改进教师课堂评估方法

Hannah Kitchen, G. Bethell, Elizabeth Fordham, Kirsteen Henderson, Richard Ruochen Li
{"title":"改进教师课堂评估方法","authors":"Hannah Kitchen, G. Bethell, Elizabeth Fordham, Kirsteen Henderson, Richard Ruochen Li","doi":"10.1787/1807effc-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides recommendations for improving the use of classroom assessment in Turkey so that it contributes more effectively to supporting student learning. At present, while teachers in Turkey regularly undertake assessments in the classroom, these tend to be dominated by short‑answer, closed‑question formats, like multiple‑choice questions. This limits the range of students’ knowledge and skills that teachers can assess. The focus on summative assessments that result in a numeric mark also limits space for formative assessment, one of the most important types of assessment for learning. This chapter provides suggestions on how teachers can be encouraged to use a broader range of assessment formats and integrate more formative assessment practices into their regular classroom teaching.","PeriodicalId":198401,"journal":{"name":"OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Student Assessment in Turkey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving teachers’ classroom assessment practices\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Kitchen, G. Bethell, Elizabeth Fordham, Kirsteen Henderson, Richard Ruochen Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1787/1807effc-en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter provides recommendations for improving the use of classroom assessment in Turkey so that it contributes more effectively to supporting student learning. At present, while teachers in Turkey regularly undertake assessments in the classroom, these tend to be dominated by short‑answer, closed‑question formats, like multiple‑choice questions. This limits the range of students’ knowledge and skills that teachers can assess. The focus on summative assessments that result in a numeric mark also limits space for formative assessment, one of the most important types of assessment for learning. This chapter provides suggestions on how teachers can be encouraged to use a broader range of assessment formats and integrate more formative assessment practices into their regular classroom teaching.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Student Assessment in Turkey\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Student Assessment in Turkey\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1787/1807effc-en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Student Assessment in Turkey","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/1807effc-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章为改善土耳其课堂评估的使用提供了建议,使其更有效地支持学生的学习。目前,虽然土耳其教师定期在课堂上进行评估,但这些评估往往以简答、封闭问题形式为主,如多项选择题。这限制了教师能够评估学生知识和技能的范围。对总结性评估的关注导致了一个数字标记,也限制了形成性评估的空间,形成性评估是学习中最重要的评估类型之一。本章就如何鼓励教师使用更广泛的评估格式和将更具形成性的评估实践纳入其常规课堂教学提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving teachers’ classroom assessment practices
This chapter provides recommendations for improving the use of classroom assessment in Turkey so that it contributes more effectively to supporting student learning. At present, while teachers in Turkey regularly undertake assessments in the classroom, these tend to be dominated by short‑answer, closed‑question formats, like multiple‑choice questions. This limits the range of students’ knowledge and skills that teachers can assess. The focus on summative assessments that result in a numeric mark also limits space for formative assessment, one of the most important types of assessment for learning. This chapter provides suggestions on how teachers can be encouraged to use a broader range of assessment formats and integrate more formative assessment practices into their regular classroom teaching.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信