{"title":"管柱滑脱系统数值分析评价管柱破碎问题","authors":"Shailesh Mirasdar, K. Deshpande, Federico Amezaga","doi":"10.2118/195323-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As the technology of offshore drilling improves, the industry seeks oil in deeper waters, inhospitable environments, and challenging climatic conditions. The new harsher drilling conditions warrant modifications to existing downhole tools and development of new technology using numerical simulations. The landing-string slip system (LSS) is a tubular-holding tool in which slips act as a spider to grip landing strings or drill pipe during makeup or breakout of drill strings. This paper presents a detailed numerical methodology to evaluate the safe pull-load rating for pipe held in the LSS. The method uses advanced computational techniques and applies ASME section VIII Division 2, Part 5 design criteria to corroborate numerical findings.\n First, laboratory tests were conducted on pipes with varying sizes to estimate the pipe load-carrying capacity without causing operational failure. Strain gauge measurements were taken at regular intervals during the laboratory tests. A detailed finite element analysis (FEA) using an explicit solver was conducted to computationally simulate the LSS operating mechanism. In particular, non-linear FEA was conducted on the 45° pipe section to simulate slip indentations followed by axial loading of the pipe. The maximum axial load applied on the pipe after slip indentation corresponds to 100% yielding load. ASME Section VIII Division 2, Part 5 design criteria involving ratcheting analyses was applied towards numerical studies at a 100% yield loading condition.\n Extensive FEA studies were conducted to check the validity of the numerical results with laboratory testing and then to understand the LSS capabilities for field-based loading scenarios. FEA studies predicted stresses within 10% of the values obtained through laboratory measurements. Simultaneously, FEA plastic strain patterns revealed that the spread of plastic strains is highly localized to the penetrated surfaces of the pipe and is also generally absent through the thickness for load capacity up to 100% of the pipe yield strength. Based on ASME section VIII Division 2, Part 5, a ratcheting analysis was conducted that involved loading and unloading cycles on the pipe to monitor the plastic strain propagation. The ratcheting analysis determined that for a 90% yield load, the LSS safely held pipe for operational purposes.\n The ratcheting evaluation was not possible using laboratory tests because of the cost and time required for a cyclic loading test. This paper introduces ASME section VIII Division 2, Part 5 design criteria to develop confidence in numerical results and justify the LSS design.","PeriodicalId":425264,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, April 24, 2019","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Landing String Slip System Numerical Analysis to Evaluate Pipe Crushing Problems\",\"authors\":\"Shailesh Mirasdar, K. Deshpande, Federico Amezaga\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/195323-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n As the technology of offshore drilling improves, the industry seeks oil in deeper waters, inhospitable environments, and challenging climatic conditions. The new harsher drilling conditions warrant modifications to existing downhole tools and development of new technology using numerical simulations. The landing-string slip system (LSS) is a tubular-holding tool in which slips act as a spider to grip landing strings or drill pipe during makeup or breakout of drill strings. This paper presents a detailed numerical methodology to evaluate the safe pull-load rating for pipe held in the LSS. The method uses advanced computational techniques and applies ASME section VIII Division 2, Part 5 design criteria to corroborate numerical findings.\\n First, laboratory tests were conducted on pipes with varying sizes to estimate the pipe load-carrying capacity without causing operational failure. Strain gauge measurements were taken at regular intervals during the laboratory tests. A detailed finite element analysis (FEA) using an explicit solver was conducted to computationally simulate the LSS operating mechanism. In particular, non-linear FEA was conducted on the 45° pipe section to simulate slip indentations followed by axial loading of the pipe. The maximum axial load applied on the pipe after slip indentation corresponds to 100% yielding load. ASME Section VIII Division 2, Part 5 design criteria involving ratcheting analyses was applied towards numerical studies at a 100% yield loading condition.