维护多访问数据的顺序和一致性

Ronald Tugender
{"title":"维护多访问数据的顺序和一致性","authors":"Ronald Tugender","doi":"10.1109/MARK.1979.8817153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of controlling simultaneous access to shared data runs throughout the history of computer science. In order to preserve the consistency and integrity of such data, computer scientists and programmers have developed locks, 6 semaphores, 3 the notion of critical sections, 4 , 3 monitors, 5 and innumerable other techniques, both concrete and abstract. The great interest in such mechanisms throughout the computer community, both in the literature and in practice, is indicative of the importance of the problem.","PeriodicalId":341008,"journal":{"name":"1979 International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge (MARK)","volume":"12 9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1899-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maintaining order and consistency in multi-access data\",\"authors\":\"Ronald Tugender\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MARK.1979.8817153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem of controlling simultaneous access to shared data runs throughout the history of computer science. In order to preserve the consistency and integrity of such data, computer scientists and programmers have developed locks, 6 semaphores, 3 the notion of critical sections, 4 , 3 monitors, 5 and innumerable other techniques, both concrete and abstract. The great interest in such mechanisms throughout the computer community, both in the literature and in practice, is indicative of the importance of the problem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1979 International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge (MARK)\",\"volume\":\"12 9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1899-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1979 International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge (MARK)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MARK.1979.8817153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1979 International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge (MARK)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MARK.1979.8817153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

控制对共享数据的同时访问的问题贯穿了整个计算机科学的历史。为了保持这些数据的一致性和完整性,计算机科学家和程序员开发了锁、信号量、临界区概念、监视器和无数其他具体和抽象的技术。整个计算机社区对这种机制的极大兴趣,无论是在文献中还是在实践中,都表明了这个问题的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maintaining order and consistency in multi-access data
The problem of controlling simultaneous access to shared data runs throughout the history of computer science. In order to preserve the consistency and integrity of such data, computer scientists and programmers have developed locks, 6 semaphores, 3 the notion of critical sections, 4 , 3 monitors, 5 and innumerable other techniques, both concrete and abstract. The great interest in such mechanisms throughout the computer community, both in the literature and in practice, is indicative of the importance of the problem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信