心脏手术后的院内活动:每日一次和两次运动对心脏自主神经调节的剂量效应研究

R. Mendes, C. B. Pantoni, R. Simões, Luciana Ditomaso Luporini, Flávia Cristina Rossi Caruso Bonjorno, E. Kabbach, A. Borghi Silva
{"title":"心脏手术后的院内活动:每日一次和两次运动对心脏自主神经调节的剂量效应研究","authors":"R. Mendes, C. B. Pantoni, R. Simões, Luciana Ditomaso Luporini, Flávia Cristina Rossi Caruso Bonjorno, E. Kabbach, A. Borghi Silva","doi":"10.4322/2675-9977.cpcr.42060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1  ; Audrey Borghi-Silva 1  Abstract Background: Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) implies in impairment of cardiac autonomic modulation (CAM). In-hospital mobilization positively affects CAM; however, it is not known whether higher exercise dosage would provide the same benefits in CAM as lower dosage in patients post-CABG. Aims: To investigate the dose-effect of an exercise inpatient program performed once or twice-daily on cardiac autonomic modulation post-CABG. Design: Prospective trial with a quasi-experimental design. Methods: Thirty patients of both sexes with a diagnosis of coronary heart disease and first-time post-CABG were allocated in a non-random manner into GEX1 (n = 10) and GEX2 (n = 10), composed of patients engaged in one and two daily exercise sessions plus usual care (breathing exercises, education with no systematized mobilization exercise program), respectively; and control group (CG, n = 10), composed of those who only received usual care. Patients underwent a mobilization protocol until discharge, which included a progressive five steps of active-assistive exercises of lower/upper limbs. Heart rate (HR) and R-wave intervals (RRi) were recorded by heart rate monitor at basal condition and discharge time. CAM was assessed by heart rate variability (HRV). Results: At discharge, the higher-dose group (GEX2) showed significant higher values of: parasympathetic (RMSSD: 7.9±1.3 ms vs 4.6±0.4 ms) and overall CAM indexes (STD RR: 7.5±1.1 ms vs 4.8±0.5 ms and TINN (38±6.4 ms vs 23±2.8 ms) compared with CG, respectively. In addition, mean HR (GEX2: 88.1 ±12.3 bpm; GEX1: 79.4±5.7 bpm, CG: 100.4±10.1 bpm) and mean RR (GEX2: 694.0±101.8 bpm; GEX1: 759.1±57.0 bpm, CG: 602.8±59.1 bpm) were different to exercise groups compared to controls regardless dosage. However, there was no significant difference between the exercise groups (GEX1 and GEX2). Conclusions: Regardless dosage, post-CABG patients who engaged in a mobilization-exercise program demonstrated better cardiac autonomic modulation at discharge compared with the control group. The results are encouraging further investigation in the field of in-hospital exercise rehabilitation dosage on cardiac autonomic modulation in a","PeriodicalId":164984,"journal":{"name":"Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy, Critical Care and Rehabilitation","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-hospital mobilization after cardiac surgery: investigation of a dose-effect of once- and twice-daily exercise on cardiac autonomic modulation\",\"authors\":\"R. Mendes, C. B. Pantoni, R. Simões, Luciana Ditomaso Luporini, Flávia Cristina Rossi Caruso Bonjorno, E. Kabbach, A. Borghi Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.4322/2675-9977.cpcr.42060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1  ; Audrey Borghi-Silva 1  Abstract Background: Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) implies in impairment of cardiac autonomic modulation (CAM). In-hospital mobilization positively affects CAM; however, it is not known whether higher exercise dosage would provide the same benefits in CAM as lower dosage in patients post-CABG. Aims: To investigate the dose-effect of an exercise inpatient program performed once or twice-daily on cardiac autonomic modulation post-CABG. Design: Prospective trial with a quasi-experimental design. Methods: Thirty patients of both sexes with a diagnosis of coronary heart disease and first-time post-CABG were allocated in a non-random manner into GEX1 (n = 10) and GEX2 (n = 10), composed of patients engaged in one and two daily exercise sessions plus usual care (breathing exercises, education with no systematized mobilization exercise program), respectively; and control group (CG, n = 10), composed of those who only received usual care. Patients underwent a mobilization protocol until discharge, which included a progressive five steps of active-assistive exercises of lower/upper limbs. Heart rate (HR) and R-wave intervals (RRi) were recorded by heart rate monitor at basal condition and discharge time. CAM was assessed by heart rate variability (HRV). Results: At