利用CNN和Tensorflow对河流表面的塑料垃圾进行分类

J. McShane, Kevin Meehan, Eoghan Furey, M. McAfee
{"title":"利用CNN和Tensorflow对河流表面的塑料垃圾进行分类","authors":"J. McShane, Kevin Meehan, Eoghan Furey, M. McAfee","doi":"10.1109/UEMCON53757.2021.9666556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Waste in rivers is an ever-increasing problem. This paper will look at Deep Learning and Computer Vision technologies to determine if they can be applied to the problem domain. Usage of Deep Learning and Computer Vision technologies has grown massively in the last few years thanks to increased computational power, the availability of training data such as ImageNet, and the availability more complex and efficient algorithms. This research investigates two models to determine which one is more suited for the problem domain by evaluating their results based on performing training and testing on a developed waste dataset for the purposes of this research. The dataset is developed four times, each variant incurring more implementation of pre-processing techniques than the other. This resulted in the same dataset being tested four times on both models with varying levels of pre-processing. The first variant of the dataset had no pre-processing, the second with aspect ratio adjusting, the third dataset being augmented by the image data generator, and the fourth by way of an independent augmentation pipeline. The developed waste dataset has images of size 100x100 dimensions regardless of variant. Variant one of the waste datasets contained 1000 images and expanded all the way up to 19,973 images after pipeline augmentation in variant 4. Both VGG-16 and DenseNet-201 will have all four variants implemented on them to investigate which CNN best suits this research domain but also investigate the differences of applying different pre-processing techniques and how this affects results yielded by the two CNN models.","PeriodicalId":127072,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 12th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classifying Plastic Waste on River Surfaces utilising CNN and Tensorflow\",\"authors\":\"J. McShane, Kevin Meehan, Eoghan Furey, M. McAfee\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/UEMCON53757.2021.9666556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Waste in rivers is an ever-increasing problem. This paper will look at Deep Learning and Computer Vision technologies to determine if they can be applied to the problem domain. Usage of Deep Learning and Computer Vision technologies has grown massively in the last few years thanks to increased computational power, the availability of training data such as ImageNet, and the availability more complex and efficient algorithms. This research investigates two models to determine which one is more suited for the problem domain by evaluating their results based on performing training and testing on a developed waste dataset for the purposes of this research. The dataset is developed four times, each variant incurring more implementation of pre-processing techniques than the other. This resulted in the same dataset being tested four times on both models with varying levels of pre-processing. The first variant of the dataset had no pre-processing, the second with aspect ratio adjusting, the third dataset being augmented by the image data generator, and the fourth by way of an independent augmentation pipeline. The developed waste dataset has images of size 100x100 dimensions regardless of variant. Variant one of the waste datasets contained 1000 images and expanded all the way up to 19,973 images after pipeline augmentation in variant 4. Both VGG-16 and DenseNet-201 will have all four variants implemented on them to investigate which CNN best suits this research domain but also investigate the differences of applying different pre-processing techniques and how this affects results yielded by the two CNN models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE 12th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE 12th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/UEMCON53757.2021.9666556\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 12th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UEMCON53757.2021.9666556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

河流中的废物是一个日益严重的问题。本文将着眼于深度学习和计算机视觉技术,以确定它们是否可以应用于问题领域。深度学习和计算机视觉技术的使用在过去几年中大幅增长,这要归功于计算能力的提高、ImageNet等训练数据的可用性以及更复杂、更高效的算法的可用性。本研究调查了两个模型,以确定哪一个模型更适合问题领域,方法是基于对开发的废物数据集进行训练和测试来评估它们的结果。数据集开发了四次,每个变体都比其他变体需要更多的预处理技术。这导致同一数据集在两种模型上以不同的预处理水平测试了四次。数据集的第一种变体没有进行预处理,第二种具有宽高比调整,第三种数据集由图像数据生成器增强,第四种数据集通过独立的增强管道增强。开发的废物数据集具有大小为100x100的图像,而不考虑变量。变体1中的废弃数据集包含1000张图像,并且在变体4中的管道增强后一直扩展到19,973张图像。VGG-16和DenseNet-201都将在其上实现所有四种变体,以研究哪种CNN最适合该研究领域,同时还研究应用不同预处理技术的差异以及这如何影响两种CNN模型产生的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classifying Plastic Waste on River Surfaces utilising CNN and Tensorflow
Waste in rivers is an ever-increasing problem. This paper will look at Deep Learning and Computer Vision technologies to determine if they can be applied to the problem domain. Usage of Deep Learning and Computer Vision technologies has grown massively in the last few years thanks to increased computational power, the availability of training data such as ImageNet, and the availability more complex and efficient algorithms. This research investigates two models to determine which one is more suited for the problem domain by evaluating their results based on performing training and testing on a developed waste dataset for the purposes of this research. The dataset is developed four times, each variant incurring more implementation of pre-processing techniques than the other. This resulted in the same dataset being tested four times on both models with varying levels of pre-processing. The first variant of the dataset had no pre-processing, the second with aspect ratio adjusting, the third dataset being augmented by the image data generator, and the fourth by way of an independent augmentation pipeline. The developed waste dataset has images of size 100x100 dimensions regardless of variant. Variant one of the waste datasets contained 1000 images and expanded all the way up to 19,973 images after pipeline augmentation in variant 4. Both VGG-16 and DenseNet-201 will have all four variants implemented on them to investigate which CNN best suits this research domain but also investigate the differences of applying different pre-processing techniques and how this affects results yielded by the two CNN models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信