\\n Extensive FEA studies were conducted to check the validity of the numerical results with laboratory testing and then to understand the LSS capabilities for field-based loading scenarios. FEA studies predicted stresses within 10% of the values obtained through laboratory measurements. Simultaneously, FEA plastic strain patterns revealed that the spread of plastic strains is highly localized to the penetrated surfaces of the pipe and is also generally absent through the thickness for load capacity up to 100% of the pipe yield strength. Based on ASME section VIII Division 2, Part 5, a ratcheting analysis was conducted that involved loading and unloading cycles on the pipe to monitor the plastic strain propagation. The ratcheting analysis determined that for a 90% yield load, the LSS safely held pipe for operational purposes.\\n The ratcheting evaluation was not possible using laboratory tests because of the cost and time required for a cyclic loading test. This paper introduces ASME section VIII Division 2, Part 5 design criteria to develop confidence in numerical results and justify the LSS design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":425264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Wed, April 24, 2019\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Wed, April 24, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/195323-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, April 24, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195323-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
随着海上钻井技术的进步,油气行业开始在更深的水域、恶劣的环境和恶劣的气候条件下寻找石油。新的苛刻的钻井条件要求对现有的井下工具进行改进,并利用数值模拟开发新技术。下入管柱卡瓦系统(LSS)是一种夹住管柱的工具,在上入或下入钻柱时,卡瓦可以像蜘蛛一样夹住下入管柱或钻杆。本文提出了一种详细的数值方法来评估LSS中持管的安全拉载荷额定值。该方法采用先进的计算技术,并应用ASME第VIII节第2部分第5部分设计标准来证实数值结果。首先,对不同尺寸的管道进行了实验室测试,以估计管道的承载能力,而不会造成操作故障。在实验室测试期间,每隔一段时间就进行应变计测量。采用显式求解器对LSS的工作机理进行了详细的有限元分析。特别对管道45°截面进行了非线性有限元分析,模拟了管道轴向加载后的滑移压痕。滑移压痕后施加在管道上的最大轴向载荷对应于100%屈服载荷。ASME Section VIII Division 2, Part 5设计标准涉及棘轮分析,应用于100%屈服载荷条件下的数值研究。进行了广泛的有限元分析研究,以通过实验室测试检查数值结果的有效性,然后了解LSS在现场加载场景下的能力。有限元分析研究预测应力在实验室测量值的10%以内。同时,有限元塑性应变分析表明,塑性应变的传播高度局限于管道的穿透表面,并且在管道屈服强度达到100%的承载能力厚度范围内,塑性应变的传播通常不存在。根据美国机械工程师协会(ASME)第VIII章第2部分第5部分,对管道进行了棘轮分析,包括加载和卸载循环,以监测塑性应变的传播。棘轮分析确定,在90%屈服载荷的情况下,LSS可以安全地固定管柱。由于循环加载测试所需的成本和时间,无法使用实验室测试进行棘轮评估。本文介绍了美国机械工程师协会(ASME)第VIII节第2部分第5部分的设计准则,以建立对数值结果的信心并证明LSS设计的合理性。
Landing String Slip System Numerical Analysis to Evaluate Pipe Crushing Problems
As the technology of offshore drilling improves, the industry seeks oil in deeper waters, inhospitable environments, and challenging climatic conditions. The new harsher drilling conditions warrant modifications to existing downhole tools and development of new technology using numerical simulations. The landing-string slip system (LSS) is a tubular-holding tool in which slips act as a spider to grip landing strings or drill pipe during makeup or breakout of drill strings. This paper presents a detailed numerical methodology to evaluate the safe pull-load rating for pipe held in the LSS. The method uses advanced computational techniques and applies ASME section VIII Division 2, Part 5 design criteria to corroborate numerical findings.
First, laboratory tests were conducted on pipes with varying sizes to estimate the pipe load-carrying capacity without causing operational failure. Strain gauge measurements were taken at regular intervals during the laboratory tests. A detailed finite element analysis (FEA) using an explicit solver was conducted to computationally simulate the LSS operating mechanism. In particular, non-linear FEA was conducted on the 45° pipe section to simulate slip indentations followed by axial loading of the pipe. The maximum axial load applied on the pipe after slip indentation corresponds to 100% yielding load. ASME Section VIII Division 2, Part 5 design criteria involving ratcheting analyses was applied towards numerical studies at a 100% yield loading condition.
Extensive FEA studies were conducted to check the validity of the numerical results with laboratory testing and then to understand the LSS capabilities for field-based loading scenarios. FEA studies predicted stresses within 10% of the values obtained through laboratory measurements. Simultaneously, FEA plastic strain patterns revealed that the spread of plastic strains is highly localized to the penetrated surfaces of the pipe and is also generally absent through the thickness for load capacity up to 100% of the pipe yield strength. Based on ASME section VIII Division 2, Part 5, a ratcheting analysis was conducted that involved loading and unloading cycles on the pipe to monitor the plastic strain propagation. The ratcheting analysis determined that for a 90% yield load, the LSS safely held pipe for operational purposes.
The ratcheting evaluation was not possible using laboratory tests because of the cost and time required for a cyclic loading test. This paper introduces ASME section VIII Division 2, Part 5 design criteria to develop confidence in numerical results and justify the LSS design.