原理及背景

C. Redinger, S. Levine
{"title":"原理及背景","authors":"C. Redinger, S. Levine","doi":"10.3320/978-0-932627-92-6.FM2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale and background As Senior lecturers we have been involved in teaching students studying for the Diploma/Degree in Professional Studies in Nursing and Social Work. The three-year programme is designed and delivered as a partnership between the School of Nursing at Manchester University and the School of Community, Health Sciences and Social Work at Salford University. The programme aims to professionally prepare workers going into the field of learning disabilities. One of the key aspects of the programmes is to consider how people with learning disabilities have been oppressed by society and to consider ways of working which may help redress this experience. Although empowerment is a contested concept (Means and Smith 1993) some of the existing literature on this topic presents empowerment as a key to redressing oppressions (Ward and Mullender 1991). However, empowerment tends to be presented as a vague concept with no practical models offered to help students learn how to 'do it'. It is suggested that the term empowerment has become a buzz word in recent years (Adams 1990), indicating that there is much rhetoric but little action. Other methods suggested to redress oppression are working in partnership (Rose and Jones 1994: Dalrymple & Burke 1995) and the development of advocacy skills (Walmsley & Downer 1997). The Literature tends to focus on empowerment, partnership, and advocacy as separate entitities rather than, as we believe, activities which not only bear some relationship to each other but are inextricably linked. There appeared to us to be a deficiency in the current literature and our response was to 'fill the gap'. We have been working for some time, on developing this teaching resource which is intended to help students to consider how empowerment, partnership and advocacy are integral processes. The teaching resource takes the form of a flow chart and is referred to as the 'Etcheton' model (see attached). The model illustrates various stages to show how powerless or powerful a person with learning disabilities might be and how the actions of others working in a partnership with them might be helping or hindering the process. The model makes a practical contribution to the students' learning by offering a visual resource which enables them to apply theory to practice and relates directly to the requirements of the programmes validating bodies e.g. The General Social Care Council and the Nursing and Midwifery Council. We have a background in social work …","PeriodicalId":132045,"journal":{"name":"The Economic Costs of the Israeli Occupation for the Palestinian People: Cumulative Fiscal Costs","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rationale and background\",\"authors\":\"C. Redinger, S. Levine\",\"doi\":\"10.3320/978-0-932627-92-6.FM2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rationale and background As Senior lecturers we have been involved in teaching students studying for the Diploma/Degree in Professional Studies in Nursing and Social Work. The three-year programme is designed and delivered as a partnership between the School of Nursing at Manchester University and the School of Community, Health Sciences and Social Work at Salford University. The programme aims to professionally prepare workers going into the field of learning disabilities. One of the key aspects of the programmes is to consider how people with learning disabilities have been oppressed by society and to consider ways of working which may help redress this experience. Although empowerment is a contested concept (Means and Smith 1993) some of the existing literature on this topic presents empowerment as a key to redressing oppressions (Ward and Mullender 1991). However, empowerment tends to be presented as a vague concept with no practical models offered to help students learn how to 'do it'. It is suggested that the term empowerment has become a buzz word in recent years (Adams 1990), indicating that there is much rhetoric but little action. Other methods suggested to redress oppression are working in partnership (Rose and Jones 1994: Dalrymple & Burke 1995) and the development of advocacy skills (Walmsley & Downer 1997). The Literature tends to focus on empowerment, partnership, and advocacy as separate entitities rather than, as we believe, activities which not only bear some relationship to each other but are inextricably linked. There appeared to us to be a deficiency in the current literature and our response was to 'fill the gap'. We have been working for some time, on developing this teaching resource which is intended to help students to consider how