银行业的管治与文化

A. Morrison, Joel D. Shapiro
{"title":"银行业的管治与文化","authors":"A. Morrison, Joel D. Shapiro","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2731357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A growing consensus holds that cultural standards are at least as important as formal rules for the effectiveness and soundness of the banking sector. Nevertheless, the banking literature is mostly silent on cultural effects. We present an analysis of banking culture that draws upon prior sociological and economic work on organizational culture. We argue that the most important cultural practices in the financial services sector arose in response to pressing economic and social problems. But, once embedded into market activity, those practices became part of a toolkit that bankers could use in many contexts. In particular, after changes to the technological and legal environment within which bankers operate decoupled cultural practices from their original context, bankers started to deploy cultural devices in new fora where their social utility was less apparent. We examine this argument in the context of the LIBOR and Forex fixings, and we examine a number of policy prescriptions. The recent emphasis upon “tone from the top” is appropriate but, by itself, will be insufficient: culture can only be supervised and influenced by actors who are sufficiently immersed in it to decode the private languages upon which it is built.","PeriodicalId":448402,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance & Sociology or Psychology eJournal","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Governance and Culture in the Banking Sector\",\"authors\":\"A. Morrison, Joel D. Shapiro\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2731357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A growing consensus holds that cultural standards are at least as important as formal rules for the effectiveness and soundness of the banking sector. Nevertheless, the banking literature is mostly silent on cultural effects. We present an analysis of banking culture that draws upon prior sociological and economic work on organizational culture. We argue that the most important cultural practices in the financial services sector arose in response to pressing economic and social problems. But, once embedded into market activity, those practices became part of a toolkit that bankers could use in many contexts. In particular, after changes to the technological and legal environment within which bankers operate decoupled cultural practices from their original context, bankers started to deploy cultural devices in new fora where their social utility was less apparent. We examine this argument in the context of the LIBOR and Forex fixings, and we examine a number of policy prescriptions. The recent emphasis upon “tone from the top” is appropriate but, by itself, will be insufficient: culture can only be supervised and influenced by actors who are sufficiently immersed in it to decode the private languages upon which it is built.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Governance & Sociology or Psychology eJournal\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Governance & Sociology or Psychology eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2731357\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance & Sociology or Psychology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2731357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

越来越多的人认为,对于银行业的有效性和稳健性,文化标准至少与正式规则同等重要。然而,银行业文献大多对文化影响保持沉默。我们提出了银行文化的分析,借鉴了先前的社会学和经济学工作的组织文化。我们认为,金融服务业中最重要的文化实践是对紧迫的经济和社会问题的回应。但是,一旦融入市场活动,这些做法就成为银行家可以在许多情况下使用的工具包的一部分。特别是,在银行家运作的技术和法律环境发生变化后,文化实践与原始环境脱钩,银行家开始在社会效用不那么明显的新论坛中部署文化设备。我们在LIBOR和外汇定价的背景下研究这一论点,并研究一些政策处方。最近对“自上而下的语气”的强调是恰当的,但仅靠它本身是不够的:文化只能由那些充分沉浸在其中、能够破译其赖以建立的私人语言的行动者来监督和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Governance and Culture in the Banking Sector
A growing consensus holds that cultural standards are at least as important as formal rules for the effectiveness and soundness of the banking sector. Nevertheless, the banking literature is mostly silent on cultural effects. We present an analysis of banking culture that draws upon prior sociological and economic work on organizational culture. We argue that the most important cultural practices in the financial services sector arose in response to pressing economic and social problems. But, once embedded into market activity, those practices became part of a toolkit that bankers could use in many contexts. In particular, after changes to the technological and legal environment within which bankers operate decoupled cultural practices from their original context, bankers started to deploy cultural devices in new fora where their social utility was less apparent. We examine this argument in the context of the LIBOR and Forex fixings, and we examine a number of policy prescriptions. The recent emphasis upon “tone from the top” is appropriate but, by itself, will be insufficient: culture can only be supervised and influenced by actors who are sufficiently immersed in it to decode the private languages upon which it is built.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信