损失和失去机会的证明

A. Burrows
{"title":"损失和失去机会的证明","authors":"A. Burrows","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A word is merited about the terminology of damages for loss of a chance. While it may be possible to distinguish conceptually between damages for loss of a chance and damages for the chance of a loss, this chapter draws no such distinction. Rather it uses the terminology of loss of a chance in a wide sense which covers both the lost chance of acquiring a benefit and the lost chance of avoiding a detriment. Increasing the chance of a loss equates to the lost chance of avoiding a detriment and this explains why a case like Barker v Corus (UK) Plc—where, as we have seen in the previous chapter, the courts awarded damages proportionately to the ‘material increase in risk’ of a disease—is equally well viewed as a loss of a chance case.","PeriodicalId":273138,"journal":{"name":"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proof of loss and loss of a chance\",\"authors\":\"A. Burrows\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A word is merited about the terminology of damages for loss of a chance. While it may be possible to distinguish conceptually between damages for loss of a chance and damages for the chance of a loss, this chapter draws no such distinction. Rather it uses the terminology of loss of a chance in a wide sense which covers both the lost chance of acquiring a benefit and the lost chance of avoiding a detriment. Increasing the chance of a loss equates to the lost chance of avoiding a detriment and this explains why a case like Barker v Corus (UK) Plc—where, as we have seen in the previous chapter, the courts awarded damages proportionately to the ‘material increase in risk’ of a disease—is equally well viewed as a loss of a chance case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remedies for Torts, Breach of Contract, and Equitable Wrongs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198705932.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于机会丧失损害赔偿这一术语,有必要提一下。虽然在概念上有可能区分机会损失损害赔偿和机会损失损害赔偿,但本章没有作出这种区分。相反,它使用了广义上的“失去机会”一词,既包括失去获得利益的机会,也包括失去避免损害的机会。增加损失的机会等于失去了避免损害的机会,这就解释了为什么像Barker v Corus (UK) plc这样的案件——正如我们在上一章看到的,法院根据疾病“风险的实质性增加”按比例判给损害赔偿——同样被视为一个机会案件的损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proof of loss and loss of a chance
A word is merited about the terminology of damages for loss of a chance. While it may be possible to distinguish conceptually between damages for loss of a chance and damages for the chance of a loss, this chapter draws no such distinction. Rather it uses the terminology of loss of a chance in a wide sense which covers both the lost chance of acquiring a benefit and the lost chance of avoiding a detriment. Increasing the chance of a loss equates to the lost chance of avoiding a detriment and this explains why a case like Barker v Corus (UK) Plc—where, as we have seen in the previous chapter, the courts awarded damages proportionately to the ‘material increase in risk’ of a disease—is equally well viewed as a loss of a chance case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信