empowerment, partnership and advocacy are integral processes. The teaching resource takes the form of a flow chart and is referred to as the 'Etcheton' model (see attached). The model illustrates various stages to show how powerless or powerful a person with learning disabilities might be and how the actions of others working in a partnership with them might be helping or hindering the process. The model makes a practical contribution to the students' learning by offering a visual resource which enables them to apply theory to practice and relates directly to the requirements of the programmes validating bodies e.g. The General Social Care Council and the Nursing and Midwifery Council. We have a background in social work …\",\"PeriodicalId\":132045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Economic Costs of the Israeli Occupation for the Palestinian People: Cumulative Fiscal Costs\",\"volume\":\"146 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Economic Costs of the Israeli Occupation for the Palestinian People: Cumulative Fiscal Costs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3320/978-0-932627-92-6.FM2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Economic Costs of the Israeli Occupation for the Palestinian People: Cumulative Fiscal Costs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3320/978-0-932627-92-6.FM2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

基本原理和背景作为高级讲师,我们一直在教授学习护理和社会工作专业文凭/学位的学生。这个为期三年的课程是曼彻斯特大学护理学院和索尔福德大学社区、健康科学和社会工作学院合作设计和提供的。该方案旨在为进入学习障碍领域的工作人员提供专业准备。这些方案的一个关键方面是考虑有学习障碍的人如何受到社会的压迫,并考虑可能有助于纠正这种经历的工作方式。尽管赋权是一个有争议的概念(Means and Smith 1993),但关于这一主题的一些现有文献将赋权作为解决压迫的关键(Ward and Mullender 1991)。然而,授权往往是一个模糊的概念,没有提供实用的模型来帮助学生学习如何“做”。有人认为,近年来,“赋权”一词已经成为一个流行词(Adams 1990),这表明有很多修辞,但很少行动。纠正压迫的其他方法包括合作(Rose and Jones 1994; Dalrymple & Burke 1995)和倡导技能的发展(Walmsley & Downer 1997)。文献倾向于把赋权、伙伴关系和倡导作为独立的实体,而不是像我们认为的那样,不仅彼此有某种关系,而且不可分割地联系在一起的活动。在我们看来,目前的文献中似乎有不足之处,我们的反应是“填补空白”。我们已经努力了一段时间,开发这个教学资源,旨在帮助学生考虑如何授权,伙伴关系和倡导是一个完整的过程。该教学资源采用流程图的形式,称为“Etcheton”模型(见附件)。该模型说明了不同的阶段,以显示有学习障碍的人可能是多么无能为力或强大,以及与他们合作的其他人的行为如何帮助或阻碍这一过程。该模型为学生的学习做出了实际贡献,提供了一种视觉资源,使他们能够将理论应用于实践,并直接与课程验证机构(如一般社会护理委员会和护理和助产委员会)的要求有关。我们有社会工作的背景……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rationale and background
Rationale and background As Senior lecturers we have been involved in teaching students studying for the Diploma/Degree in Professional Studies in Nursing and Social Work. The three-year programme is designed and delivered as a partnership between the School of Nursing at Manchester University and the School of Community, Health Sciences and Social Work at Salford University. The programme aims to professionally prepare workers going into the field of learning disabilities. One of the key aspects of the programmes is to consider how people with learning disabilities have been oppressed by society and to consider ways of working which may help redress this experience. Although empowerment is a contested concept (Means and Smith 1993) some of the existing literature on this topic presents empowerment as a key to redressing oppressions (Ward and Mullender 1991). However, empowerment tends to be presented as a vague concept with no practical models offered to help students learn how to 'do it'. It is suggested that the term empowerment has become a buzz word in recent years (Adams 1990), indicating that there is much rhetoric but little action. Other methods suggested to redress oppression are working in partnership (Rose and Jones 1994: Dalrymple & Burke 1995) and the development of advocacy skills (Walmsley & Downer 1997). The Literature tends to focus on empowerment, partnership, and advocacy as separate entitities rather than, as we believe, activities which not only bear some relationship to each other but are inextricably linked. There appeared to us to be a deficiency in the current literature and our response was to 'fill the gap'. We have been working for some time, on developing this teaching resource which is intended to help students to consider how empowerment, partnership and advocacy are integral processes. The teaching resource takes the form of a flow chart and is referred to as the 'Etcheton' model (see attached). The model illustrates various stages to show how powerless or powerful a person with learning disabilities might be and how the actions of others working in a partnership with them might be helping or hindering the process. The model makes a practical contribution to the students' learning by offering a visual resource which enables them to apply theory to practice and relates directly to the requirements of the programmes validating bodies e.g. The General Social Care Council and the Nursing and Midwifery Council. We have a background in social work …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信