紧急医疗服务和急诊科之间的机器学习记录联动算法的推导和验证

C. Redfield, A. Tlimat, Yoni Halpern, David W. Schoenfeld, Edward Ullman, D. Sontag, L. Nathanson, S. Horng
{"title":"紧急医疗服务和急诊科之间的机器学习记录联动算法的推导和验证","authors":"C. Redfield, A. Tlimat, Yoni Halpern, David W. Schoenfeld, Edward Ullman, D. Sontag, L. Nathanson, S. Horng","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocz176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nLinking emergency medical services (EMS) electronic patient care reports (ePCRs) to emergency department (ED) records can provide clinicians access to vital information that can alter management. It can also create rich databases for research and quality improvement. Unfortunately, previous attempts at ePCR and ED record linkage have had limited success. In this study, we use supervised machine learning to derive and validate an automated record linkage algorithm between EMS ePCRs and ED records.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nAll consecutive ePCRs from a single EMS provider between June 2013 and June 2015 were included. A primary reviewer matched ePCRs to a list of ED patients to create a gold standard. Age, gender, last name, first name, social security number, and date of birth were extracted. Data were randomly split into 80% training and 20% test datasets. We derived missing indicators, identical indicators, edit distances, and percent differences. A multivariate logistic regression model was trained using 5-fold cross-validation, using label k-fold, L2 regularization, and class reweighting.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 14 032 ePCRs were included in the study. Interrater reliability between the primary and secondary reviewer had a kappa of 0.9. The algorithm had a sensitivity of 99.4%, a positive predictive value of 99.9%, and an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.99 in both the training and test datasets. Date-of-birth match had the highest odds ratio of 16.9, followed by last name match (10.6). Social security number match had an odds ratio of 3.8.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nWe were able to successfully derive and validate a record linkage algorithm from a single EMS ePCR provider to our hospital EMR.","PeriodicalId":236137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Derivation and validation of a machine learning record linkage algorithm between emergency medical services and the emergency department\",\"authors\":\"C. Redfield, A. Tlimat, Yoni Halpern, David W. Schoenfeld, Edward Ullman, D. Sontag, L. Nathanson, S. Horng\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamia/ocz176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\nLinking emergency medical services (EMS) electronic patient care reports (ePCRs) to emergency department (ED) records can provide clinicians access to vital information that can alter management. It can also create rich databases for research and quality improvement. Unfortunately, previous attempts at ePCR and ED record linkage have had limited success. In this study, we use supervised machine learning to derive and validate an automated record linkage algorithm between EMS ePCRs and ED records.\\n\\n\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\nAll consecutive ePCRs from a single EMS provider between June 2013 and June 2015 were included. A primary reviewer matched ePCRs to a list of ED patients to create a gold standard. Age, gender, last name, first name, social security number, and date of birth were extracted. Data were randomly split into 80% training and 20% test datasets. We derived missing indicators, identical indicators, edit distances, and percent differences. A multivariate logistic regression model was trained using 5-fold cross-validation, using label k-fold, L2 regularization, and class reweighting.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nA total of 14 032 ePCRs were included in the study. Interrater reliability between the primary and secondary reviewer had a kappa of 0.9. The algorithm had a sensitivity of 99.4%, a positive predictive value of 99.9%, and an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.99 in both the training and test datasets. Date-of-birth match had the highest odds ratio of 16.9, followed by last name match (10.6). Social security number match had an odds ratio of 3.8.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nWe were able to successfully derive and validate a record linkage algorithm from a single EMS ePCR provider to our hospital EMR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":236137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

目的将紧急医疗服务(EMS)的电子患者护理报告(epcr)与急诊科(ED)的记录联系起来,可以为临床医生提供可以改变管理的重要信息。它还可以为研究和质量改进创建丰富的数据库。不幸的是,以前在ePCR和ED记录连接方面的尝试取得了有限的成功。在这项研究中,我们使用监督机器学习来推导和验证EMS epcr和ED记录之间的自动记录链接算法。材料与方法纳入2013年6月至2015年6月来自单一EMS供应商的所有连续epcr。主要审稿人将ePCRs与ED患者列表进行匹配,以创建黄金标准。提取了年龄、性别、姓、名、社会保险号和出生日期。数据随机分为80%的训练数据集和20%的测试数据集。我们推导了缺失指标、相同指标、编辑距离和百分比差异。使用5倍交叉验证训练多元逻辑回归模型,使用标签k-fold、L2正则化和类别重加权。结果共纳入14 032个ePCRs。第一审稿人和第二审稿人之间的信度kappa为0.9。该算法在训练集和测试集上的灵敏度为99.4%,阳性预测值为99.9%,接受者-工作特征曲线下面积为0.99。出生日期匹配的优势比最高,为16.9,其次是姓氏匹配(10.6)。社会安全号码匹配的比值比为3.8。结论:我们能够成功地推导并验证从单一EMS ePCR提供商到我们医院EMR的记录链接算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Derivation and validation of a machine learning record linkage algorithm between emergency medical services and the emergency department
OBJECTIVE Linking emergency medical services (EMS) electronic patient care reports (ePCRs) to emergency department (ED) records can provide clinicians access to vital information that can alter management. It can also create rich databases for research and quality improvement. Unfortunately, previous attempts at ePCR and ED record linkage have had limited success. In this study, we use supervised machine learning to derive and validate an automated record linkage algorithm between EMS ePCRs and ED records. MATERIALS AND METHODS All consecutive ePCRs from a single EMS provider between June 2013 and June 2015 were included. A primary reviewer matched ePCRs to a list of ED patients to create a gold standard. Age, gender, last name, first name, social security number, and date of birth were extracted. Data were randomly split into 80% training and 20% test datasets. We derived missing indicators, identical indicators, edit distances, and percent differences. A multivariate logistic regression model was trained using 5-fold cross-validation, using label k-fold, L2 regularization, and class reweighting. RESULTS A total of 14 032 ePCRs were included in the study. Interrater reliability between the primary and secondary reviewer had a kappa of 0.9. The algorithm had a sensitivity of 99.4%, a positive predictive value of 99.9%, and an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.99 in both the training and test datasets. Date-of-birth match had the highest odds ratio of 16.9, followed by last name match (10.6). Social security number match had an odds ratio of 3.8. CONCLUSIONS We were able to successfully derive and validate a record linkage algorithm from a single EMS ePCR provider to our hospital EMR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信