伊朗综合图书馆软件界面词汇分析及用户理解

M. Nowkarizi
{"title":"伊朗综合图书馆软件界面词汇分析及用户理解","authors":"M. Nowkarizi","doi":"10.1109/ICACTE.2008.222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose was to survey vocabulary readability of Simorgh (SIM) and Pars Azerakhsh (PAZ) OPACs in two university libraries of Iran. The population included undergraduate and post graduate (except PhD.) students in Ferdowsi (to examine the SIM OPAC) and Shiraz (to examine the PAZ OPAC) universities. Data gathered by a questionnaire from 380 persons of whom 275 (145 of 200 from Ferdowsi and 130 of 180 from Shiraz Universities) returned the questionnaire. Findings showed understanding rate of interface vocabulary was %35.1 for SIM OPAC and %33.9 for PAZ one. Any significant difference was not observed in readability of interface vocabulary between various degree students. Understanding rate of vocabulary used in SIM OPAC interface did not show any significant difference with the same rate in PAZ OPAC. In SIM OPAC and PAZ, a significant difference was observed between vocabulary readability of first page and other pages (for other pages). The impact of users' experience in SIM and PAZ OPACs on their understanding rate of interface vocabulary did not show any significant difference among correct answers obtained from students of different school years. The impact of study areas (humanities, basic sciences and engineering) on vocabulary readability of SIM and PAZ OPACs was examined and results showed a significant difference between means gained from respondents' scores of the three areas in Ferdowsi University (SIM OPAC). In Shiraz University, that impact was not significant. This study was limited to a certain population in two Iranian universities that cannot be easily considered as an representative of the heterogeneous population of academic environments. In addition, the data collected was based on a researcher made questionnaire rather than a standardized one. Most studies in this area are dealing with user satisfaction and emphasize on how much OPAC interfaces satisfy users. However, this paper addresses an aspect of them that has received little attention up to now. The paper explores users' comprehension of OPAC vocabulary, and the elements that affect it.","PeriodicalId":364568,"journal":{"name":"2008 International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Interface Vocabulary and Users' Understanding in Integrated Iranian Library Software\",\"authors\":\"M. Nowkarizi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICACTE.2008.222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose was to survey vocabulary readability of Simorgh (SIM) and Pars Azerakhsh (PAZ) OPACs in two university libraries of Iran. The population included undergraduate and post graduate (except PhD.) students in Ferdowsi (to examine the SIM OPAC) and Shiraz (to examine the PAZ OPAC) universities. Data gathered by a questionnaire from 380 persons of whom 275 (145 of 200 from Ferdowsi and 130 of 180 from Shiraz Universities) returned the questionnaire. Findings showed understanding rate of interface vocabulary was %35.1 for SIM OPAC and %33.9 for PAZ one. Any significant difference was not observed in readability of interface vocabulary between various degree students. Understanding rate of vocabulary used in SIM OPAC interface did not show any significant difference with the same rate in PAZ OPAC. In SIM OPAC and PAZ, a significant difference was observed between vocabulary readability of first page and other pages (for other pages). The impact of users' experience in SIM and PAZ OPACs on their understanding rate of interface vocabulary did not show any significant difference among correct answers obtained from students of different school years. The impact of study areas (humanities, basic sciences and engineering) on vocabulary readability of SIM and PAZ OPACs was examined and results showed a significant difference between means gained from respondents' scores of the three areas in Ferdowsi University (SIM OPAC). In Shiraz University, that impact was not significant. This study was limited to a certain population in two Iranian universities that cannot be easily considered as an representative of the heterogeneous population of academic environments. In addition, the data collected was based on a researcher made questionnaire rather than a standardized one. Most studies in this area are dealing with user satisfaction and emphasize on how much OPAC interfaces satisfy users. However, this paper addresses an aspect of them that has received little attention up to now. The paper explores users' comprehension of OPAC vocabulary, and the elements that affect it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":364568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"121 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACTE.2008.222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACTE.2008.222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的是调查伊朗两所大学图书馆Simorgh (SIM)和Pars Azerakhsh (PAZ) OPACs的词汇可读性。人口包括本科生和研究生(博士除外)在费尔多西(检查SIM OPAC)和设拉子(检查PAZ OPAC)大学。通过对380人进行问卷调查收集数据,其中275人(费尔多西大学200人中的145人,设拉子大学180人中的130人)返回了问卷。结果表明,SIM OPAC的界面词汇理解率为% 35.1%,PAZ 1的界面词汇理解率为%33.9。不同学历学生界面词汇可读性差异不显著。SIM OPAC界面的词汇理解率与PAZ OPAC界面的词汇理解率无显著差异。在SIM、OPAC和PAZ中,第一页和其他页(其他页)的词汇可读性存在显著差异。用户在SIM和PAZ OPACs中的体验对其界面词汇理解率的影响在不同学年学生的正确答案中没有显着差异。研究了人文、基础科学和工程三个研究领域对SIM和PAZ OPAC词汇可读性的影响,结果显示费尔多西大学(SIM OPAC)三个领域的得分均值存在显著差异。在设拉子大学,这种影响并不显著。这项研究仅限于两所伊朗大学的特定人群,这两所大学不容易被视为学术环境异质性人群的代表。此外,收集的数据是基于研究人员制作的问卷,而不是标准化的问卷。这一领域的研究大多涉及用户满意度,并强调OPAC接口对用户的满意度。然而,本文讨论的是迄今为止人们很少关注的一个方面。本文探讨了用户对OPAC词汇的理解,以及影响OPAC词汇理解的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Interface Vocabulary and Users' Understanding in Integrated Iranian Library Software
The purpose was to survey vocabulary readability of Simorgh (SIM) and Pars Azerakhsh (PAZ) OPACs in two university libraries of Iran. The population included undergraduate and post graduate (except PhD.) students in Ferdowsi (to examine the SIM OPAC) and Shiraz (to examine the PAZ OPAC) universities. Data gathered by a questionnaire from 380 persons of whom 275 (145 of 200 from Ferdowsi and 130 of 180 from Shiraz Universities) returned the questionnaire. Findings showed understanding rate of interface vocabulary was %35.1 for SIM OPAC and %33.9 for PAZ one. Any significant difference was not observed in readability of interface vocabulary between various degree students. Understanding rate of vocabulary used in SIM OPAC interface did not show any significant difference with the same rate in PAZ OPAC. In SIM OPAC and PAZ, a significant difference was observed between vocabulary readability of first page and other pages (for other pages). The impact of users' experience in SIM and PAZ OPACs on their understanding rate of interface vocabulary did not show any significant difference among correct answers obtained from students of different school years. The impact of study areas (humanities, basic sciences and engineering) on vocabulary readability of SIM and PAZ OPACs was examined and results showed a significant difference between means gained from respondents' scores of the three areas in Ferdowsi University (SIM OPAC). In Shiraz University, that impact was not significant. This study was limited to a certain population in two Iranian universities that cannot be easily considered as an representative of the heterogeneous population of academic environments. In addition, the data collected was based on a researcher made questionnaire rather than a standardized one. Most studies in this area are dealing with user satisfaction and emphasize on how much OPAC interfaces satisfy users. However, this paper addresses an aspect of them that has received little attention up to now. The paper explores users' comprehension of OPAC vocabulary, and the elements that affect it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信