{"title":"毕达哥拉斯神秘主义/民主智慧","authors":"A. Cordingley","doi":"10.3366/EDINBURGH/9781474440608.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter elucidates the dialectic between Pythagorean-Platonic and Democritean ideas latent in the text. It measures the importance of Beckett’s perception of philosophy gained through his study of Wilhelm Windelband’s A History of Philosophy. Unearthing Beckett’s reaction to the nineteenth-century Kantian’s grand narrative of the progress of reason, this chapter maps out the poetics of appropriation that marks Beckett's quintessentially late modernist aesthetics. In no way can Beckett’s poetics edify the Tradition (à la Pound or Eliot), but neither can it simply deny, subvert, or pastiche it. To ask whether or not Beckett escapes into nihilism, to wonder if he finds a philosophically satisfactory solution to his rejection of a faith in reason, or to look for his synthesis of the Ancient dialectic he entertains is in each case to miss the point. Beckett's use of allusive discourse is demonstrated to be a vector through which he explores the mechanisms of listening and memory, creativity and imagination. This chapter therefore begins this book’s investigation of Beckett’s use of philosophy that defines his aesthetics as a limit point of modernism.","PeriodicalId":245579,"journal":{"name":"Samuel Beckett's How It Is","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pythagorean Mysticism/Democritean Wisdom\",\"authors\":\"A. Cordingley\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/EDINBURGH/9781474440608.003.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter elucidates the dialectic between Pythagorean-Platonic and Democritean ideas latent in the text. It measures the importance of Beckett’s perception of philosophy gained through his study of Wilhelm Windelband’s A History of Philosophy. Unearthing Beckett’s reaction to the nineteenth-century Kantian’s grand narrative of the progress of reason, this chapter maps out the poetics of appropriation that marks Beckett's quintessentially late modernist aesthetics. In no way can Beckett’s poetics edify the Tradition (à la Pound or Eliot), but neither can it simply deny, subvert, or pastiche it. To ask whether or not Beckett escapes into nihilism, to wonder if he finds a philosophically satisfactory solution to his rejection of a faith in reason, or to look for his synthesis of the Ancient dialectic he entertains is in each case to miss the point. Beckett's use of allusive discourse is demonstrated to be a vector through which he explores the mechanisms of listening and memory, creativity and imagination. This chapter therefore begins this book’s investigation of Beckett’s use of philosophy that defines his aesthetics as a limit point of modernism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":245579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Samuel Beckett's How It Is\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Samuel Beckett's How It Is\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/EDINBURGH/9781474440608.003.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Samuel Beckett's How It Is","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/EDINBURGH/9781474440608.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本章阐明了文本中蕴含的毕达哥拉斯-柏拉图主义和民主主义思想之间的辩证法。它衡量了贝克特通过研读温德尔班德(Wilhelm Windelband)的《哲学史》(A History of philosophy)而获得的哲学认知的重要性。本章揭示了贝克特对19世纪康德关于理性进步的宏大叙事的反应,描绘了贝克特典型的晚期现代主义美学的挪用诗学。贝克特的诗学既不能陶冶传统(如庞德或艾略特),也不能简单地否定、颠覆或模仿传统。问贝克特是否逃入虚无主义,想知道他是否找到了一个哲学上令人满意的解决方案来拒绝对理性的信仰,或者寻找他对他所喜欢的古代辩证法的综合,在每种情况下都是错过了重点。贝克特对暗示性话语的使用被证明是他探索倾听和记忆、创造力和想象力机制的一个载体。因此,本章开始了本书对贝克特使用哲学的调查,这将他的美学定义为现代主义的一个极限点。
This chapter elucidates the dialectic between Pythagorean-Platonic and Democritean ideas latent in the text. It measures the importance of Beckett’s perception of philosophy gained through his study of Wilhelm Windelband’s A History of Philosophy. Unearthing Beckett’s reaction to the nineteenth-century Kantian’s grand narrative of the progress of reason, this chapter maps out the poetics of appropriation that marks Beckett's quintessentially late modernist aesthetics. In no way can Beckett’s poetics edify the Tradition (à la Pound or Eliot), but neither can it simply deny, subvert, or pastiche it. To ask whether or not Beckett escapes into nihilism, to wonder if he finds a philosophically satisfactory solution to his rejection of a faith in reason, or to look for his synthesis of the Ancient dialectic he entertains is in each case to miss the point. Beckett's use of allusive discourse is demonstrated to be a vector through which he explores the mechanisms of listening and memory, creativity and imagination. This chapter therefore begins this book’s investigation of Beckett’s use of philosophy that defines his aesthetics as a limit point of modernism.