为专有软件项目推荐代码审阅者:一项大规模的研究

Dezhen Kong, Qiuyuan Chen, Lingfeng Bao, Chenxing Sun, Xin Xia, Shanping Li
{"title":"为专有软件项目推荐代码审阅者:一项大规模的研究","authors":"Dezhen Kong, Qiuyuan Chen, Lingfeng Bao, Chenxing Sun, Xin Xia, Shanping Li","doi":"10.1109/saner53432.2022.00080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Code review is an important activity in software development, which offers benefits such as improving code quality, reducing defects and distributing knowledge. Tencent, as a giant company, hosts a great number of proprietary software projects that are only open to specific internal developers. Since these proprietary projects receive up to 100,000 of newly submitted code changes per month, it is extremely needed to automatically recommend code reviewers. To this end, we first conduct an empirical study on a large scale of proprietary projects from Tencent, to understand their characteristics and how code reviewer recommendation approaches work on them. Based on the derived findings and implications, we propose a new approach named Camp that recommends reviewers by considering their collaboration and expertise in multiple projects, to fit the context of proprietary software development. The evaluation results show that Camp can achieve higher scores on proprietary projects across most metrics than other state-of-the-art approaches, i.e., Revfinder, CHREV, Tie and Comment Network and produce acceptable performance scores for more projects. In addition, we discuss the possible directions of code reviewer recommendation.","PeriodicalId":437520,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recommending Code Reviewers for Proprietary Software Projects: A Large Scale Study\",\"authors\":\"Dezhen Kong, Qiuyuan Chen, Lingfeng Bao, Chenxing Sun, Xin Xia, Shanping Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/saner53432.2022.00080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Code review is an important activity in software development, which offers benefits such as improving code quality, reducing defects and distributing knowledge. Tencent, as a giant company, hosts a great number of proprietary software projects that are only open to specific internal developers. Since these proprietary projects receive up to 100,000 of newly submitted code changes per month, it is extremely needed to automatically recommend code reviewers. To this end, we first conduct an empirical study on a large scale of proprietary projects from Tencent, to understand their characteristics and how code reviewer recommendation approaches work on them. Based on the derived findings and implications, we propose a new approach named Camp that recommends reviewers by considering their collaboration and expertise in multiple projects, to fit the context of proprietary software development. The evaluation results show that Camp can achieve higher scores on proprietary projects across most metrics than other state-of-the-art approaches, i.e., Revfinder, CHREV, Tie and Comment Network and produce acceptable performance scores for more projects. In addition, we discuss the possible directions of code reviewer recommendation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/saner53432.2022.00080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/saner53432.2022.00080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

代码审查是软件开发中的一项重要活动,它提供了诸如提高代码质量、减少缺陷和分发知识等好处。腾讯作为一个大公司,拥有大量的专有软件项目,这些项目只对特定的内部开发者开放。由于这些专有项目每个月接收多达100,000个新提交的代码更改,因此非常需要自动推荐代码审查器。为此,我们首先对腾讯的大规模专有项目进行了实证研究,以了解它们的特点以及代码审查者推荐方法如何在它们身上起作用。基于衍生的发现和含义,我们提出了一种名为Camp的新方法,该方法通过考虑评审人员在多个项目中的协作和专业知识来推荐评审人员,以适应专有软件开发的环境。评估结果表明,Camp可以在大多数指标上比其他最先进的方法(即Revfinder、CHREV、Tie和Comment Network)在专有项目上获得更高的分数,并为更多项目产生可接受的性能分数。此外,我们还讨论了代码评审推荐的可能方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recommending Code Reviewers for Proprietary Software Projects: A Large Scale Study
Code review is an important activity in software development, which offers benefits such as improving code quality, reducing defects and distributing knowledge. Tencent, as a giant company, hosts a great number of proprietary software projects that are only open to specific internal developers. Since these proprietary projects receive up to 100,000 of newly submitted code changes per month, it is extremely needed to automatically recommend code reviewers. To this end, we first conduct an empirical study on a large scale of proprietary projects from Tencent, to understand their characteristics and how code reviewer recommendation approaches work on them. Based on the derived findings and implications, we propose a new approach named Camp that recommends reviewers by considering their collaboration and expertise in multiple projects, to fit the context of proprietary software development. The evaluation results show that Camp can achieve higher scores on proprietary projects across most metrics than other state-of-the-art approaches, i.e., Revfinder, CHREV, Tie and Comment Network and produce acceptable performance scores for more projects. In addition, we discuss the possible directions of code reviewer recommendation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信