{"title":"Eiser诉西班牙-史无前例地因法庭构成不当而撤销ICSID裁决","authors":"Saar A Pauker, Ben L. Winston","doi":"10.1163/22119000-12340205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe ad hoc Committee in Eiser Infrastructure Limited and Energía Solar Luxembourg SÀRL v Kingdom of Spain, annulled a unanimous ICSID award in its entirety, inter alia, on the ground that the tribunal was not properly constituted (Article 52(1)(a) of the ICSID Convention). The Committee found a ‘manifest appearance of bias’ with regard the claimant nominated arbitrator because the latter did not disclose his professional relationships with a Claimants’ expert, who testified before the Tribunal. The decision contains doctrinal findings which may reinforce and broaden arbitrators’ duty of disclosure. Nevertheless, the outcome of the decision – where proceedings, which began in 2013, at considerable expense to the parties, were annulled in full – seems unreasonable and inefficient. Moreover, some parts of the Committee‘s reasoning, as well as its decision to annul the award without giving the arbitrator an opportunity to refute the allegations raised against him, are questionable.","PeriodicalId":163787,"journal":{"name":"The journal of world investment and trade","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eiser v Spain – Unprecedented Annulment of an ICSID Award for Improper Constitution of the Tribunal\",\"authors\":\"Saar A Pauker, Ben L. Winston\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22119000-12340205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe ad hoc Committee in Eiser Infrastructure Limited and Energía Solar Luxembourg SÀRL v Kingdom of Spain, annulled a unanimous ICSID award in its entirety, inter alia, on the ground that the tribunal was not properly constituted (Article 52(1)(a) of the ICSID Convention). The Committee found a ‘manifest appearance of bias’ with regard the claimant nominated arbitrator because the latter did not disclose his professional relationships with a Claimants’ expert, who testified before the Tribunal. The decision contains doctrinal findings which may reinforce and broaden arbitrators’ duty of disclosure. Nevertheless, the outcome of the decision – where proceedings, which began in 2013, at considerable expense to the parties, were annulled in full – seems unreasonable and inefficient. Moreover, some parts of the Committee‘s reasoning, as well as its decision to annul the award without giving the arbitrator an opportunity to refute the allegations raised against him, are questionable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":163787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of world investment and trade\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of world investment and trade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of world investment and trade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在Eiser Infrastructure Limited和Energía Solar Luxembourg SÀRL诉西班牙王国案中,特设委员会完全废除了ICSID的一致裁决,除其他外,理由是仲裁庭的构成不合理(ICSID公约第52(1)(a)条)。委员会发现,申诉人提名的仲裁员“明显存在偏见”,因为后者没有披露他与在仲裁庭作证的申诉人专家的专业关系。该决定包含的理论结论可能会加强和扩大仲裁员的披露义务。尽管如此,该决定的结果似乎是不合理和低效的——2013年开始的诉讼程序,各方付出了相当大的代价,被全面撤销。此外,委员会推理的某些部分,以及它在没有给仲裁员机会反驳对他提出的指控的情况下就宣布裁决无效的决定,都是值得怀疑的。
Eiser v Spain – Unprecedented Annulment of an ICSID Award for Improper Constitution of the Tribunal
The ad hoc Committee in Eiser Infrastructure Limited and Energía Solar Luxembourg SÀRL v Kingdom of Spain, annulled a unanimous ICSID award in its entirety, inter alia, on the ground that the tribunal was not properly constituted (Article 52(1)(a) of the ICSID Convention). The Committee found a ‘manifest appearance of bias’ with regard the claimant nominated arbitrator because the latter did not disclose his professional relationships with a Claimants’ expert, who testified before the Tribunal. The decision contains doctrinal findings which may reinforce and broaden arbitrators’ duty of disclosure. Nevertheless, the outcome of the decision – where proceedings, which began in 2013, at considerable expense to the parties, were annulled in full – seems unreasonable and inefficient. Moreover, some parts of the Committee‘s reasoning, as well as its decision to annul the award without giving the arbitrator an opportunity to refute the allegations raised against him, are questionable.