{"title":"杰文欠凯恩斯的债:一个未被注意的评论","authors":"T. Boylan, T. Foley","doi":"10.1017/S1042771600003902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his note we wish to draw attention to a curious ommission in the correspondence between J.E. Cairnes and W.S. Jevons during the course of 1863 relating to a majoi review by Cairnes of Jevons's pamphlet on the gold question. The fact that such a correspondence occurred is itself of some interest considering Cairnes's accepted position within the conventional interpretation of economic thought as representing the last ol the classical economists. This historical location of Cairnes would presumably undei normal circumstances have placed him in a position of potential intellectual conflicl with Jevons, who was, of course, the pivotal figure of the so-called \"marginalist revolution\" in England. Even apart from this, Jevons's well documented hostility to the intellectual influence of John Stuart Mill would arguably have been an additional source of opposition to Cairnes, given the latter's close personal friendship and more particularly his intellectual adherence to many of Mill's doctrines. Notwithstanding these potential sources of conflict between the two men, Jevons had, in fact, a very high regard for Cairnes's contributions to political economy. This is clearly evident from the correspondence between the two men, which was originally brought to light by R.D. Collinson Black.","PeriodicalId":123974,"journal":{"name":"History of Economics Society Bulletin","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jevon's Debt to Cairnes: An Unnoticed Review\",\"authors\":\"T. Boylan, T. Foley\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1042771600003902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In his note we wish to draw attention to a curious ommission in the correspondence between J.E. Cairnes and W.S. Jevons during the course of 1863 relating to a majoi review by Cairnes of Jevons's pamphlet on the gold question. The fact that such a correspondence occurred is itself of some interest considering Cairnes's accepted position within the conventional interpretation of economic thought as representing the last ol the classical economists. This historical location of Cairnes would presumably undei normal circumstances have placed him in a position of potential intellectual conflicl with Jevons, who was, of course, the pivotal figure of the so-called \\\"marginalist revolution\\\" in England. Even apart from this, Jevons's well documented hostility to the intellectual influence of John Stuart Mill would arguably have been an additional source of opposition to Cairnes, given the latter's close personal friendship and more particularly his intellectual adherence to many of Mill's doctrines. Notwithstanding these potential sources of conflict between the two men, Jevons had, in fact, a very high regard for Cairnes's contributions to political economy. This is clearly evident from the correspondence between the two men, which was originally brought to light by R.D. Collinson Black.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Economics Society Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Economics Society Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1042771600003902\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economics Society Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1042771600003902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
在他的笔记中,我们希望提请注意一个奇怪的委托,在J.E.凯恩斯和W.S.杰文斯在1863年期间的通信中,关于凯恩斯对杰文斯关于黄金问题的小册子的主要评论。考虑到凯恩斯在经济思想的传统解释中作为古典经济学家最后一代的代表所接受的地位,这种通信发生的事实本身就令人感兴趣。凯恩斯所处的历史位置在正常情况下可能会使他与杰文斯发生潜在的思想冲突,杰文斯是英国所谓“边际主义革命”的关键人物。除此之外,杰文斯对约翰·斯图亚特·密尔(John Stuart Mill)思想影响的敌意,也可能是反对凯恩斯的另一个原因,因为后者与他有着亲密的私人友谊,尤其是他在思想上对密尔许多学说的坚持。尽管两人之间存在这些潜在的冲突,但事实上,杰文斯对凯恩斯在政治经济学方面的贡献非常重视。从两人之间的通信中可以清楚地看出这一点,这些通信最初是由R.D.科林森·布莱克(R.D. Collinson Black)揭露的。
In his note we wish to draw attention to a curious ommission in the correspondence between J.E. Cairnes and W.S. Jevons during the course of 1863 relating to a majoi review by Cairnes of Jevons's pamphlet on the gold question. The fact that such a correspondence occurred is itself of some interest considering Cairnes's accepted position within the conventional interpretation of economic thought as representing the last ol the classical economists. This historical location of Cairnes would presumably undei normal circumstances have placed him in a position of potential intellectual conflicl with Jevons, who was, of course, the pivotal figure of the so-called "marginalist revolution" in England. Even apart from this, Jevons's well documented hostility to the intellectual influence of John Stuart Mill would arguably have been an additional source of opposition to Cairnes, given the latter's close personal friendship and more particularly his intellectual adherence to many of Mill's doctrines. Notwithstanding these potential sources of conflict between the two men, Jevons had, in fact, a very high regard for Cairnes's contributions to political economy. This is clearly evident from the correspondence between the two men, which was originally brought to light by R.D. Collinson Black.