移动环境下员工的网络安全行为:自我效能感和心理所有权的作用

S. Verkijika
{"title":"移动环境下员工的网络安全行为:自我效能感和心理所有权的作用","authors":"S. Verkijika","doi":"10.1109/IMITEC50163.2020.9334097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mobile devices are widely known to be a cybersecurity risk for organisations. However, their use for work purposes is largely becoming a common practice as most organisations rather prefer to find security countermeasures than miss out on the momentous benefits they provide. Since the weakest link in cybersecurity is the human element, organisations are increasingly looking for ways to upskill their employees so that they can be able to implement the necessary security safeguards. Yet, a concerning trend is that even individuals with a high-security self-efficacy sometimes fail to take the needed security actions. To better understand why this occurs, the present study proposes and validates psychological ownership as a possible boundary condition for explaining the security self-efficacy to security behaviour nexus in the mobile security context. Using an online survey with 214 respondents, this study showed that both the direct and indirect effects of security self-efficacy on mobile device security behaviour were moderated by psychological ownership such that the effects were more pronounced when psychological ownership was high than when it was low. The paper culminates with a discussion of the implications for theory and practice.","PeriodicalId":349926,"journal":{"name":"2020 2nd International Multidisciplinary Information Technology and Engineering Conference (IMITEC)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Employees' Cybersecurity Behaviour in the Mobile Context: The Role of Self-Efficacy and Psychological Ownership\",\"authors\":\"S. Verkijika\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IMITEC50163.2020.9334097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mobile devices are widely known to be a cybersecurity risk for organisations. However, their use for work purposes is largely becoming a common practice as most organisations rather prefer to find security countermeasures than miss out on the momentous benefits they provide. Since the weakest link in cybersecurity is the human element, organisations are increasingly looking for ways to upskill their employees so that they can be able to implement the necessary security safeguards. Yet, a concerning trend is that even individuals with a high-security self-efficacy sometimes fail to take the needed security actions. To better understand why this occurs, the present study proposes and validates psychological ownership as a possible boundary condition for explaining the security self-efficacy to security behaviour nexus in the mobile security context. Using an online survey with 214 respondents, this study showed that both the direct and indirect effects of security self-efficacy on mobile device security behaviour were moderated by psychological ownership such that the effects were more pronounced when psychological ownership was high than when it was low. The paper culminates with a discussion of the implications for theory and practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":349926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 2nd International Multidisciplinary Information Technology and Engineering Conference (IMITEC)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 2nd International Multidisciplinary Information Technology and Engineering Conference (IMITEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMITEC50163.2020.9334097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 2nd International Multidisciplinary Information Technology and Engineering Conference (IMITEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMITEC50163.2020.9334097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

众所周知,移动设备会给企业带来网络安全风险。然而,将它们用于工作目的在很大程度上已成为一种普遍做法,因为大多数组织宁愿找到安全对策,也不愿错过它们提供的重大好处。由于网络安全中最薄弱的环节是人为因素,组织越来越多地寻找提高员工技能的方法,以便他们能够实施必要的安全保障措施。然而,一个令人担忧的趋势是,即使是具有高度安全自我效能感的个体,有时也无法采取必要的安全行动。为了更好地理解为什么会发生这种情况,本研究提出并验证了心理所有权作为解释移动安全背景下安全自我效能与安全行为关系的可能边界条件。通过对214名受访者的在线调查,本研究表明,安全自我效能对移动设备安全行为的直接和间接影响都受到心理所有权的调节,心理所有权高时的影响比心理所有权低时更为明显。论文最后讨论了理论和实践的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Employees' Cybersecurity Behaviour in the Mobile Context: The Role of Self-Efficacy and Psychological Ownership
Mobile devices are widely known to be a cybersecurity risk for organisations. However, their use for work purposes is largely becoming a common practice as most organisations rather prefer to find security countermeasures than miss out on the momentous benefits they provide. Since the weakest link in cybersecurity is the human element, organisations are increasingly looking for ways to upskill their employees so that they can be able to implement the necessary security safeguards. Yet, a concerning trend is that even individuals with a high-security self-efficacy sometimes fail to take the needed security actions. To better understand why this occurs, the present study proposes and validates psychological ownership as a possible boundary condition for explaining the security self-efficacy to security behaviour nexus in the mobile security context. Using an online survey with 214 respondents, this study showed that both the direct and indirect effects of security self-efficacy on mobile device security behaviour were moderated by psychological ownership such that the effects were more pronounced when psychological ownership was high than when it was low. The paper culminates with a discussion of the implications for theory and practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信