重建第119条第32条“公用事业环境保护与管理”

Victor Apriano R. Lazarus, Fransiskus Saverius Nurdin
{"title":"重建第119条第32条“公用事业环境保护与管理”","authors":"Victor Apriano R. Lazarus, Fransiskus Saverius Nurdin","doi":"10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss2.art10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article 119 section b of Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management stipulates that \"Corporations or business entities may be subject to additional criminal or disciplinary measures in the form of shutting down their places of business and/or activities entirely or partially. The logical consequence of this article is that corporations or business entities will have their operations suspended when they carry out a factumm delictum. This juridical action did not solve the problem, but instead it created the new ones. To answer this fundamental problem, this study intends to teleologically discuss the philosophy of utilitarianism and its weaknesses of the a quo article so that it is deemed necessary for its reconstruction based on the utilitarianism. This is a normative legal research with a philosophical approach. This research concludes that the true law must be fair and bring maximum social happiness to the society without exception. The implication is that the formulation of the Article a quo is reconstructed into \"Corporations or business entities may be subject to additional punishment or disciplinary action in the form of temporary or partial closure of their place of business and/or activities\".","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rekonstruksi Pasal 119 Huruf b Undang-Undang No. 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Berbasis Utilitarianisme\",\"authors\":\"Victor Apriano R. Lazarus, Fransiskus Saverius Nurdin\",\"doi\":\"10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss2.art10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Article 119 section b of Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management stipulates that \\\"Corporations or business entities may be subject to additional criminal or disciplinary measures in the form of shutting down their places of business and/or activities entirely or partially. The logical consequence of this article is that corporations or business entities will have their operations suspended when they carry out a factumm delictum. This juridical action did not solve the problem, but instead it created the new ones. To answer this fundamental problem, this study intends to teleologically discuss the philosophy of utilitarianism and its weaknesses of the a quo article so that it is deemed necessary for its reconstruction based on the utilitarianism. This is a normative legal research with a philosophical approach. This research concludes that the true law must be fair and bring maximum social happiness to the society without exception. The implication is that the formulation of the Article a quo is reconstructed into \\\"Corporations or business entities may be subject to additional punishment or disciplinary action in the form of temporary or partial closure of their place of business and/or activities\\\".\",\"PeriodicalId\":239318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss2.art10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss2.art10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2009年关于环境保护和管理的第32号法律第119条b款规定,“公司或商业实体可能受到额外的刑事或纪律措施,其形式是全部或部分关闭其营业场所和/或活动。这条的逻辑结果是,公司或商业实体在实施违法行为时将暂停其业务。这一法律行动并没有解决问题,反而制造了新的问题。为了回答这一根本问题,本研究试图从目的论的角度探讨《现状》文章的功利主义哲学及其弱点,从而认为有必要在功利主义的基础上进行重构。这是一项具有哲学意义的规范性法律研究。本文的研究结论是,真正的法律必须是公平的,并无一例外地为社会带来最大的社会幸福。其含义是,第a条的措词改为“公司或商业实体可受到额外的惩罚或纪律行动,其形式是暂时或部分关闭其营业和(或)活动地点”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rekonstruksi Pasal 119 Huruf b Undang-Undang No. 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Berbasis Utilitarianisme
Article 119 section b of Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management stipulates that "Corporations or business entities may be subject to additional criminal or disciplinary measures in the form of shutting down their places of business and/or activities entirely or partially. The logical consequence of this article is that corporations or business entities will have their operations suspended when they carry out a factumm delictum. This juridical action did not solve the problem, but instead it created the new ones. To answer this fundamental problem, this study intends to teleologically discuss the philosophy of utilitarianism and its weaknesses of the a quo article so that it is deemed necessary for its reconstruction based on the utilitarianism. This is a normative legal research with a philosophical approach. This research concludes that the true law must be fair and bring maximum social happiness to the society without exception. The implication is that the formulation of the Article a quo is reconstructed into "Corporations or business entities may be subject to additional punishment or disciplinary action in the form of temporary or partial closure of their place of business and/or activities".
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信