劳斯莱斯的有效技术转让——商业利益的实际评估

J. C. Kelly, S. Wiseall, D. Knott
{"title":"劳斯莱斯的有效技术转让——商业利益的实际评估","authors":"J. C. Kelly, S. Wiseall, D. Knott","doi":"10.1109/IEMC.2002.1038551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Rolls-Royce University Technology Centres (UTCs) that have been created are widely recognised as one of the more effective models of industrial/academic collaboration. In common with most evaluations of research activity, assessments of UTC performance often identify technology transfer as one of the most critical issues in the UTC-RR chain. As a consequence there are many mechanisms by which technology transfer is now encouraged and planned to take place. At the working level these include people transfer in either direction, project categorisation methods to identify appropriate technology transfer mechanisms and the use of simple check-lists as an active project management tool and for comparison across projects. In particular each Design University Technology Partnership project is encouraged to develop and maintain its own portfolio of mechanisms within a project management framework called a Potential Exploitation Plan. This paper is thus concerned with the evaluation of technology transfer from a series of completed research projects, and not with methods of research project selection per se, although the tools and techniques used can be related.","PeriodicalId":355841,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Engineering Management Conference","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective technology transfer in Rolls-Royce - the practical assessment of business benefits\",\"authors\":\"J. C. Kelly, S. Wiseall, D. Knott\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEMC.2002.1038551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Rolls-Royce University Technology Centres (UTCs) that have been created are widely recognised as one of the more effective models of industrial/academic collaboration. In common with most evaluations of research activity, assessments of UTC performance often identify technology transfer as one of the most critical issues in the UTC-RR chain. As a consequence there are many mechanisms by which technology transfer is now encouraged and planned to take place. At the working level these include people transfer in either direction, project categorisation methods to identify appropriate technology transfer mechanisms and the use of simple check-lists as an active project management tool and for comparison across projects. In particular each Design University Technology Partnership project is encouraged to develop and maintain its own portfolio of mechanisms within a project management framework called a Potential Exploitation Plan. This paper is thus concerned with the evaluation of technology transfer from a series of completed research projects, and not with methods of research project selection per se, although the tools and techniques used can be related.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE International Engineering Management Conference\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE International Engineering Management Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.2002.1038551\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Engineering Management Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.2002.1038551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

罗尔斯·罗伊斯大学技术中心(utc)被广泛认为是更有效的工业/学术合作模式之一。与大多数研究活动的评估一样,对联合技术绩效的评估通常将技术转让确定为联合技术-研发链中最关键的问题之一。因此,现在有许多机制鼓励和计划进行技术转让。在工作层面上,这些包括人员在任何方向的转移,项目分类方法,以确定适当的技术转移机制和使用简单的核对表作为一个积极的项目管理工具,并在项目之间进行比较。特别是鼓励每个设计大学技术合作项目在称为潜在开发计划的项目管理框架内开发和维护自己的机制组合。因此,本文关注的是对一系列已完成的研究项目的技术转移的评价,而不是研究项目选择本身的方法,尽管所使用的工具和技术可能是相关的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effective technology transfer in Rolls-Royce - the practical assessment of business benefits
The Rolls-Royce University Technology Centres (UTCs) that have been created are widely recognised as one of the more effective models of industrial/academic collaboration. In common with most evaluations of research activity, assessments of UTC performance often identify technology transfer as one of the most critical issues in the UTC-RR chain. As a consequence there are many mechanisms by which technology transfer is now encouraged and planned to take place. At the working level these include people transfer in either direction, project categorisation methods to identify appropriate technology transfer mechanisms and the use of simple check-lists as an active project management tool and for comparison across projects. In particular each Design University Technology Partnership project is encouraged to develop and maintain its own portfolio of mechanisms within a project management framework called a Potential Exploitation Plan. This paper is thus concerned with the evaluation of technology transfer from a series of completed research projects, and not with methods of research project selection per se, although the tools and techniques used can be related.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信