银行与金融科技合作商业模式促进绿色与可持续增长讨论文件

M. Singh
{"title":"银行与金融科技合作商业模式促进绿色与可持续增长讨论文件","authors":"M. Singh","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3670119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The discussion paper aims to solicit response from different stakeholders, including supervisory agencies, for understanding the risks and likely benefits of collaborative business models between banks and FinTech with an added emphasis on bringing coherence in multiple supervisory priorities like promoting FinTech,addressing climate-risks and sustainable development (SDGs).Though business models for collaboration vary in different jurisdictions, few important examples can be taken to identify common elements that can be replicated in other jurisdictions. The risks inherent in such business models especially in the context of immaturity of such business models, incompatible governance framework, moral-hazard and opaque incentive structures, among others, need to be carefully weighed in terms of benefits relating to market efficiency through better product design and wider distribution. Further questions for discussion are presented in the Annex.","PeriodicalId":122208,"journal":{"name":"INSEAD Working Paper Series","volume":"232 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discussion Paper on Collaborative Business Models between Banks and FinTech for Green & Sustainable Growth\",\"authors\":\"M. Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3670119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The discussion paper aims to solicit response from different stakeholders, including supervisory agencies, for understanding the risks and likely benefits of collaborative business models between banks and FinTech with an added emphasis on bringing coherence in multiple supervisory priorities like promoting FinTech,addressing climate-risks and sustainable development (SDGs).Though business models for collaboration vary in different jurisdictions, few important examples can be taken to identify common elements that can be replicated in other jurisdictions. The risks inherent in such business models especially in the context of immaturity of such business models, incompatible governance framework, moral-hazard and opaque incentive structures, among others, need to be carefully weighed in terms of benefits relating to market efficiency through better product design and wider distribution. Further questions for discussion are presented in the Annex.\",\"PeriodicalId\":122208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INSEAD Working Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"232 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INSEAD Working Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3670119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INSEAD Working Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3670119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该讨论文件旨在征求包括监管机构在内的不同利益相关者的回应,以了解银行与金融科技之间合作商业模式的风险和可能带来的好处,并强调在促进金融科技、应对气候风险和可持续发展(sdg)等多个监管重点之间实现一致性。虽然合作的商业模式在不同的司法管辖区有所不同,但很少有重要的例子可以用来确定可以在其他司法管辖区复制的共同要素。这种商业模式所固有的风险,特别是在这种商业模式不成熟、治理框架不相容、道德风险和不透明的激励结构等情况下,需要通过更好的产品设计和更广泛的分销来仔细权衡与市场效率有关的利益。附件中列出了进一步讨论的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discussion Paper on Collaborative Business Models between Banks and FinTech for Green & Sustainable Growth
The discussion paper aims to solicit response from different stakeholders, including supervisory agencies, for understanding the risks and likely benefits of collaborative business models between banks and FinTech with an added emphasis on bringing coherence in multiple supervisory priorities like promoting FinTech,addressing climate-risks and sustainable development (SDGs).Though business models for collaboration vary in different jurisdictions, few important examples can be taken to identify common elements that can be replicated in other jurisdictions. The risks inherent in such business models especially in the context of immaturity of such business models, incompatible governance framework, moral-hazard and opaque incentive structures, among others, need to be carefully weighed in terms of benefits relating to market efficiency through better product design and wider distribution. Further questions for discussion are presented in the Annex.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信