两种产品供应链动态下生产控制策略的比较

R. Corsini, Antonio Costa, S. Fichera
{"title":"两种产品供应链动态下生产控制策略的比较","authors":"R. Corsini, Antonio Costa, S. Fichera","doi":"10.1109/CASE49439.2021.9551581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with a comparison of production control policies in a two-product two-echelon supply chain dynamic problem with production capacity constraint. The factory related echelon consists of an unreliable manufacturing system that cannot produce both types of products simultaneously. Therefore, changeover operations are required to switch from one type of product to another. The decision on the product changeover depends on the production control policy. This research compares the well-known Hedging Corridor Policy, which has been previously adopted by the literature in a supply chain with production capacity constraints, and the Improved Modified Hedging Corridor Policy, which has been proved to minimize the total cost incurred in manufacturing companies characterized by unreliable production systems with constant demand rate. For comparison purposes, an experimental campaign was conducted through an analytical model based on discrete-time difference equations to investigate the Fill Rate of the multi-product supply chain as response variable. A proper ANDVA analysis and a set of interval plots revealed that the Hedging Corridor Policy outperforms the Improved Modified Hedging Corridor Policy in improving the Fill Rate Indicator.","PeriodicalId":232083,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 17th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing production control policies in two-product supply chain dynamics\",\"authors\":\"R. Corsini, Antonio Costa, S. Fichera\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CASE49439.2021.9551581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper deals with a comparison of production control policies in a two-product two-echelon supply chain dynamic problem with production capacity constraint. The factory related echelon consists of an unreliable manufacturing system that cannot produce both types of products simultaneously. Therefore, changeover operations are required to switch from one type of product to another. The decision on the product changeover depends on the production control policy. This research compares the well-known Hedging Corridor Policy, which has been previously adopted by the literature in a supply chain with production capacity constraints, and the Improved Modified Hedging Corridor Policy, which has been proved to minimize the total cost incurred in manufacturing companies characterized by unreliable production systems with constant demand rate. For comparison purposes, an experimental campaign was conducted through an analytical model based on discrete-time difference equations to investigate the Fill Rate of the multi-product supply chain as response variable. A proper ANDVA analysis and a set of interval plots revealed that the Hedging Corridor Policy outperforms the Improved Modified Hedging Corridor Policy in improving the Fill Rate Indicator.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE 17th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE)\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE 17th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CASE49439.2021.9551581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 17th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CASE49439.2021.9551581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

研究了具有生产能力约束的两产品两梯次供应链动态问题的生产控制策略比较。工厂相关梯队由一个不可靠的制造系统组成,该系统不能同时生产这两种产品。因此,从一种类型的产品切换到另一种类型的产品需要转换操作。产品转换的决定取决于生产控制政策。本研究比较了著名的套期保值走廊政策和改进的修正套期保值走廊政策,前者在产能受限的供应链中已被文献采用,后者已被证明可以最小化需求率恒定的不可靠生产系统的制造企业所产生的总成本。为了进行比较,通过基于离散时差方程的分析模型进行了实验活动,以研究多产品供应链的填充率作为响应变量。适当的ANDVA分析和一组区间图显示,对冲走廊政策在提高填充率指标方面优于改进的修正对冲走廊政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing production control policies in two-product supply chain dynamics
This paper deals with a comparison of production control policies in a two-product two-echelon supply chain dynamic problem with production capacity constraint. The factory related echelon consists of an unreliable manufacturing system that cannot produce both types of products simultaneously. Therefore, changeover operations are required to switch from one type of product to another. The decision on the product changeover depends on the production control policy. This research compares the well-known Hedging Corridor Policy, which has been previously adopted by the literature in a supply chain with production capacity constraints, and the Improved Modified Hedging Corridor Policy, which has been proved to minimize the total cost incurred in manufacturing companies characterized by unreliable production systems with constant demand rate. For comparison purposes, an experimental campaign was conducted through an analytical model based on discrete-time difference equations to investigate the Fill Rate of the multi-product supply chain as response variable. A proper ANDVA analysis and a set of interval plots revealed that the Hedging Corridor Policy outperforms the Improved Modified Hedging Corridor Policy in improving the Fill Rate Indicator.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信