解离体验量表在非临床样本中的效度证据

E. O. Maraldi, W. Zangari
{"title":"解离体验量表在非临床样本中的效度证据","authors":"E. O. Maraldi, W. Zangari","doi":"10.15689/AP.2016.1501.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Validity evidence of the Dissociative Experiences Scale in a nonclinical sample The aim of this paper is to present the psychometric properties, factor structure and evidence of convergent validity of the Brazilian version of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) in a non-clinical sample. The study included 1,450 respondents (67.9% male), 18 and older (M=29.32; SD=11.27), from several Brazilian states, who joined an online survey about the role of dissociative experiences in religious practices and their relation to sociodemographic and psychopathological variables. The exploratory factor analysis indicated that the best solution would be tri-factorial. The factors were named as absorption, depersonalization/derealization and amnesia. The Brazilian DES denoted satisfactory internal consistency. The DES also correlated positively with expected variables, as measures of somatization and conversion symptoms, and reports of religious experiences. Participants with a score greater than or equal to 30 in the DES presented significantly higher scores in emotional abuse, physical abuse and sexual abuse.","PeriodicalId":177093,"journal":{"name":"Avaliaçao Psicologica: Interamerican Journal of Psychological Assessment","volume":"175 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidências de validade da Escala de Experiências Dissociativas em amostra não clínica\",\"authors\":\"E. O. Maraldi, W. Zangari\",\"doi\":\"10.15689/AP.2016.1501.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Validity evidence of the Dissociative Experiences Scale in a nonclinical sample The aim of this paper is to present the psychometric properties, factor structure and evidence of convergent validity of the Brazilian version of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) in a non-clinical sample. The study included 1,450 respondents (67.9% male), 18 and older (M=29.32; SD=11.27), from several Brazilian states, who joined an online survey about the role of dissociative experiences in religious practices and their relation to sociodemographic and psychopathological variables. The exploratory factor analysis indicated that the best solution would be tri-factorial. The factors were named as absorption, depersonalization/derealization and amnesia. The Brazilian DES denoted satisfactory internal consistency. The DES also correlated positively with expected variables, as measures of somatization and conversion symptoms, and reports of religious experiences. Participants with a score greater than or equal to 30 in the DES presented significantly higher scores in emotional abuse, physical abuse and sexual abuse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avaliaçao Psicologica: Interamerican Journal of Psychological Assessment\",\"volume\":\"175 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avaliaçao Psicologica: Interamerican Journal of Psychological Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15689/AP.2016.1501.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avaliaçao Psicologica: Interamerican Journal of Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15689/AP.2016.1501.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要本文旨在探讨巴西版解离经验量表(DES)在非临床样本中的心理测量学特征、因子结构和趋同效度证据。该研究包括1450名18岁及以上的受访者(67.9%为男性)(M=29.32;SD=11.27),他参加了一项关于分离体验在宗教活动中的作用及其与社会人口统计学和精神病理学变量的关系的在线调查。探索性因子分析表明,最佳解决方案是三因子。这些因素被命名为吸收、人格解体/现实感丧失和健忘症。巴西的DES表示令人满意的内部一致性。DES还与预期变量呈正相关,如躯体化和转化症状的测量,以及宗教经历的报告。DES得分大于等于30分的参与者在精神虐待、身体虐待和性虐待方面的得分显著高于其他参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidências de validade da Escala de Experiências Dissociativas em amostra não clínica
Validity evidence of the Dissociative Experiences Scale in a nonclinical sample The aim of this paper is to present the psychometric properties, factor structure and evidence of convergent validity of the Brazilian version of the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) in a non-clinical sample. The study included 1,450 respondents (67.9% male), 18 and older (M=29.32; SD=11.27), from several Brazilian states, who joined an online survey about the role of dissociative experiences in religious practices and their relation to sociodemographic and psychopathological variables. The exploratory factor analysis indicated that the best solution would be tri-factorial. The factors were named as absorption, depersonalization/derealization and amnesia. The Brazilian DES denoted satisfactory internal consistency. The DES also correlated positively with expected variables, as measures of somatization and conversion symptoms, and reports of religious experiences. Participants with a score greater than or equal to 30 in the DES presented significantly higher scores in emotional abuse, physical abuse and sexual abuse.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信