神经肌肉门和匹配

R. Laughlin, Shirlyn A. Adkins, Michael Baer, S. Dehbashi, K. Gable, R. Govindarajan, K. Gwathmey, M. Hehir, M. Imperioli, R. Price, S. Sakamuri, J. Sokol, Noelle Tiongson, Ericka Wong, Z. London
{"title":"神经肌肉门和匹配","authors":"R. Laughlin, Shirlyn A. Adkins, Michael Baer, S. Dehbashi, K. Gable, R. Govindarajan, K. Gwathmey, M. Hehir, M. Imperioli, R. Price, S. Sakamuri, J. Sokol, Noelle Tiongson, Ericka Wong, Z. London","doi":"10.1212/ne9.0000000000200086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior to 2021, the neuromuscular medicine fellowship application process suffered from non-standardized timelines and substantial variability. To rectify this, the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) established a standardized application timeline and an online application portal in 2020-2021, followed by the introduction of a partial match process. In 2021-2022, AANEM launched a traditional, binding, two-way match system for fellowship positions allocation based on the Gale-Shapley stable matching algorithm. Surveys assessing perceptions of fairness in the application portal and match process were dispatched to applicants and program directors following the 2021 and 2022 recruitment cycles. In the 2020-21 cycle, 90% of program directors and 95% of applicants affirmed the standardized timeline benefited applicants. However, 57% of applicants deemed the process as unfair. All programs and most applicants (58%) favored a transition to a two-way match. The implementation of the two-way match in 2021-22 attracted participation from 97% of programs, with 80% of applicants and 95% of programs viewing the process as fair to applicants. A significant majority of both applicants (86%) and programs (94%) supported maintaining the standardized timeline and two-way match. We advocate for the universal adoption of the AANEM Match for neuromuscular fellowship recruitment and a standardized fellowship application timeline across all neurologic specialties to promote transparency, fairness, and equity for applicants.","PeriodicalId":273801,"journal":{"name":"Neurology: Education","volume":"181 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Neuromuscular Portal and Match\",\"authors\":\"R. Laughlin, Shirlyn A. Adkins, Michael Baer, S. Dehbashi, K. Gable, R. Govindarajan, K. Gwathmey, M. Hehir, M. Imperioli, R. Price, S. Sakamuri, J. Sokol, Noelle Tiongson, Ericka Wong, Z. London\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/ne9.0000000000200086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prior to 2021, the neuromuscular medicine fellowship application process suffered from non-standardized timelines and substantial variability. To rectify this, the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) established a standardized application timeline and an online application portal in 2020-2021, followed by the introduction of a partial match process. In 2021-2022, AANEM launched a traditional, binding, two-way match system for fellowship positions allocation based on the Gale-Shapley stable matching algorithm. Surveys assessing perceptions of fairness in the application portal and match process were dispatched to applicants and program directors following the 2021 and 2022 recruitment cycles. In the 2020-21 cycle, 90% of program directors and 95% of applicants affirmed the standardized timeline benefited applicants. However, 57% of applicants deemed the process as unfair. All programs and most applicants (58%) favored a transition to a two-way match. The implementation of the two-way match in 2021-22 attracted participation from 97% of programs, with 80% of applicants and 95% of programs viewing the process as fair to applicants. A significant majority of both applicants (86%) and programs (94%) supported maintaining the standardized timeline and two-way match. We advocate for the universal adoption of the AANEM Match for neuromuscular fellowship recruitment and a standardized fellowship application timeline across all neurologic specialties to promote transparency, fairness, and equity for applicants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology: Education\",\"volume\":\"181 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology: Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/ne9.0000000000200086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology: Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/ne9.0000000000200086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在2021年之前,神经肌肉医学奖学金申请过程受到非标准化时间表和大量变化的影响。为了纠正这一点,美国神经肌肉与电诊断医学协会(AANEM)在2020-2021年建立了标准化的申请时间表和在线申请门户网站,随后引入了部分匹配过程。2021-2022年,AANEM推出了基于Gale-Shapley稳定匹配算法的传统、约束性、双向匹配系统,用于奖学金职位分配。在2021年和2022年的招聘周期之后,对申请人和项目主管进行了评估申请门户网站和匹配过程公平性的调查。在2020-21周期中,90%的项目主管和95%的申请人肯定了标准化时间表使申请人受益。然而,57%的申请者认为这个过程不公平。所有项目和大多数申请者(58%)都倾向于向双向匹配过渡。2021- 2022年实施的双向匹配吸引了97%的项目参与,80%的申请人和95%的项目认为这一过程对申请人是公平的。绝大多数申请人(86%)和项目(94%)都支持保持标准化的时间表和双向匹配。我们提倡在神经肌肉研究人员招募中普遍采用AANEM匹配,并在所有神经专业中采用标准化的研究人员申请时间表,以促进申请人的透明度,公平性和公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Neuromuscular Portal and Match
Prior to 2021, the neuromuscular medicine fellowship application process suffered from non-standardized timelines and substantial variability. To rectify this, the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) established a standardized application timeline and an online application portal in 2020-2021, followed by the introduction of a partial match process. In 2021-2022, AANEM launched a traditional, binding, two-way match system for fellowship positions allocation based on the Gale-Shapley stable matching algorithm. Surveys assessing perceptions of fairness in the application portal and match process were dispatched to applicants and program directors following the 2021 and 2022 recruitment cycles. In the 2020-21 cycle, 90% of program directors and 95% of applicants affirmed the standardized timeline benefited applicants. However, 57% of applicants deemed the process as unfair. All programs and most applicants (58%) favored a transition to a two-way match. The implementation of the two-way match in 2021-22 attracted participation from 97% of programs, with 80% of applicants and 95% of programs viewing the process as fair to applicants. A significant majority of both applicants (86%) and programs (94%) supported maintaining the standardized timeline and two-way match. We advocate for the universal adoption of the AANEM Match for neuromuscular fellowship recruitment and a standardized fellowship application timeline across all neurologic specialties to promote transparency, fairness, and equity for applicants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信