复合材料板受拉破坏准则的评定

N. Rahimi, M. Rahim, A. Hussain, J. Mahmud
{"title":"复合材料板受拉破坏准则的评定","authors":"N. Rahimi, M. Rahim, A. Hussain, J. Mahmud","doi":"10.1109/SHUSER.2012.6269001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to explore the built-in failure criteria functions provided by ANSYS to simulate the failure behaviour of composite plates under tension. The first ply failure (FPF) load is determined and the results are used for the time to assess the accuracy of the available built-in failure criteria. Finite element (FE) models are developed using standard ANSYS formulation to replicate physical uni-axial tensile tests. The built-in failure criteria functions are explored and the available criteria (Maximum Stress and Tsai-Wu Failure Criteria) are used to determine the FPF load for a composite laminate, with a layup of (θ4/04/- θ4)s. The angle, θ, is varied from 0° to 90°. The results are compared with a (FE) implementation using Fortran and available experiment data. The FPF curves for both ANSYS and Fortran were plotted and found very close to the experiment results. By comparing the curves, the results are used to assess and evaluate the accuracy of the failure criteria. The results show that the current ANSYS and Fortran simulations produce a maximum average error of 16%. Using ANSYS, the Maximum Stress and Tsai-Wu criteria produce an average error of 5.78%, and 13.19% respectively. Using Fortran programme, Maximum Stress produces an average error of 1.36%. Despite larger error, simulations using ANSYS allows easier modification and manipulation. Moreover, the procedure of simulations has the potential to replace tedious and expensive physical testing. Therefore, it can be concluded the current study has successfully explored the built-in failure criteria functions in ANSYS to replicate experiments. Apparently, the current study is novel, useful and contributes significant knowledge in conducting failure analysis of composite laminates.","PeriodicalId":426671,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE Symposium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research","volume":"111 3S 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of failure criteria for composite plates under tension\",\"authors\":\"N. Rahimi, M. Rahim, A. Hussain, J. Mahmud\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SHUSER.2012.6269001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to explore the built-in failure criteria functions provided by ANSYS to simulate the failure behaviour of composite plates under tension. The first ply failure (FPF) load is determined and the results are used for the time to assess the accuracy of the available built-in failure criteria. Finite element (FE) models are developed using standard ANSYS formulation to replicate physical uni-axial tensile tests. The built-in failure criteria functions are explored and the available criteria (Maximum Stress and Tsai-Wu Failure Criteria) are used to determine the FPF load for a composite laminate, with a layup of (θ4/04/- θ4)s. The angle, θ, is varied from 0° to 90°. The results are compared with a (FE) implementation using Fortran and available experiment data. The FPF curves for both ANSYS and Fortran were plotted and found very close to the experiment results. By comparing the curves, the results are used to assess and evaluate the accuracy of the failure criteria. The results show that the current ANSYS and Fortran simulations produce a maximum average error of 16%. Using ANSYS, the Maximum Stress and Tsai-Wu criteria produce an average error of 5.78%, and 13.19% respectively. Using Fortran programme, Maximum Stress produces an average error of 1.36%. Despite larger error, simulations using ANSYS allows easier modification and manipulation. Moreover, the procedure of simulations has the potential to replace tedious and expensive physical testing. Therefore, it can be concluded the current study has successfully explored the built-in failure criteria functions in ANSYS to replicate experiments. Apparently, the current study is novel, useful and contributes significant knowledge in conducting failure analysis of composite laminates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 IEEE Symposium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research\",\"volume\":\"111 3S 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 IEEE Symposium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SHUSER.2012.6269001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE Symposium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SHUSER.2012.6269001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本文旨在探索ANSYS提供的内置破坏准则函数来模拟复合材料板在受拉作用下的破坏行为。确定第一层失效(FPF)载荷,并使用其结果来评估可用的内置失效标准的准确性。有限元(FE)模型开发使用标准的ANSYS公式来复制物理单轴拉伸试验。探索了内置的破坏准则函数,并使用可用的准则(最大应力和Tsai-Wu破坏准则)来确定层积为(θ4/04/- θ4)s的复合材料层合板的FPF载荷。角θ在0°到90°之间变化。结果与用Fortran实现的有限元模型和现有的实验数据进行了比较。绘制了ANSYS和Fortran的FPF曲线,发现与实验结果非常接近。通过对曲线的比较,对失效准则的准确性进行评估和评价。结果表明,目前ANSYS和Fortran仿真的最大平均误差为16%。在ANSYS中,最大应力准则和Tsai-Wu准则的平均误差分别为5.78%和13.19%。使用Fortran程序,最大应力产生的平均误差为1.36%。尽管误差较大,但使用ANSYS进行模拟可以更容易地进行修改和操作。此外,模拟过程有可能取代繁琐和昂贵的物理测试。因此,可以得出结论,本研究成功地探索了ANSYS中内置的失效准则函数来复制实验。显然,本研究新颖、实用,对复合材料层合板的失效分析具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of failure criteria for composite plates under tension
This paper aims to explore the built-in failure criteria functions provided by ANSYS to simulate the failure behaviour of composite plates under tension. The first ply failure (FPF) load is determined and the results are used for the time to assess the accuracy of the available built-in failure criteria. Finite element (FE) models are developed using standard ANSYS formulation to replicate physical uni-axial tensile tests. The built-in failure criteria functions are explored and the available criteria (Maximum Stress and Tsai-Wu Failure Criteria) are used to determine the FPF load for a composite laminate, with a layup of (θ4/04/- θ4)s. The angle, θ, is varied from 0° to 90°. The results are compared with a (FE) implementation using Fortran and available experiment data. The FPF curves for both ANSYS and Fortran were plotted and found very close to the experiment results. By comparing the curves, the results are used to assess and evaluate the accuracy of the failure criteria. The results show that the current ANSYS and Fortran simulations produce a maximum average error of 16%. Using ANSYS, the Maximum Stress and Tsai-Wu criteria produce an average error of 5.78%, and 13.19% respectively. Using Fortran programme, Maximum Stress produces an average error of 1.36%. Despite larger error, simulations using ANSYS allows easier modification and manipulation. Moreover, the procedure of simulations has the potential to replace tedious and expensive physical testing. Therefore, it can be concluded the current study has successfully explored the built-in failure criteria functions in ANSYS to replicate experiments. Apparently, the current study is novel, useful and contributes significant knowledge in conducting failure analysis of composite laminates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信