非现场施工技能的演变:一个澳大利亚的案例研究

B. Ginigaddara, S. Perera, Yingbin Feng, P. Rahnamayiezekavat
{"title":"非现场施工技能的演变:一个澳大利亚的案例研究","authors":"B. Ginigaddara, S. Perera, Yingbin Feng, P. Rahnamayiezekavat","doi":"10.1108/CI-10-2019-0109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe construction industry is currently responding to pressures of industrialisation happening across all sectors. Consequently, offsite construction (OSC) has become a vehicle to achieve industrialisation. This requires changes in traditional construction processes resulting in possible changes in construction skill requirements. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to identify and review prevailing OSC practices and skills in the Australian construction industry. This study aims to critically analyse the existing skill profile classifications through a single case study and identify the need for an OSC specific skill classification.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study follows a case study design, with an in-depth analysis of a single construction project. Only one case study was studied because scientifically, one example was enough to prove that the prevailing skill classifications do not represent OSC skills in a modern context. Data was retrospectively collected through semi-structured interviews of project stakeholders representing design, manufacture and assembly. Content analysis was conducted to analyse the collected data and produce findings.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study identifies the inadequacy of the existing classification system, unavailability and the need of OSC specific skill categorisation. It highlights new skills that enter OSC; building information modelling engineer, three-dimensional draftsperson, OSC project manager and project coordinator, which are not identified in the available Australian skill classifications. These, together with existing skills need to be carved in to create a new skill classification.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study is the first of its kind where a comprehensive OSC project is evaluated as a case study to determine OSC skill classification requirements in Australia.\n","PeriodicalId":221945,"journal":{"name":"Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Offsite construction skills evolution: an Australian case study\",\"authors\":\"B. Ginigaddara, S. Perera, Yingbin Feng, P. Rahnamayiezekavat\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/CI-10-2019-0109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe construction industry is currently responding to pressures of industrialisation happening across all sectors. Consequently, offsite construction (OSC) has become a vehicle to achieve industrialisation. This requires changes in traditional construction processes resulting in possible changes in construction skill requirements. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to identify and review prevailing OSC practices and skills in the Australian construction industry. This study aims to critically analyse the existing skill profile classifications through a single case study and identify the need for an OSC specific skill classification.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study follows a case study design, with an in-depth analysis of a single construction project. Only one case study was studied because scientifically, one example was enough to prove that the prevailing skill classifications do not represent OSC skills in a modern context. Data was retrospectively collected through semi-structured interviews of project stakeholders representing design, manufacture and assembly. Content analysis was conducted to analyse the collected data and produce findings.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThis study identifies the inadequacy of the existing classification system, unavailability and the need of OSC specific skill categorisation. It highlights new skills that enter OSC; building information modelling engineer, three-dimensional draftsperson, OSC project manager and project coordinator, which are not identified in the available Australian skill classifications. These, together with existing skills need to be carved in to create a new skill classification.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study is the first of its kind where a comprehensive OSC project is evaluated as a case study to determine OSC skill classification requirements in Australia.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":221945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-10-2019-0109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-10-2019-0109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

建筑行业目前正在应对所有部门发生的工业化压力。因此,非现场施工(OSC)已经成为实现工业化的一种手段。这就要求改变传统的施工工艺,从而可能改变对施工技能的要求。因此,本研究的目的是确定和审查澳大利亚建筑业中流行的OSC做法和技能。本研究旨在通过单个案例分析批判性地分析现有的技能概况分类,并确定OSC特定技能分类的必要性。设计/方法/方法本研究遵循案例研究设计,对单个建筑项目进行深入分析。只研究了一个案例研究,因为从科学的角度来看,一个例子足以证明,在现代背景下,流行的技能分类并不代表OSC技能。通过对代表设计、制造和组装的项目利益相关者的半结构化访谈,回顾性地收集数据。进行内容分析,分析收集到的数据并得出结论。本研究确定了现有分类系统的不足、不可获得性和OSC特定技能分类的必要性。它突出了进入OSC的新技能;建筑信息建模工程师、三维绘图员、OSC项目经理和项目协调员,这些都不在澳大利亚现有的技能分类中。这些,连同现有的技能,需要雕刻,以创建一个新的技能分类。原创性/价值本研究首次将综合OSC项目作为案例研究进行评估,以确定澳大利亚OSC技能分类要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Offsite construction skills evolution: an Australian case study
Purpose The construction industry is currently responding to pressures of industrialisation happening across all sectors. Consequently, offsite construction (OSC) has become a vehicle to achieve industrialisation. This requires changes in traditional construction processes resulting in possible changes in construction skill requirements. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to identify and review prevailing OSC practices and skills in the Australian construction industry. This study aims to critically analyse the existing skill profile classifications through a single case study and identify the need for an OSC specific skill classification. Design/methodology/approach This study follows a case study design, with an in-depth analysis of a single construction project. Only one case study was studied because scientifically, one example was enough to prove that the prevailing skill classifications do not represent OSC skills in a modern context. Data was retrospectively collected through semi-structured interviews of project stakeholders representing design, manufacture and assembly. Content analysis was conducted to analyse the collected data and produce findings. Findings This study identifies the inadequacy of the existing classification system, unavailability and the need of OSC specific skill categorisation. It highlights new skills that enter OSC; building information modelling engineer, three-dimensional draftsperson, OSC project manager and project coordinator, which are not identified in the available Australian skill classifications. These, together with existing skills need to be carved in to create a new skill classification. Originality/value This study is the first of its kind where a comprehensive OSC project is evaluated as a case study to determine OSC skill classification requirements in Australia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信