discharge, the higher-dose group (GEX2) showed significant higher values of: parasympathetic (RMSSD: 7.9±1.3 ms vs 4.6±0.4 ms) and overall CAM indexes (STD RR: 7.5±1.1 ms vs 4.8±0.5 ms and TINN (38±6.4 ms vs 23±2.8 ms) compared with CG, respectively. In addition, mean HR (GEX2: 88.1 ±12.3 bpm; GEX1: 79.4±5.7 bpm, CG: 100.4±10.1 bpm) and mean RR (GEX2: 694.0±101.8 bpm; GEX1: 759.1±57.0 bpm, CG: 602.8±59.1 bpm) were different to exercise groups compared to controls regardless dosage. However, there was no significant difference between the exercise groups (GEX1 and GEX2). Conclusions: Regardless dosage, post-CABG patients who engaged in a mobilization-exercise program demonstrated better cardiac autonomic modulation at discharge compared with the control group. The results are encouraging further investigation in the field of in-hospital exercise rehabilitation dosage on cardiac autonomic modulation in a\",\"PeriodicalId\":164984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy, Critical Care and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy, Critical Care and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4322/2675-9977.cpcr.42060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy, Critical Care and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4322/2675-9977.cpcr.42060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

1;摘要背景:冠状动脉搭桥手术(CABG)意味着心脏自主调节(CAM)的损害。院内动员对CAM有正向影响;然而,对于冠脉搭桥后患者,较高的运动剂量是否能提供与低剂量相同的益处尚不清楚。目的:探讨每日1次或2次住院运动对冠脉搭桥术后心脏自主调节的剂量效应。设计:准实验设计的前瞻性试验。方法:30例确诊为冠心病且首次冠脉搭桥后的男女患者以非随机方式分为GEX1组(n = 10)和GEX2组(n = 10),分别进行1次和2次日常运动加常规护理(呼吸练习、教育,无系统的动员训练计划);对照组(CG, n = 10),由只接受常规护理的患者组成。患者接受活动方案直到出院,其中包括渐进式下肢/上肢主动辅助练习的五个步骤。在基础状态和出院时用心率监测仪记录心率(HR)和r波间隔(RRi)。通过心率变异性(HRV)评估CAM。结果:在出院时,高剂量组(GEX2)副交感神经(RMSSD: 7.9±1.3 ms vs 4.6±0.4 ms)和总体CAM指数(STD RR: 7.5±1.1 ms vs 4.8±0.5 ms)和TINN(38±6.4 ms vs 23±2.8 ms)均显著高于CG。平均心率(GEX2: 88.1±12.3 bpm;GEX1: 79.4±5.7 bpm, CG: 100.4±10.1 bpm)和平均RR (GEX2: 694.0±101.8 bpm;GEX1: 759.1±57.0 bpm, CG: 602.8±59.1 bpm)与对照组相比,无论给药剂量不同。然而,运动组(GEX1和GEX2)之间没有显著差异。结论:无论剂量如何,与对照组相比,cabg后参与活动锻炼计划的患者在出院时表现出更好的心脏自主调节。本研究结果为进一步研究院内运动康复剂量对心脏自主调节的影响提供了理论依据
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In-hospital mobilization after cardiac surgery: investigation of a dose-effect of once- and twice-daily exercise on cardiac autonomic modulation
1  ; Audrey Borghi-Silva 1  Abstract Background: Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) implies in impairment of cardiac autonomic modulation (CAM). In-hospital mobilization positively affects CAM; however, it is not known whether higher exercise dosage would provide the same benefits in CAM as lower dosage in patients post-CABG. Aims: To investigate the dose-effect of an exercise inpatient program performed once or twice-daily on cardiac autonomic modulation post-CABG. Design: Prospective trial with a quasi-experimental design. Methods: Thirty patients of both sexes with a diagnosis of coronary heart disease and first-time post-CABG were allocated in a non-random manner into GEX1 (n = 10) and GEX2 (n = 10), composed of patients engaged in one and two daily exercise sessions plus usual care (breathing exercises, education with no systematized mobilization exercise program), respectively; and control group (CG, n = 10), composed of those who only received usual care. Patients underwent a mobilization protocol until discharge, which included a progressive five steps of active-assistive exercises of lower/upper limbs. Heart rate (HR) and R-wave intervals (RRi) were recorded by heart rate monitor at basal condition and discharge time. CAM was assessed by heart rate variability (HRV). Results: At discharge, the higher-dose group (GEX2) showed significant higher values of: parasympathetic (RMSSD: 7.9±1.3 ms vs 4.6±0.4 ms) and overall CAM indexes (STD RR: 7.5±1.1 ms vs 4.8±0.5 ms and TINN (38±6.4 ms vs 23±2.8 ms) compared with CG, respectively. In addition, mean HR (GEX2: 88.1 ±12.3 bpm; GEX1: 79.4±5.7 bpm, CG: 100.4±10.1 bpm) and mean RR (GEX2: 694.0±101.8 bpm; GEX1: 759.1±57.0 bpm, CG: 602.8±59.1 bpm) were different to exercise groups compared to controls regardless dosage. However, there was no significant difference between the exercise groups (GEX1 and GEX2). Conclusions: Regardless dosage, post-CABG patients who engaged in a mobilization-exercise program demonstrated better cardiac autonomic modulation at discharge compared with the control group. The results are encouraging further investigation in the field of in-hospital exercise rehabilitation dosage on cardiac autonomic modulation in a
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信