中欧和东欧的技术升级和增长

S. Radosevic, D. Yoruk, E. Yoruk
{"title":"中欧和东欧的技术升级和增长","authors":"S. Radosevic, D. Yoruk, E. Yoruk","doi":"10.4324/9780429450969-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The R&D and technology issues of relevance for catching up cannot be understood or conceptualised only within the R&D based growth model. With this motivation in mind, we have created a composite indicator of innovation capacity and performance of the CEECs, as well as of the EU25, which is meaningful from the perspective of countries lagging behind the world technology frontier. Three conclusions stem from the Index of Technology Upgrading components which have major relevance for policy making. Firstly, we observe a decline in most of the EU25 economies of their production capabilities despite, on average, significant improvements in R&D and technology capability. This suggests that the EU has serious weaknesses in converting its R&D and technological knowledge into production capabilities. Secondly, the Index of Technology Upgrading components show improvements in infrastructure and structural changes in most of the EU economies, but an overall relative decline in firm capabilities. This shows the limitations of current EU supply oriented RDI policies which continue to reinforce the so-called European paradox. Thirdly, increased knowledge interaction between 2006 and 2015 has been confined to the German-led Central European manufacturing cluster. It seems that the EU RDI policy operates as a substitute for technology and knowledge exchange rather than as a complement to it.","PeriodicalId":184486,"journal":{"name":"Social and Economic Development in Central and Eastern Europe","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technology upgrading and growth in Central and Eastern Europe\",\"authors\":\"S. Radosevic, D. Yoruk, E. Yoruk\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780429450969-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The R&D and technology issues of relevance for catching up cannot be understood or conceptualised only within the R&D based growth model. With this motivation in mind, we have created a composite indicator of innovation capacity and performance of the CEECs, as well as of the EU25, which is meaningful from the perspective of countries lagging behind the world technology frontier. Three conclusions stem from the Index of Technology Upgrading components which have major relevance for policy making. Firstly, we observe a decline in most of the EU25 economies of their production capabilities despite, on average, significant improvements in R&D and technology capability. This suggests that the EU has serious weaknesses in converting its R&D and technological knowledge into production capabilities. Secondly, the Index of Technology Upgrading components show improvements in infrastructure and structural changes in most of the EU economies, but an overall relative decline in firm capabilities. This shows the limitations of current EU supply oriented RDI policies which continue to reinforce the so-called European paradox. Thirdly, increased knowledge interaction between 2006 and 2015 has been confined to the German-led Central European manufacturing cluster. It seems that the EU RDI policy operates as a substitute for technology and knowledge exchange rather than as a complement to it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social and Economic Development in Central and Eastern Europe\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social and Economic Development in Central and Eastern Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429450969-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social and Economic Development in Central and Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429450969-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

与追赶相关的研发和技术问题不能仅仅在基于研发的增长模型中被理解或概念化。基于这一动机,我们创建了中东欧国家和欧盟25国创新能力和绩效综合指标,从世界科技落后国家的角度来看,这一指标具有重要意义。从技术升级指数得出的三个结论与政策制定有重大关联。首先,我们观察到大多数欧盟25经济体的生产能力下降,尽管平均而言,研发和技术能力显著提高。这表明欧盟在将其研发和技术知识转化为生产能力方面存在严重的弱点。其次,技术升级指数显示,大多数欧盟经济体的基础设施和结构变化有所改善,但企业能力总体上相对下降。这显示了当前欧盟以供给为导向的RDI政策的局限性,这些政策继续强化了所谓的欧洲悖论。第三,2006年至2015年间,知识互动的增加仅限于德国主导的中欧制造业集群。欧盟的RDI政策似乎是作为技术和知识交流的替代而不是补充来运作的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technology upgrading and growth in Central and Eastern Europe
The R&D and technology issues of relevance for catching up cannot be understood or conceptualised only within the R&D based growth model. With this motivation in mind, we have created a composite indicator of innovation capacity and performance of the CEECs, as well as of the EU25, which is meaningful from the perspective of countries lagging behind the world technology frontier. Three conclusions stem from the Index of Technology Upgrading components which have major relevance for policy making. Firstly, we observe a decline in most of the EU25 economies of their production capabilities despite, on average, significant improvements in R&D and technology capability. This suggests that the EU has serious weaknesses in converting its R&D and technological knowledge into production capabilities. Secondly, the Index of Technology Upgrading components show improvements in infrastructure and structural changes in most of the EU economies, but an overall relative decline in firm capabilities. This shows the limitations of current EU supply oriented RDI policies which continue to reinforce the so-called European paradox. Thirdly, increased knowledge interaction between 2006 and 2015 has been confined to the German-led Central European manufacturing cluster. It seems that the EU RDI policy operates as a substitute for technology and knowledge exchange rather than as a complement to it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信