射频电磁暴露:问题,辩论和现实

A. D. Usman, W. F. Wan Ahmad
{"title":"射频电磁暴露:问题,辩论和现实","authors":"A. D. Usman, W. F. Wan Ahmad","doi":"10.1109/RFM.2008.4897381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rapid development in the field of telecommunication industries and the lagging phase to which the exposure assessment results, calls for immediate intervention by scientist and engineers. In order to respond to public outcry, who are daily exposed to various sort of electromagnetic field radiations, a critical look on the electromagnetic field exposure guidelines and assessment of its effectiveness revealed that the guidelines are conservatives and are based only on short-term immediate health effects. In order to accommodate for the unforeseen, a lower limit of 1 w/kg instead of 4 w/kg of the SAR is recommended with a safety margin of 100 for occupational and 10 for the general public. Possible solutions to the gap identified were also provided.","PeriodicalId":329128,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE International RF and Microwave Conference","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RF EM exposure: The issues, the debate and the realities\",\"authors\":\"A. D. Usman, W. F. Wan Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RFM.2008.4897381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rapid development in the field of telecommunication industries and the lagging phase to which the exposure assessment results, calls for immediate intervention by scientist and engineers. In order to respond to public outcry, who are daily exposed to various sort of electromagnetic field radiations, a critical look on the electromagnetic field exposure guidelines and assessment of its effectiveness revealed that the guidelines are conservatives and are based only on short-term immediate health effects. In order to accommodate for the unforeseen, a lower limit of 1 w/kg instead of 4 w/kg of the SAR is recommended with a safety margin of 100 for occupational and 10 for the general public. Possible solutions to the gap identified were also provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":329128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 IEEE International RF and Microwave Conference\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 IEEE International RF and Microwave Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RFM.2008.4897381\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE International RF and Microwave Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RFM.2008.4897381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

电信工业领域的快速发展和暴露评估结果的滞后阶段,要求科学家和工程师立即干预。公众每天都暴露在各种各样的电磁场辐射中,为了回应公众的强烈抗议,对电磁场暴露指南的批判性审视和对其有效性的评估表明,该指南过于保守,仅基于对健康的短期直接影响。为了适应不可预见的情况,建议将SAR的下限改为1w /kg,而不是4w /kg,职业安全边际为100,一般公众安全边际为10。还就所查明的差距提出了可能的解决办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RF EM exposure: The issues, the debate and the realities
Rapid development in the field of telecommunication industries and the lagging phase to which the exposure assessment results, calls for immediate intervention by scientist and engineers. In order to respond to public outcry, who are daily exposed to various sort of electromagnetic field radiations, a critical look on the electromagnetic field exposure guidelines and assessment of its effectiveness revealed that the guidelines are conservatives and are based only on short-term immediate health effects. In order to accommodate for the unforeseen, a lower limit of 1 w/kg instead of 4 w/kg of the SAR is recommended with a safety margin of 100 for occupational and 10 for the general public. Possible solutions to the gap identified were also provided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信