a range of interdisciplinary approaches and evidence. It critically analyzes medieval and early modern written records and surveys previous studies of this site (including those unpublished), offers a reinterpretation of geophysical data alongside aerial photogrammetric and LiDAR data, and presents the results of our survey of the Kalvestene. In particular, we aim to answer three questions: how accurate is Worm's study? How do the ship settings at Hjarnø compare to other Danish ship settings? And, why were the Kalvestene famous?","PeriodicalId":163306,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology","volume":"141 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Kalvestene: A reevaluation of the ship settings on the Danish island of Hjarnø\",\"authors\":\"E. Sebo, C. Wiseman, J. Mccarthy, P. Baggaley, K. Jerbić, J. Benjamin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15564894.2021.1900955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The ship setting site on the island of Hjarnø, known as the Kalvestene (“the calf stones”), is a grave field made up of ten small ship settings dating to the Viking Age. Although it is a comparatively small site, textual evidence suggests that, surprisingly, the Kalvestene were well-known, at least in some parts of medieval Scandinavia. The site is unusual among Danish grave fields in that all the settings are ship shaped, with no surviving circle, oval, or triangle settings, mounds, or other monument types. It has been assumed that this anomaly is due to natural erosion and anthropogenic intervention because Ole Worm’s 1650 description and drawing of the site indicates there were once more than twenty settings, including circle settings. This article reconsiders that assumption using a range of interdisciplinary approaches and evidence. It critically analyzes medieval and early modern written records and surveys previous studies of this site (including those unpublished), offers a reinterpretation of geophysical data alongside aerial photogrammetric and LiDAR data, and presents the results of our survey of the Kalvestene. In particular, we aim to answer three questions: how accurate is Worm's study? How do the ship settings at Hjarnø compare to other Danish ship settings? And, why were the Kalvestene famous?\",\"PeriodicalId\":163306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology\",\"volume\":\"141 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2021.1900955\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2021.1900955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

hjarnoø岛上的沉船遗址,被称为Kalvestene(“小牛的石头”),是一个由十艘小船组成的墓地,可以追溯到维京时代。虽然这是一个相对较小的遗址,但文字证据表明,令人惊讶的是,卡尔维斯特人是众所周知的,至少在中世纪斯堪的纳维亚半岛的某些地区是如此。该遗址在丹麦墓地中很不寻常,因为所有的设置都是船形的,没有幸存的圆形,椭圆形或三角形设置,土丘或其他纪念碑类型。据推测,这种异常是由于自然侵蚀和人为干预造成的,因为奥勒·沃姆(Ole Worm) 1650年对该地点的描述和绘图表明,曾经有20多个设置,包括圆形设置。本文使用一系列跨学科的方法和证据重新考虑了这一假设。它批判性地分析了中世纪和早期现代的书面记录,并调查了以前对该遗址的研究(包括那些未发表的研究),提供了对地球物理数据以及航空摄影测量和激光雷达数据的重新解释,并展示了我们对卡尔韦斯特尼的调查结果。特别是,我们的目标是回答三个问题:沃姆的研究有多准确?hjarnoø的船舶设置与其他丹麦船舶设置相比如何?为什么卡尔维斯汀出名?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Kalvestene: A reevaluation of the ship settings on the Danish island of Hjarnø
Abstract The ship setting site on the island of Hjarnø, known as the Kalvestene (“the calf stones”), is a grave field made up of ten small ship settings dating to the Viking Age. Although it is a comparatively small site, textual evidence suggests that, surprisingly, the Kalvestene were well-known, at least in some parts of medieval Scandinavia. The site is unusual among Danish grave fields in that all the settings are ship shaped, with no surviving circle, oval, or triangle settings, mounds, or other monument types. It has been assumed that this anomaly is due to natural erosion and anthropogenic intervention because Ole Worm’s 1650 description and drawing of the site indicates there were once more than twenty settings, including circle settings. This article reconsiders that assumption using a range of interdisciplinary approaches and evidence. It critically analyzes medieval and early modern written records and surveys previous studies of this site (including those unpublished), offers a reinterpretation of geophysical data alongside aerial photogrammetric and LiDAR data, and presents the results of our survey of the Kalvestene. In particular, we aim to answer three questions: how accurate is Worm's study? How do the ship settings at Hjarnø compare to other Danish ship settings? And, why were the Kalvestene famous?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信